Proof testing brittle components of electronic devices
US-2017089818-A1 · Mar 30, 2017 · US
US9784717B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9784717-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414462092-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 18, 2014 |
| Priority date | Sep 30, 2013 |
| Publication date | Oct 10, 2017 |
| Grant date | Oct 10, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
In some embodiments, processes for testing for structural flaws in sapphire parts such as display cover plates used in the manufacturing of electronic devices are disclosed. A process may include transmitting a destructive acoustic signal onto a sapphire part, and determining whether the sapphire part failed in response to the destructive signal. The destructive acoustic signal may include a Rayleigh acoustic wave, wherein the destructive acoustic signal breaks the sapphire part if the sapphire part has a surface flaw larger than a specified size. In this manner, only sapphire parts that can withstand the destructive acoustic signal are used in manufacturing of the electronic device.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A process for testing for structural flaws in sapphire parts used in the manufacturing of electronic devices, comprising: transmitting a destructive acoustic signal including a Rayleigh wave onto a sapphire part; and determining whether the sapphire part mechanically failed in response to the transmitting of the destructive acoustic signal. 2. The process of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the sapphire part mechanically failed further comprises at least one of: determining whether the destructive acoustic signal breaks the sapphire part; and determining whether the destructive acoustic signal creates a surface flaw in the sapphire part larger than a specified size. 3. The process of claim 2 , wherein the specified size of the surface flaw in the sapphire part is dependent on at least one of: a size of the sapphire part; a desired strength of the sapphire part; and a desired robustness of the sapphire part. 4. The process of claim 2 , wherein the determining whether the sapphire part mechanically failed in response to the destructive signal further comprises determining whether the surface flaw is larger than a sub-micron in size. 5. The process of claim 1 , further comprising, in response to determining that the sapphire part mechanically failed, discarding the sapphire part. 6. The process of claim 1 , wherein the sapphire part is configured to be used as a cover plate for a display of the electronic device. 7. The process of claim 1 , wherein the electronic device is a mobile phone. 8. The process of claim 2 , wherein the Rayleigh wave has a frequency in the range of about 50 kHz to 2 GHz. 9. The process of claim 1 , wherein: the process further comprises submerging the sapphire part in a liquid; and the operation of transmitting the destructive acoustic signal onto the sapphire part is performed while the sapphire part is submerged. 10. The process of claim 1 , wherein: the sapphire part is a cover plate for an electronic device; the cover plate defines at least one opening therethrough; and transmitting the destructive acoustic signal onto the sapphire part comprises transmitting the destructive acoustic signal at a portion of the cover plate adjacent the opening. 11. A process for manufacturing an electronic device, comprising: generating and transmitting a destructive Rayleigh wave onto a sapphire part; determining whether the sapphire part mechanically failed in response to the transmitting of the destructive Rayleigh wave; and in response to determining the sapphire part did not mechanically fail, forming the electronic device using the sapphire part. 12. The process of claim 11 , wherein the forming of the electronic device using the sapphire part further comprises forming a mobile phone as the electronic device. 13. The process of claim 11 , wherein the determining whether the sapphire part mechanically failed in response to the transmitting of the destructive Rayleigh wave further comprises: performing a visual inspection of the sapphire part at least one of during, or after, the transmitting of the destructive Rayleigh wave onto the sapphire part; and determining if a surface flaw is larger than a specified flaw size of the sapphire part. 14. The process of claim 11 , wherein the transmitting of the destructive Rayleigh wave onto the sapphire part further comprises directing the destructive Rayleigh wave at a specific portion of the sapphire part.
including measuring or testing of device or component part · CPC title
Glass, ceramics, concrete or stone · CPC title
on the surface of the material, e.g. using Lamb, Rayleigh or shear waves · CPC title
one transducer · CPC title
flat · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.