Method and apparatus for multicast implementation in a network
US-2016380877-A1 · Dec 29, 2016 · US
US9826414B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9826414-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514982581-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Dec 29, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 12, 2015 |
| Publication date | Nov 21, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 21, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Systems and methods for designing cellular backhaul networks are disclosed. The system can include an Adaptive Graph Minimum Spanning Tree (AG-MST) algorithm to identify and connect stranded cellular sites at minimum cost. The system can compare pending bids for new connections such as, for example, new microwave or fiber optic links at stranded sites to provide new connectivity. The system can design a network that connects the maximum number of stranded sites at the minimum average cost per site.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. One or more non-transitory computer-readable media storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed on one or more processors, perform acts comprising: identifying stranded sites in a cellular communication system; creating a stranded site cluster comprising a mesh network graph between stranded sites and relay sites for a portion of a network; updating weights for each vertex and edge for which there is an associated bid cost; identifying a first potential starting point in the stranded site cluster; updating the stranded site cluster by removing connected stranded sites; identifying a first, minimum weight spanning tree solution for the first potential starting point; determining that each microwave link capacity in the first, minimum weight spanning tree solution is equal to, or larger than, an aggregated site capacity; and determining that an end-to-end backhaul availability is equal to or larger than a minimum backhaul availability threshold. 2. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , the acts further comprising: determining that the first solution represents a minimum average cost per stranded site. 3. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 2 , further comprising: identifying a second potential starting point in the stranded site cluster; updating the stranded site cluster by removing connected stranded sites; identifying a second, minimum weight spanning tree solution for the second potential starting point; determining that each microwave link capacity in the second, minimum weight spanning tree solution is equal to, or larger than, the aggregated site capacity; determining that the second solution represents the minimum average cost per stranded site; and discarding the first solution. 4. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , the acts further comprising: determining that the first solution cost is below a predetermined threshold cost. 5. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , wherein the associated bid cost comprises adding a fiber optic connection to the first potential starting point. 6. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , wherein the associated bid cost comprises adding a microwave link connection to the first potential starting point. 7. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , wherein the weights for each vertex and edge comprise at least one of bandwidth, cost, and availability. 8. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , wherein the mesh network graph between stranded sites and relay sites comprises a plurality of line-of-site (LoS), near-line-of-site (nLoS), and non-line-of-site (NLoS) point-to-point (P2P) connections. 9. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable media of claim 1 , wherein the mesh network graph between stranded sites and relay sites comprises at least one item of physical information for at least one of the stranded sites or at least one of the relay sites. 10. A method comprising: identifying stranded sites in a cellular communication system; creating a stranded site cluster comprising a mesh network graph between at least one stranded site and at least one relay site for a portion of a network; updating weights for each vertex and edge for which there is an associated bid cost; identifying one or more potential starting points in the stranded site cluster; updating the stranded site cluster by removing connected stranded sites; identifying a first, minimum weight spanning tree solution for each of the one or more potential starting points; determining that each microwave link capacity in the first, minimum weight spanning tree solution is equal to, or larger than, an aggregated site capacity; and determining that an end-to-end backhaul availability is equal to or larger than a minimum backhaul availability threshold. 11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising: determining a solution in the first subset that provides a minimum average cost per stranded site. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the associated bid cost comprises a contractor bid to add a fiber optic connection to at least one of the stranded sites. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the associated bid cost comprises a contractor bid to add a microwave connection to at least one of the stranded sites. 14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one relay site comprises a site with an existing microwave link. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one relay site comprises a site with an existing alternative access vendor (AAV) connection. 16. A backhaul optimization engine comprising: a processor; system memory; and an adaptive graph minimum spanning tree (AG-MST) algorithm to: identify stranded sites in a cellular communication system; create a stranded site cluster comprising a mesh network graph between at least one stranded site and at least one relay site for a portion of a network; update weights for each vertex and edge for which there is an associated bid cost; identify one or more potential starting points in the stranded site cluster; update the stranded site cluster by removing connected stranded sites; identify a first, minimum weight spanning tree solution for each of the one or more potential starting points; determine that each microwave link capacity in the first, minimum weight spanning tree solution is equal to, or larger than, an aggregated site capacity; and determine that an end-to-end backhaul availability is equal to or larger than a minimum backhaul availability threshold. 17. The backhaul optimization engine of claim 16 , wherein the AG-MST algorithm is further to: determine a solution that provides a minimum average cost per stranded site. 18. The backhaul optimization engine of claim 16 , wherein the associated bid cost comprises a contractor bid to add at least one of a fiber optic connection and a microwave link to at least one of the stranded sites.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.