Method and apparatus for selecting a router in an infinite link network
US-2015195187-A1 · Jul 9, 2015 · US
US9819583B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9819583-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514609376-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 29, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jan 29, 2015 |
| Publication date | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 14, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Aspects of the present invention include selecting a route based on energy cost. Energy cost is evaluated based on a power metric. The power metric is determined based on an energy cost related attribute and a corresponding weight. In embodiments of the present invention, money can be saved based on electricity savings. In embodiments of the present invention “green” power can be used more often than fossil fuel power.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for facilitating a routing decision that considers power related to a networking device as a factor in the routing decision, the method comprising: calculating a power per port value of the networking device by measuring power consumed by the networking device in a time period; determining a power metric to be used as a factor when making a routing decision, the power metric comprising an attribute determined using the power per port value and an energy cost for the networking device and a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the power metric; selecting a route using, at least in part, the power metric; and routing data based upon the selected route. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting a route using, at least in part, the power metric further comprises using at least one power metric received in a communication from another networking device. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the power metric comprises a weighted sum of a plurality of attributes with each attribute being multiplied by a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the weighted sum. 4. The method of claim 3 wherein at least one of the attributes and the weights has a predetermined value. 5. The method of claim 3 wherein at least one of the attributes and the weights has a dynamically defined value. 6. The method of claim 3 wherein the power metric represents a weighted arithmetic mean of the weighted sum of the plurality of attributes. 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising including a value representing the power metric in a communication that complies with a protocol and wherein the protocol is an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a link cost, which is used when making a routing decision. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the link cost also considers at least one additional routing metric comprising bandwidth, speed, and latency. 9. The method of claim 1 further comprising including a value representing the power metric in a communication that complies with a protocol and wherein the protocol is an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a Multi Exit Discriminator (MED) value, which is used when making a routing decision. 10. A non-transitory computer readable medium or media comprising one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, causes steps for facilitating a routing decision that considers power related to a networking device as a factor in the routing decision comprising: calculating a power per port value of the networking device by measuring power consumed by the networking device in a time period; determining a power metric to be used as a factor when making a routing decision, the power metric comprising an attribute determined using the power per port value and an energy cost for the networking device and a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the power metric; selecting a route using, at least in part, the power metric; and routing data based upon the selected route. 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 10 wherein the step of selecting a route using, at least in part, the power metric further comprises using at least one power metric received in a communication from another networking device. 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 10 wherein the power metric comprises a weighted sum of a plurality of attributes with each attribute being multiplied by a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the weighted sum. 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 12 wherein the power metric represents a weighted arithmetic mean of the weighted sum of the plurality of attributes. 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 10 further comprising including a value representing the power metric in a communication that complies with a protocol and wherein the protocol is an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a link cost, which is used when making a routing decision. 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 14 wherein the link cost also considers at least one additional routing metric comprising bandwidth, speed, and latency. 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium or media of claim 10 further comprising including a value representing the power metric in a communication that complies with a protocol and wherein the protocol is an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a Multi Exit Discriminator (MED) value, which is used when making a routing decision. 17. A networking device that can facilitate a routing decision that considers power related to the networking device as a factor in the routing decision, the networking device comprising: one or more processors; a plurality of ports communicatively coupled to at least one of the one or more processors; a non-transitory computer-readable medium or media comprising one or more sequences of instructions which, when executed by at least one of the one or more processors, causes steps to be performed comprising: calculating a power per port value of the networking device by measuring power consumed by the networking device in a time period; determining a power metric to be used as a factor when making a routing decision, the power metric comprising an attribute determined using the power per port value and an energy cost for the networking device and a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the power metric; selecting a route using, at least in part, the power metric; and routing data based upon the selected route; and at least one supply power for suppling power to the information handling system. 18. The networking device of claim 17 further comprising: a power measurement circuitry including point of load circuitry for measuring telemetry data associated with a plurality of components within the networking device while the networking device is operational and supplies at least some telemetry data to a profiling module that calculate the power per port value of the networking device using at least some of the telemetry data. 19. The networking device of claim 17 wherein the power metric comprises a weighted sum of a plurality of attributes with each attribute being multiplied by a corresponding weight that influences the attribute's overall importance in the weighted sum. 20. The networking device of claim 17 further comprising including a value representing the power metric in a communication that complies with a protocol and wherein the protocol is at least one of: an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a link cost, which is used when making a routing decision; and an Exterior Gateway Protocol (EGP) routing protocol and the power metric is factored into a Multi Exit Discriminator (MED) value, which is used when making a routing decision.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.