Authorization method and apparatus
US-2024388909-A1 · Nov 21, 2024 · US
US9781129B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9781129-B1 |
| Application number | US-201213536978-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Jun 28, 2012 |
| Priority date | Mar 30, 2012 |
| Publication date | Oct 3, 2017 |
| Grant date | Oct 3, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
There is disclosed a method and system for use in authenticating an entity. An authentication request is received from the entity. An input signal is received from a communications device associated with the entity. The input signal comprises the current location of the communications device. The current location of the communications device is derived from the input signal. Based on the current location of the communications device, an event is detected at substantially the same location as the current location of the communications device. An analysis is performed between the current location of the communications device and the event. An authentication result is generated based on the analysis between the current location of the communications device and the event. The authentication result can be used for authenticating the entity.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for use in authenticating an entity, the method comprising steps of: receiving a request to authenticate the entity, the request comprising a current location of a communications device associated with the entity and a current time; based on the current location and the current time, evaluating event data to detect an event at an event location within a defined radius of the current location and an event time with a defined time period of the current time, wherein the event data comprises one or more entries including an event type, an event location and a timestamp, wherein the event type relates to one or more of a sporting event, a protest event, a cultural event, a musical event, a social event, a celebratory event, and a criminal event; determining a location difference and a time difference in connection with the event, wherein the location difference relates to a difference between the current location and the event location and the time difference relates to a difference between the current time and the event time; determining a risk score in connection with the request, wherein the risk score is dependent on the event type and the location difference and the time difference, further wherein the said determination of the risk score determines the extent of the location difference and the time difference such that the risk score will be higher when the current location and the current time are similar to the event location and the event time and the risk score will be lower than said higher risk score when one or more of the current location and the current time are dissimilar to the event location and the event time, the degree to which the risk score is lower being dependent on the extent of at least one of the location difference and the time difference; and based on the risk score, generating an authentication result for use in authenticating the entity; and wherein the steps are performed by at least one processing device comprising a processor coupled to a memory. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising: granting authentication in response to the risk score not exceeding a predefined threshold; and denying authentication in response to the risk score exceeding the predefined threshold. 3. A system for use in authenticating an entity, the system comprising a processor configured to: receive a request to authenticate the entity, the request comprising a current location of a communications device associated with the entity and a current time; based on the current location and the current time, evaluate event data to detect an event at an event location within a defined radius of the current location and an event time with a defined time period of the current time, wherein the event data comprises one or more entries including an event type, an event location and a timestamp, wherein the event type relates to one or more of a sporting event, a protest event, a cultural event, a musical event, a social event, a celebratory event, and a criminal event; determine a location difference and a time difference in connection with the event, wherein the location difference relates to a difference between the current location and the event location and the time difference relates to a difference between the current time and the event time; determine a risk score in connection with the request, wherein the risk score is dependent on the event type and the location difference and the time difference, further wherein the said determination of the risk score determines the extent of the location difference and the time difference such that the risk score will be higher when the current location and the current time are similar to the event location and the event time and the risk score will be lower than said higher risk score when one or more of the current location and the current time are dissimilar to the event location and the event time, the degree to which the risk score is lower being dependent on the extent of at least one of the location difference and the time difference; and based on the risk score, generate an authentication result for use in authenticating the entity. 4. The system as claimed in claim 3 , further comprising: grant authentication in response to the risk score not exceeding a predefined threshold; and deny authentication in response to the risk score exceeding the predefined threshold.
wherein the security policies are location-dependent, e.g. entities privileges depend on current location or allowing specific operations only from locally connected terminals · CPC title
Risk-dependent, e.g. selecting a security level depending on risk profiles · CPC title
Location-dependent; Proximity-dependent · CPC title
Time stamp · CPC title
Wireless · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.