Using radar derived location data in a gps landing system
US-2017297737-A1 · Oct 19, 2017 · US
US9836064B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9836064-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615059173-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 2, 2016 |
| Priority date | Mar 2, 2016 |
| Publication date | Dec 5, 2017 |
| Grant date | Dec 5, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for controlling an aircraft includes storing data aboard the aircraft. The data include the relative positions of radar targets disposed within a region adjacent to the runway. The region is scanned with a radar aboard the aircraft to obtain data corresponding to the relative positions of radar reflections from the region, including reflections from the radar targets. The data corresponding to the radar targets is distinguished from the data corresponding to the radar reflections from the region using correlation techniques. The position and attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway is then assessed using the stored data and the data corresponding to the radar targets. The position and attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway is also evaluated using an independent navigation system. The difference between the assessed position and attitude and the evaluated position and attitude is then used to control the aircraft.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for controlling an aircraft, the method comprising: accessing data aboard the aircraft, the data including: respective positions, relative to each other and to a runway, of a plurality of radar targets disposed within a region adjacent to the runway; and a desired attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway; scanning the region with a radar disposed aboard the aircraft to obtain radar data corresponding to respective positions, relative to each other and to the aircraft, of a plurality of radar reflections from the region, including reflections from the radar targets; distinguishing the radar data corresponding to the radar targets from the radar data corresponding to the radar reflections; assessing a position and an attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway using the data and the radar data corresponding to the radar targets; evaluating the position and the attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway using a navigation system that is independent of the radar; computing a difference between the assessed position and the evaluated position; and computing a difference between the assessed attitude and the evaluated attitude. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the radar comprises a weather radar. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the radar targets comprises a dihedral or a trihedral radar reflector. 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the distinguishing comprises correlating the respective positions of the radar targets relative to each other, as obtained by the radar, with the respective positions of the radar targets relative to each other, as stored aboard the aircraft. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling the aircraft in accordance with at least one of the position difference and the attitude difference. 6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the controlling comprises: adjusting a rectilinear movement of a center of gravity (CG) of the aircraft; and adjusting an angular movement of the aircraft about each of a pitch axis, a yaw axis and a roll axis of the aircraft. 7. The method of claim 5 , wherein the controlling is effected by an autopilot disposed aboard the aircraft. 8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising: displaying at least one of the assessed position and attitude and/or the evaluated position and attitude on a display disposed aboard the aircraft; and effecting the controlling manually using the display. 9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the accessing further comprises: surveying the radar targets and the runway to obtain the data; and storing the data in a database of the aircraft. 10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of: correcting the assessed position as a function of the position difference; and/or correcting the assessed attitude as a function of the attitude difference. 11. A system for controlling an aircraft, the system comprising: a database disposed aboard the aircraft and storing data corresponding to: respective positions, relative to each other and to a runway, of a plurality of radar targets disposed within a region adjacent to the runway; and a desired attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway; a radar disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to scan, detect and generate data corresponding to respective positions, relative to each other and to the aircraft, of a plurality of radar reflections from the region, including reflections from the radar targets; a correlator disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to distinguish the radar data corresponding to the radar targets from the radar data corresponding to the radar reflections; and a navigation system disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to: assess a position and an attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway using the stored data and the radar data corresponding to the radar targets; evaluate the position and the attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway independently of the radar and using at least one of a global positioning system (GPS), an inertial navigation system (INS), a distance measuring equipment (DME) system, a very high frequency omnidirectional radio range (VOR) system, and/or an instrument landing system (ILS); compute a difference between the assessed position and the evaluated position; compute a difference between the assessed attitude and the evaluated attitude; and control the aircraft in accordance with at least one of the position and attitude differences. 12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the correlator comprises: a computer; and an algorithm comprising a non-transitory machine-readable medium comprising a plurality of machine-readable instructions which, when executed by one or more processors of the computer, are configured to cause the computer to: correlate the respective positions of the radar targets relative to each other, as obtained by the radar, with the respective positions of the radar targets relative to each other, as stored aboard the aircraft; and distinguish the radar data corresponding to the radar targets from the radar data corresponding to the radar reflections. 13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the radar comprises a weather radar. 14. The system of claim 11 , further comprising an autopilot configured to control the aircraft in accordance with the difference. 15. The system of claim 11 , further comprising a display configured to generate and present to a pilot of the aircraft a visual presentation of at least one of: the assessed position of the aircraft; the evaluated position of the aircraft; the assessed attitude of the aircraft; the evaluated attitude of the aircraft; the position difference; and/or the attitude difference. 16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the display comprises a heads up display (HUD). 17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the navigation system comprises a plurality of identical or substantially similar navigation systems operating redundantly. 18. An apparatus for controlling an aircraft, the apparatus comprising: a radar disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to: scan a region surrounding a runway; and generate radar data corresponding to respective positions, relative to each other and the aircraft, of a plurality of radar reflections from the region, including reflections from radar targets; a correlator disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to: correlate the radar data with data located aboard the aircraft, the data comprising respective positions, relative to each other and the runway, of a plurality of radar targets disposed within the region relative to the runway, and a desired attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway; and distinguish the radar data corresponding to the radar targets from the radar data corresponding to the radar reflections; a navigation system disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to evaluate a position and an attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway independently of the radar; and a computer disposed aboard the aircraft and configured to: assess the position and the attitude of the aircraft relative to the runway using the radar data corresponding to the radar targets and the data located aboard the aircraft; and compute a difference between the assessed position and attitude of the aircraft and the evaluated position and attitude of the aircraft. 19. The apparatus of claim 18 , further comprising a controller configured to control movement of the aircraft at least in part as a function of the difference.
for landing purposes · CPC title
Combination of several spaced transponders or reflectors of known location for determining the position of a receiver (G01S13/874 takes precedence) · CPC title
Landing aids; Safety measures to prevent collision with earth's surface · CPC title
mounted on aircraft · CPC title
comprising plurality of mutually inclined plane surfaces, e.g. corner reflector {(H01Q15/16 takes precedence)} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.