Measurement of field reliability metrics
US-9288130-B2 · Mar 15, 2016 · US
US9743295B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9743295-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514862066-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 22, 2015 |
| Priority date | Sep 22, 2015 |
| Publication date | Aug 22, 2017 |
| Grant date | Aug 22, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Techniques described herein may be used to remotely troubleshoot radio access networks (RANs). A server may communicate with a base station of a RAN via a site router of the RAN. At some point, the server may detect a RAN failure event that prevents the server from communicating with a base station. The server may identify a working RAN near the failed RAN and a user device within the coverage area of the working RAN that can establish a device-to-device (D2D) connection with the base station of the failed RAN. As such, the server may establish an alternative connection to the base station of the failed RAN via the base station of the working RAN and the D2D connection. The server may use the alternative connection to determine reason for the RAN failure and to implement procedures for restoring the failed RAN to working order.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method performed by a server device, comprising: communicating, by the server device, with a first base station of a first radio access network (RAN) via a site router of the first RAN; detecting, by the server device, an inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router; identifying, by the server device, a second base station of a second (RAN) for establishing an alternative connection to the first base station; identifying, by the server device, a user device, capable of communicating with the first base station; and establishing, by the server device, the alternative connection to the first base station via the second base station and the user device. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining, by communicating with the first base station via the alternative connection, a cause of the inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router; and determining a solution to the inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the alternative connection includes a device-to-device (D2D) connection between the user device and a D2D transceiver of the first base station. 4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the establishing of the alternative connection includes: providing configuration information, to the user device, for establishing the D2D connection with the first base station and for operating as a data relay in the alternative connection; and providing, to the user device, instructions to establish the D2D connection and to operate as the data relay in accordance with the configuration information. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the communicating with the first base station includes: providing, in response to the notification, instructions for responding to the inability to communicate with the server device via the site router, the instructions including to: activate a proxy server installed on the first base station, establish the D2D connection with a user device, and communicate with the server device via the D2D connection. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: providing the first base station with instruction to perform a diagnostic test regarding an operational status of the first base station; receiving, from the first base station, a result from the diagnostic test; and determining, based on the result, whether the first base station was a cause of the inability of the server device to communicate with the first base station. 7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: communicating with the site router via the alternative connection with the first base station; and causing the site router to perform a diagnostic test regarding an operational status of the site router; and receiving, from the site router, a result from the diagnostic test; and determining, based on the result, whether the site router was a cause of the inability of the server device to communicate with the first base station. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the server device includes an operations, administration, and management (OAM) server of a wireless telecommunications network corresponding to the first RAN and the second RAN. 9. The method of claim 3 , wherein the D2D connection between the user device and the first base station includes multiple D2D connections linking a series of user devices between the user device and the first base station. 10. A server device, comprising: a non-transitory memory device storing a plurality of processor-executable instructions; and a processor configured to execute the processor-executable instructions, wherein executing the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: communicate with a first base station of a first radio access network (RAN) via a site router of the first RAN; detect an inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router; identify a second base station of a second (RAN) for establishing an alternative connection to the first base station; identify a user device within the coverage area of the second base station; and establish the alternative connection to the first base station via the second base station and the user device. 11. The server device of claim 10 , wherein executing the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: determine, by communicating with the first base station via the alternative connection, a cause of the inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router; and determine a solution to the inability to communicate with the first base station via the site router. 12. The server device of claim 10 , wherein the alternative connection includes a device-to-device (D2D) connection between the user device and a D2D transceiver of the first base station. 13. The server device of claim 12 , wherein, to establish the alternative connection, the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: provide configuration information, to the user device, for establishing the D2D connection with the first base station and for operating as a data relay in the alternative connection; and provide, to the user device, instructions to establish the D2D connection and to operate as the data relay in accordance with the configuration information. 14. The server device of claim 12 , wherein, to communicate with the first base station, the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: receive a notification, from the first base station, that the first base station is capable of establishing a D2D connection with user devices; and provide, in response to the notification, configuration information that enables the first base station to communicate with the server device via the D2D connection. 15. The server device of claim 14 , wherein, to communicate with the first base station, the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: provide, in response to the notification, instructions for responding to the inability to communicate with the server device via the site router, the instructions including: instructions to activate a proxy server installed on the first base station, instructions to establish the D2D connection with the user device, and instructions to communicate with the server device via the D2D connection. 16. The server device of claim 10 , wherein executing the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: provide the first base station with instruction to perform a diagnostic test regarding an operational status of the first base station; receive, from the first base station, a result from the diagnostic test; and determine, based on the result, whether the first base station was a cause of the inability of the server device to communicate with the first base station. 17. The server device of claim 10 , wherein executing the processor-executable instructions causes the processor to: communicate with the site router via the alternative connection with the first base station; and cause the site router to perform a diagnostic test regarding an operational status of the site router; and receive, from the site router, a result from the diagnostic test; and determine, based on the result, whether the site router was a cause of the inability of the server device to communicate with the first base station. 18. A server device, comprising: a non-transitory memory device storing a plurality of processor-executable instructions; and a processor configured to execute the
by dynamic selection of recovery network elements, e.g. replacement by the most appropriate element after failure · CPC title
by additionally acting on or stimulating the network after receiving notifications · CPC title
Direct-mode setup · CPC title
Testing arrangements · CPC title
Modification of an existing route · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.