Adaptive microphone array compensation
US-9363598-B1 · Jun 7, 2016 · US
US9813833B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9813833-B1 |
| Application number | US-201615294304-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Oct 14, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 14, 2016 |
| Publication date | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 7, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method, apparatus and computer program product provide an improved filter calibration procedure to reliably equalize the long term spectrum of the audio signals captured by first and second microphones that are at different locations relative to a sound source and/or are of different types. In the context of a method, the signals captured by the first and second microphones are analyzed. The method also determines one or more quality measures based on the analysis. In an instance in which one or more quality measure satisfy a predefined condition, the method determines a frequency response of the signals captured by the first and second microphones. The method also determines a difference between the frequency response of the signals captured by the first and second microphones and processes the signals captured by the first microphone for filtering relative to the signals captured by the second microphone based upon the difference.
Opening claim text (preview).
That which is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: analyzing respective signals captured by each of the first and second microphones; determining one or more quality measures based on the analysis; in an instance in which the one or more quality measures satisfy a predefined condition, determining frequency responses of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; determining a difference between the frequency response of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; and processing the signal captured by the first microphone with a filter to correspondingly filter the signal captured by the first microphone relative to the signal captured by the second microphone based upon the difference. 2. A method according to claim 1 wherein analyzing the signals comprises determining a cross-correlation measure between the signals captured by the first and second microphones. 3. A method according to claim 2 wherein determining one or more quality measures comprises determining a quality measure based upon a ratio of a maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation measure to a sum of absolute values of the cross-correlation measure. 4. A method according to claim 2 wherein determining one or more quality measures comprises determining a quality measure based upon a standard deviation of one or more prior locations of a maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation measure. 5. A method according to claim 1 further comprising repeatedly analyzing the signals and determining the frequency responses in an instance in which the one or more quality measures satisfy the predefined condition for the signals captured by the first and second microphones during each of a plurality of different time windows. 6. A method according to claim 5 further comprising estimating an average frequency response based on the signal captured by the first microphone and dependent on an estimated frequency response based on the signal captured by the second microphone during each of the plurality of different time windows. 7. A method according to claim 5 further comprising aggregating the different time windows for which the one or more quality measures satisfy a predefined condition, and wherein determining the difference is dependent upon an aggregation of the time windows satisfying a predetermined condition. 8. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first microphone is closer to a sound source than the second microphone. 9. An apparatus comprising at least one processor and at least one memory comprising computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to: analyze respective signals captured by each of the first and second microphones; determine one or more quality measures based on the analysis; in an instance in which the one or more quality measures satisfy a predefined condition, determine frequency responses of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; determine a difference between the frequency responses of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; and process the signal captured by the first microphone with a filter to correspondingly filter the signal captured by the first microphone relative to the signal captured by the second microphone based upon the difference. 10. An apparatus according to claim 9 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to analyze the signals by determining a cross-correlation measure between the signals captured by the first and second microphones. 11. An apparatus according to claim 10 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to determine one or more quality measures by determining a quality measure based upon a ratio of a maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation measure to a sum of absolute values of the cross-correlation measure. 12. An apparatus according to claim 10 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to determine one or more quality measures by determining a quality measure based upon a standard deviation of one or more prior locations of a maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation measure. 13. An apparatus according to claim 9 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to repeatedly analyze the signals and determine the frequency responses in an instance in which the one or more quality measures satisfy the predefined condition for the signals captured by the first and second microphones during each of a plurality of different time windows. 14. An apparatus according to claim 13 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to estimate an average frequency response based on the signal captured by the first microphone and dependent on an estimated frequency response based on the signal captured by the second microphone during each of the plurality of different time windows. 15. An apparatus according to claim 13 wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to aggregate the different time windows for which the one or more quality measures based on the similarity analysis satisfy a predefined condition, and wherein determining the difference is dependent upon an aggregation of the time windows satisfying a predetermined condition. 16. An apparatus according to claim 9 wherein the first microphone is closer to a sound source than the second microphone. 17. A computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code portions stored therein, the computer-executable program code portions comprising program code instructions configured to: analyze respective signals captured by each of the first and second microphones; determine one or more quality measures based on the analysis; in an instance in which the one or more quality measures satisfy a predefined condition, determine frequency responses of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; determine a difference between the frequency responses of the signals captured by the first and second microphones; and process the signal captured by the first microphone with a filter to correspondingly filter the signal captured by the first microphone relative to the signal captured by the second microphone based upon the difference. 18. A computer program product according to claim 17 wherein the program code instructions configured to analyze the signals comprise program code instructions configured to determine a cross-correlation measure between the signals captured by the first and second microphones. 19. A computer program product according to claim 18 wherein the program code instructions configured to determine one or more quality measures comprise program code instructions configured to determine at least one of a quality measure based upon a ratio of a maximum absolute value of the cross-correlation measure to a sum of absolute values of the cross-correlation measure or a standard deviation of one or more prior locations of the maximum absolu
Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing · CPC title
for correcting frequency response · CPC title
for combining the signals of two or more microphones (specially adapted for hearing aids H04R25/407) · CPC title
Microphone matching · CPC title
Transducers incorporated or for use in hand-held devices, e.g. mobile phones, PDA's, camera's · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.