Hybrid Fitting for a Visual Prosthesis
US-2016303373-A1 · Oct 20, 2016 · US
US9808625B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9808625-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615144616-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 2, 2016 |
| Priority date | May 1, 2015 |
| Publication date | Nov 7, 2017 |
| Grant date | Nov 7, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention is an improved spatial fitting and training system for a visual prosthesis. The system of the present invention maps projected locations of percepts, where a person perceives a percept from a visual prosthesis to the intended location of the percepts. The projected location may vary over time. This test results can be used to correct a visual prosthesis or spatially map the visual prosthesis.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method fitting a visual prosthesis comprising: providing a touch screen monitor connected to a computer: projecting an image on the touch screen monitor in an actual location; asking a subject to indicate the perceived location of the image by touching the touch screen monitor; providing feed back to subject as the accuracy of the perceived location; calculating a difference between the actual location and the perceived location in the computer; and adjusting the visual prosthesis based on the difference. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: repeating the steps of claim 1 , at different times; storing the difference in the computer for each of the different times; and refining the adjustment of the visual prosthesis by stored difference values. 3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: recording a camera sampling position of the visual prosthesis camera; and refining the adjustment of the visual prosthesis by the camera sampling position. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the feedback is auditory feedback. 5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the auditory feedback is an indication of right or wrong. 6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the auditory feedback is an indication of the direction and distance of the error. 7. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: calculating a confidence interval based on error rates; and excluding data with a confidence interval less that a predetermined minimum. 8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the predetermined minimum is 95%. 9. The method according to claim 7 , wherein the confidence interval is calculated by t-distributions. 10. The method according to claim 7 , further comprising calculating separate confidence intervals for vertical and horizontal errors and excluding data with vertical confidence interval of less than a predetermined amount, and excluding data with a horizontal confidence interval of less than a predetermined amount. 11. The method according to claim 10 , wherein the predetermined amount is 95%.
of the eye · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Retinal electrodes · CPC title
User interfaces, e.g. input or presentation means · CPC title
relating to mental therapies, e.g. psychological therapy or autogenous training · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.