Machine learned model for generating opinionated threat assessments of security vulnerabilities
US-2024411898-A1 · Dec 12, 2024 · US
US9824221B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9824221-B2 |
| Application number | US-201314081095-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 15, 2013 |
| Priority date | Feb 6, 2007 |
| Publication date | Nov 21, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 21, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A dynamic risk management system for operating systems that provides monitoring, detection, assessment, and follow-up action to reduce the risk whenever it rises. The system enables an operating system to protect itself automatically in dynamic environments. The risk management system monitors a diverse set of attributes of the system which determines the security state of the system and is indicative of the risk the system is under. Based on a specification of risk levels for the various attributes and for their combinations, the risk management system determines whether one or more actions are required to alleviate the overall risk to the system.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method performed on a computing device that includes a network access protection (“NAP”) agent, the method comprising: determining, by the computing device based on communication over a network between the NAP and a NAP server, whether a level of risk associated with the computing device crosses a threshold; and initiating, by the NAP agent based at least on determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold, a machine-controlled risk-alleviation action that alleviates one or more risks considered in the determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold. 2. The method of claim i where the level of risk corresponds to a reputation of software on the computing device. 3. The method of claim 1 where the determining is further based on an assessment that comprises monitoring components of the computing device. 4. The method of claim 3 where the determining is further in response risk factors identified by the assessment. 5. The method of claim 4 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a host security profile of the computing device. 6. The method of claim 4 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a network security profile of the computing device. 7. The method of claim 4 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a software risk profile of the computing device. 8. At least one computer storage medium storing computer-readable instructions that, based on execution by a computing device that includes a network access protection (“NAP”) agent, configure the computing device to: determine, based on communication over a network between the NAP and a NAP server, whether a level of risk associated with the computing device crosses a threshold; and initiate, by the NAP agent based at least on determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold, a machine-controlled risk-alleviation action that alleviates one or more risks considered in the determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold. 9. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 8 where the level of risk is determined to cross the threshold in response to a change in a security state of the computing device. 10. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 9 where the level of risk is further determined to cross the threshold based on an assessment that comprises monitoring components of the computing device. 11. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 10 where the level of risk is further determined to cross the threshold in response to risk factors identified by the assessment. 12. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 11 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a host security profile of the computing device. 13. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 11 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a network security profile of the computing device. 14. The at least one computer storage medium of claim 11 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a software risk profile of the computing device. 15. A system comprising: a network access protection (“NAP”) agent; and a computing device configured according to computer-executable instructions to: determine, based on communication over a network between the NAP and a NAP server, whether a level of risk associated with the computing device crosses a threshold; and initiate, by the NAP agent based at least on determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold, a machine-controlled risk-alleviation action that alleviates one or more risks considered in the determining that the level of risk crosses the threshold. 16. The system of claim 15 where the level of risk is determined to cross the threshold in response to a change in a security state of the computing device. 17. The system of claim 16 where the level of risk is further determined to cross the threshold based on an assessment that comprises monitoring components of the computing device, or where the level of risk is further determined to cross the threshold in response to risk factors identified by the assessment. 18. The system of claim 17 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a host security profile of the computing device, where the host security profile indicates a security framework on the computing device. 19. The system of claim 17 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a network security profile of the computing device. 20. The system of claim 17 where the assessment identifies risk factors indicated by a software risk profile of the computing device.
Restricting access to network management systems or functions, e.g. using authorisation function to access network configuration · CPC title
Event detection, e.g. attack signature detection · CPC title
Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.