System and method for validating compaction of a work site
US-9423332-B2 · Aug 23, 2016 · US
US9772625B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9772625-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414275374-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 12, 2014 |
| Priority date | May 12, 2014 |
| Publication date | Sep 26, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 26, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A reference model generates a model output indicative of modeled operations of one or more worksites. The model output is compared against actual operation data indicative of actual worksite operations. A recommendation engine generates recommendations to adjust the worksite operations so that they more closely conform to the model operations.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed: 1. A computer-implemented method, comprising: receiving worksite objectives for concurrently operating a plurality of different worksites; using a computer-implemented model generator to generate a reference model that provides a model output indicative of modeled operation of the plurality of different worksites; and generating control signals to perform closed loop, near real time control of the operation of the plurality of different worksites using the reference model, comprising: receiving operations data through a communication system indicative of an actual worksite performance; comparing the operations data to the reference model and generating an error output using a computer-implemented error calculation component; comparing the error output to a threshold; and generating the control signals based at least in part on the comparison between the error output and the threshold; generating a recommended adjustments output indicative of adjustments to the plurality of different worksites based on the comparison of the error output to the threshold using a computer-implemented decision support system; and generating the control signals based at least in part on the generated recommended adjustments output. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein receiving worksite objectives comprises receiving a desired worksite output indicative of a quantity of material per unit time. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving a disturbance input indicative of a disturbance to the worksite operations; and wherein generating the reference model is based at least in part on the disturbance input.
Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling · CPC title
characterised by the transport system · CPC title
Adjustment or analysis of established resource schedule, e.g. resource or task levelling, or dynamic rescheduling · CPC title
Cross-Sectional Technologies · mapped topic
Enterprise or organisation modelling · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.