Document decomposition based on determined logical visual layering of document content
US-2024403543-A1 · Dec 5, 2024 · US
US9769008B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9769008-B1 |
| Application number | US-96008810-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Dec 3, 2010 |
| Priority date | Dec 3, 2010 |
| Publication date | Sep 19, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 19, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Content is distributed electronically to a plurality of users. As the users consume the content, they may annotate the content to indicate corrections, comments, or other information. Annotations are collected at a server and reported back to content creators, such as authors, publishers, translators, editors, etc.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: under control of one or more processors configured with executable instructions, electronically distributing content items for consumption by human readers, each content item having one or more content creators; receiving, at a server, a plurality of annotations made by the human readers, the annotations being associated respectively with particular parts of individual content items; grouping the annotations based at least in part on similarity of content; reporting the grouped annotations to at least one of the one or more content creators of the particular content item; and filtering the annotations reported to a first one of content creators differently from the annotations reported to a second one of content creators based at least in part on a first role of the first content creator and a second role of the second content creator. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the annotations comprise one or more of the following: editorial revisions; typographical corrections; translations; language translation corrections; facts; factual corrections; thematic suggestions; criticisms; answers to questions posed by at least one of the content creators; supplemental or additional content; or storyline votes. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more content creators comprise at least one of an author, a publisher, an editor, or a translator. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the reporting is performed periodically to produce reports of annotations made during different time periods. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: omitting duplicate annotations in the reporting; and indicating a number of the duplicate annotations omitted. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising grouping the annotations according to portions of the particular content item to which they apply. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the grouping the annotations based at least in part on similarity of content comprises comparing word content of individual ones of the annotations with word content of other ones of the annotations. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising grouping annotations made by different classes of human readers. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising recording the annotations as public or private as designated by the human readers making the annotations. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising recording the annotations as anonymous in accordance with designations by the human readers making the annotations. 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the annotations are viewable as threaded discussions. 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the distributing is to selected classes of reviewers, said classes of reviewers including one or more of the following: previous reviewers; highly-rated or highly-trusted reviewers; paid reviewers; subject-area/genre specialists; professional reviewers; individually-selected reviewers; or randomly-selected reviewers. 13. A system comprising: one or more servers configured with executable instructions to perform actions comprising: receiving annotations made by human readers in electronic books; compiling the annotations made in individual electronic books; reporting the compiled annotations made in a particular electronic book to a first content creator and a second content creator of the particular electronic book; and filtering the compiled annotations reported to the first content creator differently from the compiled annotations reported to the second content creator based at least in part on respective roles of the first content creator and the second content creator. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the annotations comprise one or more of the following: editorial revisions; typographical corrections; translations; language translation corrections; facts; factual corrections; thematic suggestions; criticisms; answers to questions posed by at least one of the one or more content creators; supplemental or additional content; or storyline votes. 15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the respective roles comprise at least one of: an author, a publisher, an editor, or a translator. 16. The system of claim 13 , the actions further comprising grouping the compiled annotations based on similarity by comparing word content of individual ones of the annotations with word content of other ones of the annotations. 17. A system comprising: one or more processors; one or more non-transitory computer-readable media coupled to the one or more processors; and one or more modules maintained on the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media that, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform acts comprising: sending an electronic book to a plurality of electronic devices associated with a plurality of respective human readers, the electronic book having an author; receiving from the plurality of electronic devices, a plurality of annotations made by the respective human readers, the annotations being associated respectively with particular parts of the electronic book; determining one or more duplicate annotations in the plurality of annotations; and sending at least one of the annotations to the author of the electronic book with the one or more duplicate annotations omitted and an indication of a number of the duplicate annotations omitted. 18. The system as recited in claim 17 , the acts further comprising grouping the annotations based on similarity of content, wherein the sending includes sending the grouped annotations. 19. The system as recited in claim 17 , wherein the annotations comprise one or more of the following: editorial revisions; typographical corrections; translations; language translation corrections; facts; factual corrections; thematic suggestions; criticisms; answers to questions posed by at least one of the content creators; supplemental or additional content; or storyline votes. 20. The system as recited in claim 17 , wherein the annotations are each associated with location information indicating a location within the electronic book to which the annotation pertains.
Annotation, e.g. comment data or footnotes · CPC title
Machine-assisted translation, e.g. using translation memory · CPC title
Electricity · mapped topic
in the application layer [OSI layer 7] · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.