Automatic speech tagging system and method thereof
US-9244901-B1 · Jan 26, 2016 · US
US9761226B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9761226-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414310557-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 20, 2014 |
| Priority date | Oct 27, 2008 |
| Publication date | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 12, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods, systems, and software are disclosed for providing rule handling functionality in a distributed transcription environment. Some embodiments provide client-server workflow management for providing and supporting distributed transcription services. Other embodiments provide audio-to-text synchronization to support certain transcription functionality. Still other embodiments provide logging functionality to support quality, personnel, billing, and/or other enterprise tasks. And other embodiments provide functionality to support rule generation, editing, validation, and/or execution.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for rules handling in a distributed transcription system, the method comprising: receiving a transcription assignment at a computer-implemented transcription environment, the transcription assignment comprising: dictation data comprising audio information dictated by an author into a dictation interface, the author being associated with a context designation; and a transcription rule set being one of a plurality of transcription rule sets stored in a rules data store and generated for application to the dictation data as a function of the context designation, the context designation including at least one context tag indicating a context for the transcription assignment, wherein the at least one context tag is associated with at least one of a plurality of transcription rules, and wherein the context designation is associated with a prompt provided to the author substantially when the author dictated the dictation data, and wherein the transcription rule set includes at least one of a warning rule or an error rule, the warning rule including a trigger based on a condition indicating a possible error, the error rule including a trigger based on a condition indicating a definite error; receiving transcription data at the computer-implemented transcription environment from a transcriptionist via a transcription interface, the transcription data comprising textual representations of corresponding portions of the dictation data, the textual representations being at least partially synchronized with the corresponding portions of the dictation data; identifying a rule violation by applying the transcription rule set to the transcription data after receiving the transcription data using the computer-implemented transcription environment, the rule violation being associated with a textual representation and substantially synchronized with the corresponding portion of the dictation data, the application of the transcription rule set triggering at least one of the warning rule or the error rule; and displaying an indication of the rule violation to the transcriptionist via the computer-implemented transcription environment. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving an interaction with the computer-implemented transcription environment from the transcriptionist indicating a selection of the rule violation; in response to receiving the interaction, configuring playback of the audio information from a position associated with the corresponding portion of the dictation data substantially synchronized with the rule violation. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the transcription assignment is received at the computer-implemented transcription environment from a workflow management server over a communications network, the workflow management server being communicatively coupled with the rules data store and configured to: receive the dictation data from the author, the author being one of a plurality of authors in communication with the workflow management server over the communications network; identify the transcription rule set from the rules data store for application to the dictation data; generate the transcription assignment, such that the transcription assignment comprises the dictation data and the transcription rule set and is formatted for use in the computer-implemented transcription environment; assign the transcription assignment to the transcriptionist, the transcriptionist being one of a plurality of transcriptionists in communication with the workflow management server over the communications network; and communicate the transcription assignment over the communications network to the transcriptionist for use in the computer-implemented transcription environment. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the context designation comprises a plurality of context tags that indicate the context for the transcription assignment, each of the plurality of context tags being associated with the plurality of transcription rules, and wherein the transcription rule set is derived from the plurality of transcription rules. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein each context tag indicates at least one of an organization identifier, a site identifier, a location identifier, a work type identifier, an author identifier, an author type identifier, an author role identifier, a work role identifier, a dictation interface identifier, or a transcriptionist identifier. 6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: determining the context designation by identifying the context tags associated with the dictation data, wherein at least some of the context tags are identified by analyzing the dictation data. 7. The method of claim 4 , further comprising: determining the context designation by identifying the context tags associated with the dictation data, wherein at least some of the context tags are associated with prompts provided to the author substantially when the dictation data is dictated by the author. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein receiving transcription data at the computer-implemented transcription environment from the transcriptionist comprises: playing the audio information comprised by the dictation data from the computer-implemented transcription environment to the transcriptionist; receiving the transcription data during playback of the audio information, such that at least some of the textual representations are received via the transcription interface substantially as the respective corresponding portions of the dictation data are being played to the transcriptionist. 9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: providing a transcription template to the transcriptionist configured to receive the transcription data from the transcriptionist via the transcription interface, the transcription template being generated at least according to the set of transcription rules. 10. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the rule violation by applying the transcription rule set to the transcription data using the computer-implemented transcription environment comprises: applying the transcription rule set to the transcription data substantially while receiving the transcription data from the transcriptionist via the transcription interface, such that identifying the rule violation occurs substantially in real time while receiving the transcription data. 11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving an instruction to validate the transcription data, wherein identifying the rule violation occurs substantially in response to receiving the instruction. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the set of transcription rules comprises: an information rule configured to trigger a rule violation as a function of an association between the dictation data and a context tag associated with the information rule, regardless of the transcription data received from the transcriptionist, a triggering of the information rule indicating information relating to a handling instruction associated with the dictation data; a warning rule configured to trigger a rule violation as a function of applying the warning rule to the transcription data received from the transcriptionist, a triggering of the warning rule indicating a possible error in the transcription data; and an error rule configured to trigger a rule violation as a function of applying the error rule to the transcription data received from the transcriptionist, a triggering of the error rule indicating a definite error in the transcription data. 13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: receiving a submission instruction from the transcriptionist at the com
Orthographic correction, e.g. spell checking or vowelisation · CPC title
Grammatical analysis; Style critique · CPC title
Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue · CPC title
Speech to text systems (G10L15/08 takes precedence) · CPC title
Validation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.