Sensor based closed loop control of active aerodynamic elements
US-2017088194-A1 · Mar 30, 2017 · US
US9827957B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9827957-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615216230-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 21, 2016 |
| Priority date | Sep 25, 2015 |
| Publication date | Nov 28, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 28, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A vehicle employing an active aerodynamic control system is described. A method for controlling the active aerodynamic control system includes determining a target acceleration downforce associated with an acceleration request and vehicle speed, determining a target braking downforce associated with a braking request and vehicle speed, and determining a target cornering downforce associated with a cornering request and vehicle speed. A maximum downforce request and a second greatest downforce request of the target acceleration downforce, the target braking downforce, and the target cornering downforce are determined. A preferred front/rear distribution of downforce is determined based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request. The active aerodynamic control system is controlled based upon the preferred front/rear distribution of downforce and the maximum downforce request.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for controlling an active aerodynamic control system disposed on a vehicle, comprising: determining a target acceleration downforce associated with an acceleration request and a vehicle speed; determining a target braking downforce associated with a braking request and the vehicle speed; determining a target cornering downforce associated with a cornering request and the vehicle speed; determining a maximum downforce request based upon the target acceleration downforce, the target braking downforce, and the target cornering downforce; determining a second greatest downforce request based upon the target acceleration downforce, the target braking downforce, and the target cornering downforce; determining a preferred front/rear distribution of downforce based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request; and controlling the active aerodynamic control system based upon the preferred front/rear distribution of downforce and the maximum downforce request. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a target acceleration downforce associated with an acceleration request and a vehicle speed comprises determining a magnitude of downforce that maximizes vehicle acceleration when the vehicle is operating in a straight line. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the magnitude of downforce that maximizes vehicle acceleration when the vehicle is operating in a straight line comprises determining a magnitude of longitudinal wheel slip while transferring torque to the ground surface without generating an excessive drag force on the vehicle based upon an operator acceleration request, a present vehicle speed, a vehicle acceleration torque, and the vehicle speed in comparison with a wheel speed. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a target braking downforce associated with a braking request and the vehicle speed comprises determining a magnitude of downforce that maximizes vehicle braking when the vehicle is operating in a straight line and achieves an optimum magnitude of longitudinal wheel slip while transferring a torque to the ground surface. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the magnitude of downforce that maximizes vehicle braking when the vehicle is operating in a straight line and achieves an optimum magnitude of longitudinal wheel slip while transferring torque to the ground surface is based upon a magnitude of an operator requested braking torque and a present vehicle speed based upon a vehicle torque and a comparison of the vehicle speed and a wheel speed. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a target cornering downforce associated with a cornering request and the vehicle speed comprises determining a magnitude of downforce that minimizes lateral wheel slip and drag force on the vehicle when traversing a curve. 7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the magnitude of downforce that minimizes lateral wheel slip and drag force on the vehicle when traversing a curve is based upon a steering angle request, a present steering angle and vehicle speed, an operator-requested lateral acceleration rate, a comparison of the vehicle speed and the wheel speed, and the lateral wheel slip. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a preferred front/rear distribution of downforce based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request comprises determining a ratio of the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request. 9. The method of claim 8 , comprising applying a first percentage of the maximum downforce request to a front of the vehicle and applying a remaining percentage of the maximum downforce request to a rear of the vehicle. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining a preferred front/rear distribution of downforce based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request comprises interpolating between the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request, wherein the interpolation is dynamically weighted based on a downforce bias of the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request. 11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining a preferred left/right distribution of downforce based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request; and controlling the active aerodynamic control system based upon the preferred left/right distribution of the maximum downforce request and the maximum downforce request. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the active aerodynamic control system includes a moveable front spoiler assembly and a moveable rear spoiler assembly, and wherein controlling the active aerodynamic control system based upon the preferred front/rear distribution of downforce and the maximum downforce request comprises controlling positions of the moveable front spoiler assembly and the moveable rear spoiler assembly. 13. A motor vehicle, comprising: a plurality of road wheels; a drivetrain including a power plant mechanically coupled via a geartrain to one of the road wheels; an active aerodynamic control system including a controllable front spoiler assembly and a controllable rear spoiler assembly; a plurality of sensors for monitoring vehicle operation related to vehicle ride and handling; and an electronic controller in communication with the plurality of sensors and operatively connected to the active aerodynamic control system, the controller including an instruction set, the instruction set executable to: determine a target acceleration downforce associated with an acceleration request and a vehicle speed, determine a target braking downforce associated with a braking request and the vehicle speed, determine a target cornering downforce associated with a cornering request and the vehicle speed, determine a maximum downforce request based upon the target acceleration downforce, the target braking downforce, and the target cornering downforce, determine a second greatest downforce request based upon the target acceleration downforce, the target braking downforce, and the target cornering downforce, determine a preferred front/rear distribution of downforce based upon the maximum downforce request and the second greatest downforce request, and control the active aerodynamic control system based upon the preferred front/rear distribution of downforce and the maximum downforce request. 14. The motor vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of sensors for monitoring vehicle operation related to vehicle ride and handling comprises: a plurality of first sensors disposed to monitor rotating speeds of each of the road wheels; a second sensor disposed to detect a yaw moment of the vehicle; a third sensor disposed to monitor an angle of a steering wheel; and a fourth sensor disposed to monitor a velocity of ambient airflow relative to the vehicle. 15. The motor vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the instruction set executable to determine the target acceleration downforce associated with the acceleration request and the vehicle speed comprises an instruction set executable to determine a magnitude of downforce that maximizes a vehicle acceleration when the vehicle is operating in a straight line, wherein the magnitude of downforce that maximizes the vehicle acceleration when the vehicle is operating in a straight line is determined based upon a magnitude of longitudinal wheel slip while transferring torque to the ground surface and a drag force on the vehicle. 16. The motor vehicle of claim 13 , wherein the instruction set executable
Optimized components or subsystems, e.g. lighting, actively controlled glasses · CPC title
Microprocessor-based systems · CPC title
Proportioning of brake forces according to vehicle axle loads, e.g. front to rear of vehicle · CPC title
by increasing air resistance, e.g. flaps · CPC title
specially adapted for enhancing stability around the vehicles longitudinal axle, i.e. roll-over prevention (road vehicle drive control systems for roll-over prevention otherwise than by controlling a particular sub-unit B60W30/04) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.