Application focus in speech-based systems
US-2016180853-A1 · Jun 23, 2016 · US
US9740751B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9740751-B1 |
| Application number | US-201615046831-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Feb 18, 2016 |
| Priority date | Feb 18, 2016 |
| Publication date | Aug 22, 2017 |
| Grant date | Aug 22, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for receiving audio data corresponding to an utterance of a user, determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an action keyword, obtaining candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, which include applications associated with a uniform resource identifier (URI) that corresponds to the action keyword, ranking the candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power score associated with each of the candidate applications, identifying a highest ranked application among the candidate applications that has a URI that corresponds to at least the action keyword, and executing the URI for the highest ranked application among the candidate applications that correspond to at least the action keyword.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving audio data corresponding to an utterance of a user; determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an action keyword, the action keyword corresponding to an action to be performed by a device associated with the user; identifying candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, the candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword comprising applications associated with a uniform resource identifier (URI) that corresponds to the action keyword; selecting a candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power score associated with each of the candidate applications that is determined based at least on a popularity metric and a rating associated with each of the candidate applications, wherein the bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications is normalized for each of the candidate applications to generate a normalized bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications; and executing the URI for the selected candidate application. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an object keyword, the object keyword corresponding to an object of the action to be performed by the device associated with the user; and identifying candidate applications that correspond to a combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, the candidate applications that correspond to the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword comprising applications associated with a URI that corresponds to the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, wherein selecting a candidate application comprises selecting the candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to a combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power score associated with each of the candidate applications, and wherein executing the URI for the selected candidate application comprises executing the URI for the selected candidate application among the identified candidate applications that correspond to the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining at least one application, among the candidate applications, that is not installed on the device associated with the user; and removing the at least one application that is determined to not be installed on the device associated with the user from the identified candidate applications. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications is obtained from metadata associated with the application. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the popularity metric is based on at least one of: a number of downloads, a frequency of use, a user rating, a number of user reviews, a number of search queries, and a number of downloads in a given time period. 6. A computer-implemented method comprising: receiving audio data corresponding to an utterance of a user; determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an action keyword, the action keyword corresponding to an action to be performed by a device associated with the user; identifying candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, the candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword comprising applications associated with a uniform resource identifier (URI) that corresponds to the action keyword; selecting a candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power score associated with each of the candidate applications that is determined based at least on a popularity metric and a rating associated with each of the candidate applications, wherein selecting the candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, comprises: determining a ranking score for each of the candidate applications, the ranking score being determined based at least on the bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications, the power score associated with each of the candidate applications, and a feedback score for each URI that corresponds to the action keyword, the feedback score being determined for each URI based at least on a user action associated with the URI; identifying a highest ranked application among the candidate applications that has a URI that corresponds to at least the action keyword; and executing the URI for the highest ranked application. 7. A system comprising one or more processors and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, when executed by the one or more processors, to cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising: receiving audio data corresponding to an utterance of a user; determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an action keyword, the action keyword corresponding to an action to be performed by a device associated with the user; identifying candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, the candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword comprising applications associated with a uniform resource identifier (URI) that corresponds to the action keyword; selecting a candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to the action keyword, based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power score associated with each of the candidate applications that is determined based at least on a popularity metric and a rating associated with each of the candidate applications, wherein the bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications is normalized for each of the candidate applications to generate a normalized bidding weight associated with the action keyword for each of the candidate applications; and executing the URI for the selected candidate application. 8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the operations comprise: determining that at least a portion of the audio data corresponds to an object keyword, the object keyword corresponding to an object of the action to be performed by the device associated with the user; and identifying candidate applications that correspond to a combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, the candidate applications that correspond to the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword comprising applications associated with a URI that corresponds to the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, wherein selecting a candidate application comprises selecting the candidate application, from the identified candidate applications that correspond to a combination of the action keyword and the object keyword, based at least on: (i) a bidding weight associated with the combination of the action keyword and the object keyword for each of the candidate applications, and (ii) a power scor
Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue · CPC title
Parsing for meaning understanding · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Execution procedure of a spoken command · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.