Method and apparatus for checking a value document

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9792750-B2
Application number	US-201214365717-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 19, 2012
Priority date	Dec 21, 2011
Publication date	Oct 17, 2017
Grant date	Oct 17, 2017

Abstract

There is described a method for checking a value document of a specified type for the suspected presence of a forgery, in particular of a pieced-together forgery, wherein at least one ultrasonic property of the value document is captured in a spatially resolved manner so as to form location-dependent measuring data, wherein while employing the location-dependent measuring data it is checked whether there are present in a specified checking region of the value document two areal regions whose ultrasonic properties deviate from each other according to a specified difference criterion, and wherein there is formed an authenticity signal which represents the result of the check. Further, a corresponding checking device is described.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A method for checking a value document of a specified type for a suspected presence of a forgery, the method comprising:
transmitting and receiving ultrasonic waves such that at least one ultrasonic property of the value document can be determined;
determining said at least one ultrasonic property of the value document in a spatially resolved manner so as to form location-dependent measuring data;
checking, while employing the location-dependent measuring data, whether two areal regions including a first areal region and a second areal region are present in a specified checking region of the value document, so that the at least one ultrasonic property has a specified first course at locations in the first areal region of the value document, and the at least one ultrasonic property in the first areal region and the at least one ultrasonic property in the second areal region of the value document deviate from each other according to a specified difference criterion; and
forming an authenticity signal which represents the result of the check.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of determining the at least one ultrasonic property includes emitting ultrasound onto the value document and capturing ultrasound transmitted by the value document.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the step of checking whether the two areal regions are present in the specified checking region of the value document includes forming and employing averages over the measuring data over at least three neighboring locations for establishing the course in the first areal region and/or when checking the specified difference criterion.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the specified first course is such that in the first areal region according to a specified criterion the at least one ultrasonic property is location-independent, or that the measurement values representing the at least one ultrasonic property in the measuring data are location-independent, and wherein the difference criterion contains the subcriterion of whether a weight per unit area of the first and second areal regions corresponding to the measuring data, or weights per unit area represented by the measuring data, differ by at least 5 g/m 2 .

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the specified first course represents a local pattern of the at least one ultrasonic property, said pattern being specified for the type of the value document, and the difference criterion contains the subcriterion of whether the measuring data for the second areal region represent a deviating, or no, local pattern of the at least one ultrasonic property.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein, when checking whether the two areal regions are present, only those areal regions are taken into consideration whose surface areas exceed a specified minimum surface area.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the value document has a circumferential edge, and wherein, when checking whether the two areal regions are present, only those areal regions are taken into consideration that are limited by at least two portions of the edge that do not extend colinearly.

8. The method according to claim 1 , which is designed for checking value documents of at least two different specified value-document types, and wherein a value-document type of the value document is established, and the checking region is fixed in dependence on the established value-document type.

9. A device for checking value documents at least of one specified type, the device comprising:
an ultrasonic sensor that includes a transmitter configured to transmit ultrasonic waves such that at least one ultrasonic property of the value document of value can be determined, and the ultrasonic sensor is configured to determine in a spatially resolved manner said at least one ultrasonic property of the value document transported through a capture region of the ultrasonic sensor so as to form location-dependent measuring data; and
an evaluation device which is configured to
receive the measuring data of the ultrasonic sensor,
check while employing the location-dependent measuring data whether two areal regions including a first areal region and a second areal region are present in a specified checking region of the value document, so that the at least one ultrasonic property has a specified first course at locations in the first areal region of the value document, and the at least one ultrasonic property in the first areal region and the at least one ultrasonic property in the second areal region of the value document deviate from each other according to a specified difference criterion, and
form an authenticity signal which represents the result of the check.

10. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the ultrasonic sensor is configured for emitting ultrasound onto the value document and capturing ultrasound transmitted by the value document.

11. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is further configured, when checking whether the two areal regions are present in the specified checking region of the value document, to form and employ averages over the measuring data over at least three neighboring locations to establish the course in the first areal region and/or when checking the distinguishing criterion.

12. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is so configured that the specified first course is such that in the first areal region according to a specified criterion the at least one ultrasonic property is location-independent, or that measurement values representing the at least one ultrasonic property in the measuring data are location-independent.

13. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is so configured that the difference criterion contains the subcriterion of whether a weight per unit area of the first and second areal the areal regions corresponding to the measuring data differ by at least 5 g/m 2 .

14. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is so configured that the specified first course represents a local pattern of the at least one ultrasonic property, said pattern being specified for the type of the value document, and the difference criterion contains the subcriterion of whether the measuring data for the second areal region represent a deviating, or no, local pattern of the at least one ultrasonic property.

15. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is further configured such that, when checking whether the two areal regions are present, only those areal regions are taken into consideration whose surface areas exceed a specified minimum surface area.

16. The device according to claim 9 , wherein the evaluation device is so configured that, when checking whether the two areal regions are present, only those areal regions are taken into consideration that are limited by portions of a circumferential edge of the value document that do not extend colinearly.

17. The device according to claim 9 , which is adapted for checking value documents of at least two different specified value-document types, and wherein the evaluation device is so configured that the checking region is fixed in dependence on an established value-document type of the value document.

18. An apparatus for processing value documents having
a feeding device for value documents to be processed;
an output device for value documents which has at least two output portions for receiving processed value documents;
a tran

Assignees

• Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh
• Giesecke & Devrient Currency Technology Gmbh

Inventors

• Domke Jan
• Scholz Ingo

Classifications

• G07D7/08 Primary

  Acoustic waves · CPC title

• G01N29/4454

  Signal recognition, e.g. specific values or portions, signal events, signatures · CPC title

• G01N29/07

  by measuring propagation velocity or propagation time of acoustic waves · CPC title

• G01N29/04

  Analysing solids (using acoustic emission techniques G01N29/14) · CPC title

• G01N29/11

  by measuring attenuation of acoustic waves · CPC title