Online frequency response characterization system and method

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9798318-B2
Application number	US-201414252444-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Apr 14, 2014
Priority date	Apr 14, 2014
Publication date	Oct 24, 2017
Grant date	Oct 24, 2017

Abstract

A system may include a controller that may control operations of a device according to a control loop and characterize a frequency response of the device while the device is operating. The controller may characterize the frequency response by adding a perturbation signal to any signal in the control loop. The controller may then determine a first transformed signal by performing a first discrete Fourier transform on a first signal in the control loop at a frequency of the perturbation signal and determine a second transformed signal by performing a second discrete Fourier transform on a second signal in the control loop at the frequency of the perturbation signal. The controller may then determine the frequency response at the frequency by comparing a first amplitude and a first phase of the first transformed signal to a second amplitude and a second phase of the second transformed signal.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A system, comprising:
a controller configured to:
control one or more operations of a device according to a control loop; and
characterize a frequency response of the device while the device is operating by:
adding a perturbation signal to a signal representing a difference between a desired measurement output of the control loop and a measurement output of the control loop;
determining a first transformed signal by performing a first discrete Fourier transform on a first signal in the control loop at a frequency that corresponds to the perturbation signal;
determining a second transformed signal by performing a second discrete Fourier transform on a second signal in the control loop at the frequency that corresponds to the perturbation signal, wherein the second signal comprises the measurement output of the control loop; and
determining the frequency response at the frequency by comparing a first amplitude and a first phase of the first transformed signal to a second amplitude and a second phase of the second transformed signal.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the device comprises an industrial plant, a turbine, a compressor, a motor, a generator, a gasifier, a gas treatment system, a heat recovery steam generator, a combustion system, a reactor, an industrial machine, a fluid-based system, or any combination thereof.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the perturbation signal comprises a square wave, a triangle wave, a sawtooth wave, or a sinc wave.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the perturbation signal comprises a monochromatic sinusoid wave.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the perturbation signal comprises a third amplitude configured not to affect the one or more operations in the control loop.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to perform the first discrete Fourier transform on the first signal by setting a period of the first signal to an integer multiple of a sampling period of the first signal.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to perform the first discrete Fourier transform on the first signal and the second discrete Fourier transform on the second signal by extracting a frequency component of interest for the first signal and the second signal.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to determine the first transformed signal and the second transformed signal by:
averaging the first transformed signal over a number of signal periods; and
averaging the second transformed signal over the number of signal periods.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the controller is configured to determine the frequency response at the frequency comprises comparing a third amplitude and a third phase of the averaged first transformed signal to a fourth amplitude and a fourth phase of the averaged second transformed signal.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to apply a window function to the first signal and the second before determining the first transformed signal and the second transformed signal.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the window function comprises a Blackman-Harris function, a Hamming function, a Gaussian function, or a Bartlett-Hann function.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein the controller is configured to determine the frequency response at the frequency by computing a complex ratio between the first transformed signal and the second transformed signal.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein the control loop is an open loop.

14. A tangible, non-transitory, machine-readable medium, comprising machine-readable instructions to, when executed, cause a processor to:
add a perturbation signal to an error signal representing a difference between a desired measurement output of a control system and a measurement output of the control system, thereby generating a perturbation-error signal;
perform a discrete Fourier transform on the perturbation-error signal and the measurement output at a frequency that corresponds to the perturbation signal, thereby determining a transformed perturbation-error signal and a transformed measurement output;
compare a first amplitude and a first phase of the transformed perturbation-error signal to a second amplitude and a second phase of the transformed measurement output, thereby determining a frequency response of the control system at the frequency; and
control, by the control system, a device while the frequency response is determined.

15. The machine-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the machine-readable instructions to compare the first amplitude and the first phase of the transformed perturbation-error signal to the second amplitude and the second phase of the transformed measurement output comprises determining a ratio between a first absolute value of the transformed measurement output to a second absolute value of the transformed perturbation-error signal.

16. The machine-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein the perturbation signal comprises a square wave, a triangle wave, a sawtooth wave, a sinc wave, or a monochromatic sinusoid wave.

17. The machine-readable medium of claim 14 , comprising machine-readable instructions to provide the perturbation-error signal to a controller configured to operate the device in the control system.

18. The machine-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the perturbation signal in the perturbation-error signal is negligible by the controller.

19. A method, comprising:
receiving, via a processor, a range of frequencies;
adding, via the processor, one or more perturbation signals at one or more frequencies of the range to a node of a control loop in a control system, wherein the node comprises an error signal representing a difference between a desired measurement output of the control system and a measurement output of the control system;
performing, via the processor, one or more discrete Fourier transforms on at least two signals in the control loop at each of the one or more frequencies, thereby determining at least two transformed signals at each of the one or more frequencies, wherein one of the at least two signals comprise the measurement output of the control system;
determining, via the processor, a complex ratio between any two of the at least two transformed signals at each of the one or more frequencies, thereby determining one or more frequency responses of the control system at the one or more frequencies; and
controlling, by the control system, a device while the one or more frequency responses is determined.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the control system comprises a controller, the device, and a sensor, wherein the controller is configured to control the device, and wherein the sensor measures an output of the device.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the complex ratio is determined while the control system is operating.

Assignees

• Gen Electric

Inventors

• Cheta Ahmed My
• Shepard Mark Eugene
• Hendrickson Seth Andrew
• Laskowski Benjamin David
• Adasa Patrick Nkrumah
• Aljahmi Mohamed Ahmed
• Mcarthur Andrew David

Classifications

• G06F17/141 Primary

  Discrete Fourier transforms · CPC title

• G05B2219/41417

  Correction signal is different as function of sign of error · CPC title

• G05B19/4184 Primary

  characterised by fault tolerance, reliability of production system · CPC title

• Y02P90/14

  Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic

• Y02P90/02

  Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] · CPC title