Automated metrology and model correction for three dimensional (3d) printability
US-2015269282-A1 · Sep 24, 2015 · US
US9747394B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9747394-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414217891-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 18, 2014 |
| Priority date | Mar 18, 2014 |
| Publication date | Aug 29, 2017 |
| Grant date | Aug 29, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A system and a method assess the three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model. Slices of the 3D model are received or generated. The slices represent two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers. Further, printing of the slices is simulated to identify corresponding printable slices.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers, wherein one of the slices is generated by intersecting a 2D plane with its normal parallel to a build orientation of the 3D model at a height of the corresponding print layer; sample a rotation space of the 3D model to generate a set of build orientations of the 3D model; optimize an objective function related to build orientation to identify a best build orientation of the set; adaptively sample the best build orientation in a rotation space until convergence of the objective function to identify an optimal build orientation; and simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices. 2. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the objective function identifies an amount of support material on surfaces of the 3D model that are neither functional nor aesthetic. 3. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor includes a plurality of processors, and wherein the plurality of processors are configured to simultaneously simulate printing of a plurality of the slices in parallel to identify corresponding printable slices. 4. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; and simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices, wherein the simulation simulates printing of each of the slices to identify a corresponding printable slice by translating a feature model representing a smallest printable feature within a boundary of the slice or along a user-defined tool path. 5. The system according to claim 4 , wherein the translating is performed on a boundary representation of the slice. 6. The system according to claim 4 , wherein the translating is performed on an image representation of the slice. 7. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; and simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices, wherein the simulation simulates printing of each of the slices to identify a corresponding printable slice by calculating a morphological opening of the slice by a structuring element representing a smallest printable feature. 8. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the at least one processor includes a plurality of processors, and wherein the plurality of processors are configured to simultaneously simulate printing of a plurality of the slices in parallel to identify corresponding printable slices. 9. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; and simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: simulate printing of each of the slices to identify a corresponding printability map, the printability map partitioning the slice into three disjoint sets of regions, the three disjoint sets including a set of regions formed of features smaller than a minimum printable feature, a set of regions formed of features larger than the minimum printable feature, but smaller than a minimum recommended feature for a print material, and a set of regions formed of features larger than the minimum printable feature and the minimum recommended feature. 10. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; and simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: simulate printing of each of the slices to identify a set of regions of the slice formed of features larger, smaller, or of equal size than a user-defined feature. 11. A system for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said system comprising: at least one processor configured to: receive or generate slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; simulate printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices; identify deviations between the slices and the corresponding printable slices; and display the deviations to a user on a display device. 12. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one processor includes a plurality of processors, and wherein the plurality of processors are configured to simultaneously simulate printing of a plurality of the slices in parallel to identify corresponding printable slices. 13. The system according to claim 11 , wherein the at least one processor includes a plurality of processors, and wherein the plurality of processors are configured to simultaneously simulate printing of a plurality of the slices in parallel to identify corresponding printable slices. 14. A method for assessing three dimensional (3D) printability of a 3D model, said method comprising: receiving or generating by at least one processor slices of the 3D model, the slices representing two dimensional (2D) solids of the 3D model to be printed in corresponding print layers; simulating by the at least one processor printing of the slices to identify corresponding printable slices; identifying deviations between the slices and the corresponding printable slices; and displaying the deviations to a user on a display device. 15. The method according to claim 14 , further including: generating one of the slices by intersecting a 2D plane with its normal parallel to a build orientation of the 3D model at a height of the corresponding print layer. 16. The method according to claim 14 , further including: sampling a rotation space of the 3D model to generate a set of build orientations of the 3D model; optimizing an objective function related to build orientation to identify a best build orientation of the set; and adaptively sampling the best build orientation in a rotation space until convergence of the objective function to identify an optimal build orientation. 17. The method according to claim 14 , wherein the simulating simulates printing of each of the slices to identify a corresponding printable slice by translating a feature model representing a smallest printable feature within a boundary of the slice or along a user-defined tool path. 18. The method according to claim 17 , wherein the translating is performed on a boundary representation of the slice. 19. The method according to claim 17 , wherein the translating is performed on an image representation of the slice.
Constructive solid geometry [CSG] using solid primitives, e.g. cylinders, cubes · CPC title
Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing · CPC title
Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing · CPC title
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.