Systems and methods for hyperledger-based payment transactions, alerts, and dispute settlement, using smart contracts
US-2024046230-A1 · Feb 8, 2024 · US
US9779073B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9779073-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414445787-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jul 29, 2014 |
| Priority date | Jul 29, 2014 |
| Publication date | Oct 3, 2017 |
| Grant date | Oct 3, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A first set of changes to a first version of a digital document, as compared to a baseline version of the document, can be detected. The first set of changes can include a first change to a page of the document in the first version of the document, as compared to the baseline version of the document. Also, a second set of changes to a second version of a document, as compared to the baseline version of the document, can be detected. The second set of changes can include a second change to the page of the document in the second version of the document, as compared to the baseline version of the document. A conflict between the first change and the second change can be detected, and the conflict can be resolved by receiving user input or applying conflict resolution rule(s) to choose between the first and second changes.
Opening claim text (preview).
We claim: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: detecting a conflict between a first change to a content portion of a digital document and a second change to the content portion of the digital document; determining whether the conflict between the first change and the second change is to be resolved automatically or whether the conflict requires manual user input to be resolved based on an application of conflict resolution logic that comprises applying at least one conflict rule to evaluate how the content portion is affected based on the first change and the second change; automatically resolving the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict relates to a property affecting presentation of the content portion; and providing a manual resolution prompt for a user to manually resolve the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict results in an amount of data loss to the content portion. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the property of the content portion is one or more selected from a group consisting of: a position, an orientation, a formatting and a size. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , wherein the conflict resolution logic selects the at least one conflict rule based on a classification of the conflict as a page-level conflict. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein when data loss is detected as a result of the conflict, the conflict resolution logic executes a threshold analysis associated with the amount of data loss. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the conflict resolution logic automatically resolves the conflict when the amount of data loss is below a threshold value based on the threshold analysis. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the conflict resolution logic requires manual resolution to resolve the conflict when the amount of data loss exceeds a threshold value based on the threshold analysis. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising providing, within the digital document, a notification of an automatically resolved conflict. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the notification comprises identification of an unselected change. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the manual resolution prompt comprises a side-by-side comparison of the first change and the second change for a user to make a selection to resolve the conflict. 10. A computer system comprising: at least one processor; and a memory, operatively connected with the at least one processor, that comprises instructions stored thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform a method that comprises: detecting a conflict between a first change to a content portion of a digital document and a second change to the content portion of the digital document, determining whether the conflict between the first change and the second change is to be resolved automatically or whether the conflict requires manual user input to be resolved based on an application of conflict resolution logic that comprises applying at least one conflict rule to evaluate how the content portion is affected based on the first change and the second change, automatically resolving the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict relates to a property affecting presentation of the content portion; and providing a manual resolution prompt for a user to manually resolve the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict results in an amount of data loss to the content portion. 11. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the property of the content portion is one or more selected from a group consisting of: a position, an orientation, a formatting and a size. 12. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the conflict resolution logic selects the at least one conflict rule based on a classification of the conflict as a page-level conflict. 13. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein the method, executed by the at least one processor, further comprises providing, within the digital document, a notification of an automatically resolved conflict. 14. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the notification comprises identification of an unselected change. 15. The computer system of claim 10 , wherein when data loss is detected as a result of the conflict, the conflict resolution logic executes a threshold analysis associated with the amount of data loss, and wherein the conflict resolution logic is configured to: automatically resolve the conflict when the amount of data loss is less than or equal to a threshold value based on the threshold analysis, and require manual resolution to resolve the conflict when the amount of data loss exceeds the threshold value based on the threshold analysis. 16. One or more non-transitory computer-readable memory having computer-executable instructions embodied thereon that, when executed by at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to execute a method comprising: detecting a conflict between a first change to a content portion of a digital document and a second change to the content portion of the digital document; determining whether the conflict between the first change and the second change is to be resolved automatically or whether the conflict requires manual user input to be resolved based on an application of conflict resolution logic that comprises applying at least one conflict rule to evaluate how the content portion is affected based on the first change and the second change; automatically resolving the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict relates to a property affecting presentation of the content portion; and providing a manual resolution prompt for a user to manually resolve the conflict based on a determination, by the conflict resolution logic, that the conflict results in an amount of data loss to the content portion. 17. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable memory of claim 16 , wherein the property of the content portion is one or more selected from a group consisting of: a position, an orientation, a formatting and a size. 18. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable memory of claim 16 , wherein the conflict resolution logic selects the at least one conflict rule based on a classification of the conflict as a page-level conflict. 19. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable memory of claim 16 , wherein the method, executed by the at least one processor, further comprises providing, within the digital document, a notification of an automatically resolved conflict. 20. The one or more non-transitory computer-readable memory of claim 16 , wherein when data loss is detected as a result of the conflict, the conflict resolution logic executes a threshold analysis associated with the amount of data loss, and wherein the conflict resolution logic is configured to: automatically resolve the conflict when the amount of data loss is less than or equal to a threshold value based on the threshold analysis, and require manual resolution to resolve the conflict when the amount of data loss exceeds the threshold value based on the threshold analysis.
Calculation of difference between files · CPC title
Formatting, i.e. changing of presentation of documents (automatic justification G06F40/189; automatic line break hyphenation G06F40/191) · CPC title
Selection of displayed objects or displayed text elements (G06F3/0482 takes precedence) · CPC title
Version control (for software G06F8/71) · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.