Craniofacial External Distraction Apparatus
US-2015238228-A1 · Aug 27, 2015 · US
US9856990B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9856990-B2 |
| Application number | US-201715672994-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 9, 2017 |
| Priority date | Dec 21, 2011 |
| Publication date | Jan 2, 2018 |
| Grant date | Jan 2, 2018 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A flow meter includes an image sensor, a coupler, a support member and one or more processors. The coupler is adapted to couple to a drip chamber. The support member is operatively coupled to the coupler. The image sensor has a field of view and is operatively coupled to the support member. The image sensor is positioned to view the drip chamber within the field of view. The processor receives data from the image sensor and is configured to: receive a first image from the image sensor, compare the first image to a second image, and generate a difference image based upon the comparison between the first and second images.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A flow meter, comprising: a coupler adapted to couple to a drip chamber; a support member operatively coupled to the coupler; a background pattern disposed behind the drip chamber; an image sensor having a field of view and operatively coupled to the support member, wherein the image sensor is positioned to view the drip chamber within the field of view; and at least one processor in communication with the image sensor to receive data from the image sensor, wherein the at least one processor is configured to: receive a first image from the image sensor, compare the first image to a second image, and generate a difference image based upon the comparison between the first and second images. 2. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to estimate a parameter of liquid using the difference image. 3. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine an existence of a free flow condition using the difference image. 4. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a drop size using the difference image. 5. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a drop growth rate using the difference image. 6. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to identifying an optical distortion of an area behind a free flow condition within the drip chamber using the difference image. 7. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to estimate an optical distortion by using the difference image. 8. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the second image is a background image. 9. The flow meter according to claim 8 , wherein the background image is a dynamic background image. 10. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the second image is a previously captured image. 11. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to estimate an optical distortion by using the difference image, wherein the difference image is an absolute difference between the first image and the second image. 12. The flow meter according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to estimate the optical distortion by determining a squared absolute difference between the first image to the second image. 13. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: subtract the first image from the second image to thereby generate the difference image, and convert each pixel of the difference image to a true value if an absolute value of a respective pixel is greater than a predetermined threshold or to a false value if the absolute value of the respective pixel is less than the predetermined threshold. 14. The flow meter according to claim 13 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: sum each row of the converted difference image to generate a plurality of summation values, wherein each summation value of the plurality of summation values corresponds to a respective row of the converted difference image, and examine the plurality of summation values. 15. The flow meter according to claim 14 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine if a free flow condition exists within the drip chamber when examining the plurality of summation values. 16. The flow meter according to claim 15 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine that the free flow condition exists when the plurality of summation values includes a plurality of contiguous summation values above another predetermined threshold. 17. The flow meter according to claim 14 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a drop has been formed when the at least one processor examines the plurality of summation values. 18. The flow meter according to claim 17 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine if the plurality of summation values includes a plurality of contiguous summation values within a predetermined range greater than a minimum value and less than a maximum value to thereby determine if the drop has been formed within the drip chamber. 19. The flow meter according to claim 14 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to smooth the plurality of summation values. 20. The flow meter according to claim 19 , wherein the at least one processor smoothes the plurality of summation values is in accordance with at least one of a spline function, a cubic spline function, a B-spline function, a Bezier spline function, a polynomial interpolation, a moving average, a data smoothing function, and a cubic-spline-type function. 21. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to convert each pixel of the difference image to a squared value of each pixel. 22. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to create a first thresholded image using the first image. 23. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a set of pixels within a first thresholded image connected to a predetermined set of pixels within the first thresholded image. 24. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to filter all remaining pixels of a first thresholded image that are not within a set of pixels, the filter operates on a pixel-by-pixel basis within a time domain to generate a first filtered image. 25. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to remove pixels determined to not be part of a drop from a first thresholded image using a first filtered image to generate a generated second image. 26. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a second set of pixels within a generated second image connected to a predetermined set of pixels within the generated second image to generate a third image, the third image identifies the second set of pixels within the generated second image. 27. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to determine a first length of a drop by counting a number of rows containing pixels corresponding to a second set of pixels within a third image, the first length corresponding to a first estimated drop size. 28. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to update a generated second image using the first image. 29. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to create a second thresholded image by comparing the first image with the second image. 30. The flow meter according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is further configured to sum rows of a second thresholded image to create a plurality of row sums, each row sum corresponds to a row of the second thresholded image. 31. The flow meter according
Analysis of motion (motion estimation for coding, decoding, compressing or decompressing digital video signals H04N19/43, H04N19/51) · CPC title
Drip chambers (A61M5/162, A61M5/1689, A61M5/40 take precedence) · CPC title
Proximity, similarity or dissimilarity measures · CPC title
Organisation of the matching processes, e.g. simultaneous or sequential comparisons of image or video features; Coarse-fine approaches, e.g. multi-scale approaches; using context analysis; Selection of dictionaries · CPC title
Matching criteria, e.g. proximity measures · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.