Methods and apparatus to validate translated guest code in a dynamic binary translator
US-9223553-B2 · Dec 29, 2015 · US
US9766993B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9766993-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213474887-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 18, 2012 |
| Priority date | May 18, 2012 |
| Publication date | Sep 19, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 19, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Quality of information (QoI) assessment in dynamic sensor networks that includes evaluating, by a computer, a first value reflective of available reports from sensors that are dynamically associated with the computer. A second value reflective of reports expected to have been available for evaluation about the observed phenomena is estimated. A QoI of the available reports is assessed. The assessing is based on the first value reflective of the available reports and the second value reflective of reports expected to have been available for evaluation. A third value, based on the assessing is output.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: a processor configured for: evaluating a first value reflective of a number of available reports from sensors about an event in a monitored location, the sensors located in the monitored location and dynamically associated with a network; estimating a second value reflective of a number of reports expected to have been available for evaluation about the event in the monitored location, the estimating based on an expected density of sensors in a region around the monitored location; assessing a quality of information (QoI) of the available reports, the assessing based on the first value reflective of the number of available reports and the second value reflective of the number of reports expected to have been available for evaluation; determining a status of the monitored location area based on the available reports and the assessing; and outputting the status of the monitored location, the status including a request to take an action at the monitored location based on the status indicating that a threshold level has been crossed, the outputting the status to a second processor that controls a flow of traffic leading to the monitored location in response to the request to take an action by altering at least one of traffic flow signage and a traffic signal. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured for receiving the available reports from the sensors during a time period, wherein the estimating is further based on the time period. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the estimating is further based on an expected number of sensors in the region around the monitored location. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the assessing is further based on contents of the available reports. 5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sensors include fixed and mobile sensors. 6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the status includes the QoI.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.