Method for determining to which extent a lens design is adapted to a user
US-11982879-B2 · May 14, 2024 · US
US9733489B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9733489-B2 |
| Application number | US-201314401747-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 30, 2013 |
| Priority date | May 30, 2012 |
| Publication date | Aug 15, 2017 |
| Grant date | Aug 15, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for providing a personalized optical system for a wearer wherein the optical system characterizes a spectacle ophthalmic lens comprising the following steps: a) providing a visual performance level (VPL) value of at least one eye of the wearer; b) providing a set of rules linking at least the visual performance level of step a) with at least one optical criterion chosen among one or both of the two following optical criteria groups consisting of central vision optical criterion (CVOC) group and peripheral vision optical criterion (PVOC) group; c) calculating the physical and geometrical parameters of the personalized optical system or selecting the personalized optical system in an optical systems data base comprising a plurality of optical systems, so that to meet the set of rules of step b) according to the visual performance level data provided in step a).
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method at least partly implemented by computer means for providing a personalized optical system for a wearer wherein the optical system characterizes an ophthalmic lens for said wearer according to his prescription data, the method comprising the steps of: a) providing a visual performance level (VPL) value of at least one eye of the wearer, with the provision that prescription data (Rx) consisting of sphere, cylinder, axis, addition, prism are not defined as a visual performance level; b) providing a set of rules linking at least the visual performance level of step a) with at least one optical criterion chosen from at least one of the two following optical criteria groups: central vision optical criterion (CVOC) group consisting of prismatic deviation in central vision, ocular deviation, object visual field in central vision, image visual field in central vision, and magnification in central vision; peripheral vision optical criterion (PVOC) group consisting of pupil field ray deviation, object visual field in peripheral vision, image visual field in peripheral vision, prismatic deviation in peripheral vision, and magnification in peripheral vision; and c) calculating by computer means the physical and geometrical parameters of the personalized optical system that meets the prescription data of the wearer or selecting the personalized optical system in an optical systems data base comprising a plurality of optical systems that meet the prescription data of the wearer, so that to meet the set of rules of step b), wherein the rules of the set of rules refer to a link between at least a visual performance level and at least one optical criterion, and to a relationship between the said visual performance level and the said optical criterion. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein rules of the set of rules of step b) are chosen within the list consisting of: providing a desired target value for at least a chosen optical criterion as a function of the value of the visual performance level value of step a); providing an equality or an inequality equation or a relationship between target values of the same optical criteria evaluated over at least two evaluation zones as a function of the value of the visual performance level value of step a); and providing a trend relationship between at least two chosen optical criteria as a function of the value of the visual performance level value of step a). 3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the visual performance level (VPL) of step a) is selected in the list of visual performances levels consisting of a sub-list of visual acuity performances, a sub-list of contrast sensitivity performances, a sub-list of visual space perception performance, a sub-list of reading performance, a sub-list of colour perception performance, a sub-list of self-reported visual performance, or a combination of at least two of said performances. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein the sub-list of visual acuity performances consists of central visual acuity, peripheral visual acuity, dynamic visual acuity, each of said visual acuity being measured either according to monocular or to binocular vision and to either photopic or mesopic or scotopic vision conditions, or a combination of at least two of said visual acuity performances; and/or wherein the sub-list of contrast sensitivity performances consists of spatial contrast sensitivity, time contrast sensitivity, or a combination of said contrast sensitivity performances measured either according to monocular or to binocular vision and to either photopic or mesopic or scotopic vision conditions; and/or wherein the sub-list of “visual space perception” performances consists of distance perception acuteness, stereo acuity, aniseikonia measurement, moving object speed perception, visual field, being measured either photopic or mesopic or scotopic vision conditions, or a combination of at least two of said space perception performances; and/or wherein the sub-list of “reading performances” consists of reading rate performance, reading comprehension performance, word identification performance, being measured either according to monocular or to binocular vision and to either photopic or mesopic or scotopic vision conditions, or a combination of at least two of said reading performances; and/or wherein the sub-list of “color perception performances” consists of hue discrimination, saturation discrimination, brightness discrimination measured either according to monocular or to binocular vision and to either photopic or mesopic or scotopic vision conditions, or a combination of at least two of said color perception performances; and/or wherein the sub-list of “self-reported visual performances” consists of visual related quality of life questionnaires as national eye institute (NEI) visual functioning questionnaire or developed questionnaire on subjective visual performance during defined activities and/or defined conditions or a unique question about self-reported visual performances. 5. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the visual performance levels are selected and wherein a global visual performance scale is defined. 6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the optical system is selected in optical systems data base and wherein all the optical systems of the optical systems data base have been calculating previously taking into account at least a same focalisation criterion over an evaluation zone according to at least a gaze direction. 7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the physical and geometrical parameters of step c) are calculated by computer means with an optimization method wherein at least a focalisation criterion (a) over an evaluation zone according to at least a gaze direction is taken into account to implement the calculation. 8. The method according to claim 6 , wherein the focalisation criterion is selected in the list consisting of optical power, astigmatism, high order aberration (HOA), strehl ratio, root means square (RMS), drop in acuity or contrast. 9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the personalized optical system characterizing a progressive addition spectacle lens wherein the front and the back surfaces may be progressive or regressive addition surfaces and wherein the geometrical factor Q=ADDF/ADD is a parameter used to meet the set of rules according to step c), ADDF being the addition of the front surface and ADD being the optical addition of the lens. 10. The method according to claim 1 wherein the personalized optical system characterises a progressive addition spectacle lens and wherein the “base curve” of the spectacle ophthalmic lens is a parameter used to meet the set of rules according to step c). 11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the personalized optical system characterises a progressive addition spectacle lens and wherein refractive index is a physical parameter used to meet the set of rules of step b) according to step c). 12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the visual performance level of step a) is chosen in the sub-list of visual acuity performance, wherein an optical criterion of step b) is chosen within the visual field list consisting of object visual field in central vision, image visual field in central vision, object visual field in peripheral vision, image visual field in peripheral vision and another optical criterion of step b) is chosen within the magnification list consisting of magnification in central vision, magnification in peripheral vision, and wherein the rule linking the preceding visual performance level and the two preceding optical criteria is a trend rel
Special properties achieved by the combination of the front and back surfaces · CPC title
bifocal; multifocal {; progressive (G02C7/041 takes precedence)} · CPC title
Special mathematical design techniques · CPC title
considering wearer's parameters · CPC title
Lenses; Lens systems {; Methods of designing lenses} · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.