Vehicle information recording system and vehicle information recording apparatus
US-2024362959-A1 · Oct 31, 2024 · US
US9811950B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9811950-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414490495-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 18, 2014 |
| Priority date | Sep 18, 2014 |
| Publication date | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 7, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An aircraft electric taxi system diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method, including receiving, with a computer, an electronically recorded first performance parameter of a first electric taxi system of a first aircraft during a taxi operational event at an airport; and comparing the first performance parameter with a first performance factor statistical model generated in response to the first performance parameter and first comparative performance parameters; and calculating a first performance parameter difference based on the comparison.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method for aircraft electric taxi systems (ETS), comprising: receiving, with a computer, an electronically recorded first performance parameter of a first ETS of a first aircraft during a taxi operational event of the first aircraft at an airport; receiving, with the computer, electronically recorded first comparative performance parameters corresponding to the first performance parameter from electric taxi systems of multiple aircraft during corresponding taxi operational events of the multiple aircraft at the airport; generating, with the computer, a first performance factor statistical model in response to the first performance parameter and the first comparative performance parameters; comparing the first performance parameter of the first aircraft with the first performance factor statistical model; and calculating a first performance parameter difference based on the comparison; generating a first aircraft electric taxi system maintenance problem report when the first performance parameter difference exceeds a predetermined acceptable first performance parameter difference value; wherein the taxi operational event of the first aircraft and the corresponding taxi operational event of the multiple aircraft include an ETS operation at a steady state speed; wherein the first performance parameter includes one of a speed obtained during ETS operation at steady state speed and power used by the APU to power the ETS during the ETS operation at steady state speed, or fuel used by the APU to power the ETS during the ETS operation at steady state speed; receiving, with the computer, electronically recorded taxi data and aircraft identification information from the first aircraft with an electric taxi system, the taxi data including position of the first aircraft and corresponding auxiliary power unit status, electric taxi system status, and aircraft speed for each takeoff of the first aircraft and each landing of the first aircraft for a predetermined fuel reporting time period; determining, with the computer, electric taxi system use time periods during all first aircraft taxis to takeoff or first aircraft taxis after landing for the predetermined fuel reporting time period during which motive power was supplied to the first aircraft from the electric taxi system, in response to the taxi data; determining, with the computer, an electric taxi system configuration, an aircraft configuration, and a main engine configuration of the first aircraft in response to the aircraft identification information; estimating, with a computer electric taxi system performance model or in response to a fuel level signal, an amount of fuel used by an APU (auxiliary power unit) of the first aircraft to power the ETS system during each electric taxi system use time period in response to the taxi data and the electric taxi system configuration; estimating, with a computer aircraft performance model, an amount of fuel which would have been used by the main engines of the first aircraft during each electric taxi system use time period if main engines of the first aircraft had supplied motive power to the first aircraft, in response to the taxi data, aircraft configuration, and main engine configuration; calculating with the computer, a first aircraft amount of fuel saved based on the amount of fuel used by the APU and the amount of fuel which would have been used by the main engines for at least one first aircraft takeoff or first aircraft landing during the fuel reporting period; determining, with the computer, main engine use reporting time periods during all first aircraft taxis to takeoff or first aircraft taxis after landing for the predetermined fuel reporting time period during which motive power was supplied to the first aircraft from the main engines, in response to the taxi data; estimating, with the computer aircraft performance model or in response to a fuel level signal, an amount of fuel used by the first aircraft during each main engine use reporting time period in response to the taxi data, the aircraft configuration, and the main engine configuration; estimating, with the computer electric taxi system performance model, an amount of fuel which would have been used by the first aircraft during each main engine use reporting time period if the ETS system of the first aircraft had supplied motive power to the first aircraft, in response to the taxi data and the electric taxi system configuration; and calculating with the computer, a first aircraft amount of fuel which would have been saved based on the amount of fuel used by the main engines and the amount of fuel which would have been used by the APU for at least one first aircraft takeoff or first aircraft landing during the fuel reporting time period. 2. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the first aircraft has a model and each of the multiple aircraft have the same model as the first aircraft. 3. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi operational event and the corresponding taxi operational event include an ETS turn performance operational event. 4. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 3 , wherein the first performance parameter includes a maximum nose wheel side load during the ETS turn performance operational event. 5. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi operational event and the corresponding taxi operational event include an ETS acceleration operational event. 6. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 5 , wherein the first performance parameter includes one of a time to a commanded speed during the ETS acceleration operational event, power used by the APU to power the ETS during the ETS acceleration operational event, or fuel used by the APU to power the ETS during the ETS acceleration operational event. 7. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi operational event and the corresponding taxi operational event include an ETS deceleration operational event. 8. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 7 , wherein the first performance parameter includes a time to a zero speed during the ETS deceleration operational event. 9. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi operational event and the corresponding taxi operational event occur while there is a significant environmental condition at the airport. 10. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi operational event and the corresponding taxi operational event occur at the same airport. 11. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , wherein the taxi data includes motor voltage and motor current and wherein the amount of fuel used by an APU of the first aircraft to power the ETS system during each ETS-use reporting time period is estimated in response to the motor voltage and the motor current. 12. The diagnostics and prognostics evaluation method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving, with the computer, electronically recorded taxi data and aircraft identification information from a second aircraft with an electric taxi system, the taxi data including position and corresponding auxiliary power unit status, electric taxi system status, and aircraft speed for each second aircraft takeoff and each second aircraft landing for the predetermined fuel reporting time period; determining, with the computer, second ETS-use reporting time periods during all second aircraft takeoffs or second aircraft landings for the predet
Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL] (preventive maintenance, i.e. planning maintenance according to the available resources without monitoring the system G06Q10/06) · CPC title
Diagnosing performance data (testing of vehicles G01M17/00; testing of electrical installation on vehicles G01R31/005) · CPC title
Powered wheels, e.g. for taxing · CPC title
Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic
Energy efficient operational measures, e.g. ground operations or mission management · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.