Fall detection system and a method of operating a fall detection system

US9754470B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9754470-B2
Application numberUS-200913124404-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateOct 9, 2009
Priority dateOct 17, 2008
Publication dateSep 5, 2017
Grant dateSep 5, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

An alarm ( 35 ) provided by a fall detection system ( 2 ) may be caused by an accidental drop of the system. Therefore prior to issuing the alarm the fall detection system a confirmation is needed that a potential fall originates from a fall detection system that is worn by a user ( 4 ). A fall of a fall detection system that is not attached to a user is characterized by the occurrence of one or more full rotations of the system. Said rotations are identified by analyzing the output signal of a magnetometer, and by detecting a periodicity in said output signal. The fall detection system ( 2 ) provides the alarm in dependence of an identified absence of at least one full rotation.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

The invention claimed is: 1. A fall detection system comprising: one or more detectors that monitor movements of a user of the fall detection system, the one or more detectors including a magnetometer, an analysis element that is coupled to the one or more detectors and analyzes: at least one output of at least of the one or more detectors to detect a potential fall of the user; and an output signal of the magnetometer to detect at least one full rotation of at least 360 degrees of the magnetometer, wherein, upon detecting the potential fall of the user, the analysis element causes an alarm element to: issue an alarm when the at least one full rotation is not detected; and not issue the alarm when the at least one full rotation is detected. 2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis element analyzes the output signal of the magnetometer to detect the at least one full rotation in response to detecting the potential fall of the user. 3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more detectors include accelerometer coupled to the analysis element that provides an acceleration signal indicative of an acceleration of the system, wherein the analysis element analyzes the acceleration signal to detect the potential fall in response to the acceleration signal having exceeded a predetermined threshold value. 4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis element determines a periodicity of the output signal. 5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the analysis element determines the periodicity using an autocorrelation function performed on the output signal of the magnetometer. 6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the analysis element includes: an analog to digital converter coupled to the magnetometer that converts the output signal to a plurality of digital codes, a memory coupled to the analog to digital converter that stores the plurality of digital codes, a processor coupled to the memory and arranged for retrieving the digital codes from the memory and further arranged for determining a periodicity of the output signal in dependence of the plurality of digital codes. 7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis element determines the periodicity using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) performed on the output signal of the magnetometer. 8. A method comprising: analyzing, by a processing system, one or more sensor signals to identify a potential fall by a user of a fall detection system, analyzing, by the processing system, an output signal provided by a magnetometer of the fall detection system to detect the absence or presence of at least one full rotation of at least 360 degrees of the magnetometer, and in response to an identification of the potential fall: providing, by the processing system, an alarm in the absence of the at least one full rotation; and preventing, by the processing system, the alarm in the presence of the at least one full rotation. 9. A method according to claim 8 , wherein analyzing the output signal of the magnetometer is performed in response to the identification of the potential fall. 10. A method according to claim 8 , wherein analyzing the output signal of the magnetometer includes determining a periodicity of the output signal. 11. A method according to claim 10 , wherein the periodicity of the output signal is determined using autocorrelation performed on the output signal of the magnetometer. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the periodicity of the output signal is determined using a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) performed on the output signal of the magnetometer. 13. A method according to claim 8 , wherein analyzing the one or more sensor signals includes analyzing an acceleration signal provided by an accelerometer comprised in the fall detection system. 14. A non-transitory computer-readable medium that includes a program that, when executed on a processor, causes the processor to: detect a potential fall by a user of a fall detection system, analyze an output signal provided by a magnetometer of the fall detection system to detect the absence or presence of at least one full rotation of at least 360 degrees of the magnetometer, and, in the event that the potential fall is defected and the at least one full rotation is not detected, the program causes the processor to issue an alarm, and in the event that the at least one full rotation is detected, the program prevents the processor from issuing the alarm. 15. The medium of claim 14 , wherein the program causes the processor to detect the absence or presence of the at least one full rotation of the magnetometer by a process that includes applying an autocorrelation function to the output signal. 16. The medium of claim 14 , wherein the program causes the processor to detect the absence or presence of the at least one full rotation of the magnetometer by a process that includes determining a periodicity of the output signal. 17. The medium of claim 14 , wherein the program causes the processor to detect the potential fall by a process that includes analyzing an acceleration signal provided by an accelerometer. 18. The medium of claim 17 , wherein the program causes the processor to analyze the output signal provided by the magnetometer only after the potential fall is detected by analyzing the acceleration signal. 19. The medium of claim 14 , wherein the program causes the processor to detect the absence or presence of the at least one full rotation of the magnetometer by a process that includes applying a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to the output signal.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • worn on the body to detect changes of posture, e.g. a fall, inclination, acceleration, gait · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9754470B2 cover?
An alarm ( 35 ) provided by a fall detection system ( 2 ) may be caused by an accidental drop of the system. Therefore prior to issuing the alarm the fall detection system a confirmation is needed that a potential fall originates from a fall detection system that is worn by a user ( 4 ). A fall of a fall detection system that is not attached to a user is characterized by the occurrence of one o…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Ten Kate Warner Rudolph Theophile, Koninklijke Philips Nv
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G08B21/0446. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Sep 05 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).