Biller consortium enrollment and transaction management engine
US-2024127230-A1 · Apr 18, 2024 · US
US9818089B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9818089-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414323606-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 3, 2014 |
| Priority date | Aug 23, 2001 |
| Publication date | Nov 14, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 14, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and method for making funds of a transaction available to a user before a funding entry clears is provided. The system may be part of an on-line system configured to facilitate payments or fund transfers from users. In example embodiments, a transaction request from a user is received. A risk score indicating a perceived risk involved with releasing funds before the funding entry clears is computed. Funds of the transaction are caused to be released prior to the funding entry clearing a financial institution based on the risk score exceeding a transfer threshold.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claim is: 1. A method, comprising: configuring a risk score generator based on at least a plurality of risk conditions associated with an Automated Clearing House (ACH) process; receiving, from a user device, a request for an amount associated with a data entry of the ACH process, wherein the ACH process comprises a time delay for the data entry to clear the ACH process, and wherein the request for the amount comprises a digital certificate associated with a user and a transaction certificate associated with the request for the amount; comparing the digital certificate to a stored digital certificate associated with the user and the transaction certificate to transaction data received from a third party; determining, responsive to the comparing, a likelihood of trust in an indicated identity of the user; deteimining, with the risk score generator and based at least on the likelihood of trust, a first risk score associated with the requested amount that exceeds a transfer threshold, wherein the first risk score indicates a risk with releasing the requested amount before the data entry clears the ACH process; and making the requested amount associated with the data entry available before the data entry clears the ACH process based at least on the first risk score exceeding the transfer threshold, wherein the time delay is eliminated based at least on the requested amount made available before the data entry clears the ACH process. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the data entry is an ACH entry, and wherein the requested amount of the ACH entry is available before the ACH entry clears the ACH process based at least on the first risk score exceeding the transfer threshold. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, based at least on the requested amount of the data entry being greater than a predetermined amount, initiating a hold against a credit source from providing a portion of the requested amount. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining, with the risk score generator, a second risk score associated with a second requested amount that does not exceed the transfer threshold; and based at least on the second risk score not exceeding the transfer threshold, requesting the user device to alter a detail of the second requested amount with a credit source. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first risk score is determined based at least on a number of ACH entries in association with a user profile, and wherein making the requested amount available is further based on the number of ACH entries compared to a maximum number of ACH entries. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein a user profile that corresponds to the requested amount indicates a rejection ratio that indicates a number of unsuccessful data entries over a number of ACH entries requested. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the request for the amount comprises a request to alter the amount, a request for a source of the amount, and a request for a change to the data entry that comprises an ACH entry. 8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising; determining, with the risk score generator, a second risk score associated with a second requested amount that does not exceed the transfer threshold; and initiating a hold against a credit source based at least on the second risk score not exceeding the transfer threshold. 9. A non-transitory machine-readable medium having stored thereon machine-readable instructions executable to cause a machine to perfom operations comprising: configuring a risk score generator based at least on a plurality of risk conditions associated with an Automated Clearing House (ACH) process; receiving, from a user device, a request for an amount associated with a data entry of the ACH process, wherein the ACH process comprises a time delay for the data entry to clear the ACH process, and wherein the request for the amount comprises a digital certificate associated with a user and a transaction certificate associated with the request for the amount; comparing the digital certificate to a stored digital certificate associated with the user and the transaction certificate to transaction data received from a third party; determining a likelihood of trust in an indicated identity of the user responsive to the comparing; determining, with the risk score generator and based at least on the likelihood of trust, a first risk score associated with the requested amount that exceeds a transfer threshold, wherein the first risk score indicates a risk with releasing the requested amount before the data entry clears the ACH process; and making the requested amount of the data entry available before the data entry clears the ACH process based at least on the first risk score exceeding the transfer threshold without requiring the time delay to be met based at least on the requested amount made available before the data entry clears the ACH process. 10. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: determining, with the risk score generator, a second risk score associated with a second requested amount that does not exceed the transfer threshold, and based at least on the second risk score not exceeding the transfer threshold, making the second requested amount available with a credit source. 11. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the first risk score is determined based at least on a number of ACH entries associated with a user profile, and wherein making the requested amount available is based at least on the number of ACH entries being less than a maximum allowable number of ACH entries. 12. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: determining, with the risk score generator, a second risk score associated with a second requested amount that does not exceed the transfer threshold; and based at least on the second risk score not exceeding the transfer threshold, requesting the user device to alter a detail of the second requested amount. 13. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein requesting the user device to alter the detail of the second requested amount comprises a request for a source of the second requested amount, and a request for a change to the data entry of the second requested amount that comprises an ACH entry. 14. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: determining, with the risk score generator, a second risk score associated with a second requested amount that does not exceed the transfer threshold; and initiating a hold against a credit source based at least on the second risk score not exceeding the transfer threshold. 15. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the data entry is an ACH entry, and wherein the requested amount of the ACH entry is available before the ACH entry clears the ACH process based at least on the first risk score exceeding the transfer threshold. 16. A system, comprising: a non-transitory memory; and one or more hardware processors coupled to at least the non-transitory memory and configured to read instructions from the non-transitory memory to cause the system to perform operations comprising: configuring a risk score generator of the one or more hardware processors based at least on a plurality of risk conditions associated with an Automated Clearing House (ACH) process; receiving, from a user device, a request for an amount associated with a data entry for the ACH process, wherein the AC
Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes · CPC title
Credit; Loans; Processing thereof · CPC title
involving fraud or risk level assessment in transaction processing · CPC title
Remote banking, e.g. home banking · CPC title
Asset management; Financial planning or analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.