Method for predicting the fertility potential of a female subject
US-2024094221-A1 · Mar 21, 2024 · US
US9759728B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9759728-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414913856-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 4, 2014 |
| Priority date | Sep 5, 2013 |
| Publication date | Sep 12, 2017 |
| Grant date | Sep 12, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The present invention relates generally to the fields of reproductive medicine. More specifically, the present invention relates to methods and kits for determining the human sperm quality.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method for assessing sperm fertility rate in an infertile or hypofertile subject or a subject with difficulty to conceive for more than one year, comprising the steps of: i) liquefying a semen sample obtained from said subject at 37° C. for 30 minutes, ii) isolating spermatozoa from said semen sample through a single-step density gradient centrifugation, iii) washing said isolated spermatozoa with tris-buffered saline, iv) homogenizing said isolated spermatozoa with a lysis buffer to obtain a spermatozoa protein lysate, v) measuring the expression level of one or both of a kinase anchoring protein 4 (AKAP4) and Hexokinase 1 in said protein lysate, and vi) comparing said measured expression level with a reference value, wherein detecting a differential in the expression of the one or both of AKAP4 and Hexokinase 1 between the sample and the reference value is indicative of sperm fertility rate. 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said subject is classified as a normozoospermic subject. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein said tris-buffered saline comprises 0.1 mM of HCl, 100 mM of NaCl, and has a pH equal to 7.6. 4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein step v) is performed by analyzing said spermatozoa protein lysate obtained in step iv) in a 1D SDS-PAGE with blue staining, providing a numerical analysis of said blue stained gel, selecting protein bands between Low molecular weights 15 to 30 kDA and protein bands between High molecular weights 80 and 110 kDa, representing each band by a densitometric curve and calculating the area under the densitometric curve, and calculating a ratio between the area under the densitometric curve from Low molecular weight and High molecular weight band intensities. 5. The method according to claim 4 wherein a ratio between 1 to 2 is indicative of good sperm quality, and a ratio above 2 is indicative of bad sperm quality. 6. The method according to claim 3 , wherein step v) is performed by analyzing said spermatozoa protein lysate obtained in step iv) in a 1D SDS-PAGE with blue staining, providing a numerical analysis of said blue stained gel, selecting protein bands between Low molecular weights 15 to 30 kDA and protein bands between High molecular weights 80 and 110 kDa, representing each band by a densitometric curve and calculating the area under the densitometric curve, and calculating a ratio between the area under the densitometric curve from Low molecular weight and High molecular weight band intensities. 7. A method enabling an infertile or hypofertile subject or a subject with difficulty to conceive for more than one year to determine the most successful assisted-reproductive technology comprising the steps of: i) liquefying a semen sample obtained from said subject at 37° C. for 30 minutes, ii) isolating spermatozoa from said semen sample through a single-step density gradient centrifugation, iii) washing said isolated spermatozoa with tris-buffered saline, iv) homogenizing said isolated spermatozoa with a lysis buffer to obtain a spermatozoa protein lysate, v) measuring the expression level of one or both of AKAP4 and Hexokinase 1 in said protein lysate, and vi) comparing said measured expression level with a reference value, wherein detecting a differential in the expression of the one or both of AKAP4 and Hexokinase 1 between the sample and the reference value is indicative of a given assisted reproductive technology. 8. The method according to claim 7 , wherein step v) is performed by analyzing said spermatozoa protein lysate obtained in step iv) in a 1D SDS-PAGE with blue staining, providing a numerical analysis of said blue stained gel, selecting protein bands between Low molecular weights 15 to 30 kDA and protein bands between High molecular weights 80 and 110 kDa, representing each band by a densitometric curve and calculating the area under the densitometric curve, and calculating a ratio between the area under the densitometric curve from Low molecular weight and High molecular weight band intensities, wherein when said ratio is above 2 choosing intrauterine insemination (IUI) as an assisted-reproductive technology. 9. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said tris-buffered saline comprises 0.1 mM of HCl, 100 mM of NaCl and has a pH equal to 7.6. 10. The method according to claim 7 , wherein said subject is classified as a normozoospermic subject.
related to pregnancy or the gonads · CPC title
with a definite EC number (2.7.1.-) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.