Establishing a point-in-time copy relationship between source logical addresses and target logical addresses
US-2015370722-A1 · Dec 24, 2015 · US
US9720786B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9720786-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414258578-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 22, 2014 |
| Priority date | Apr 22, 2014 |
| Publication date | Aug 1, 2017 |
| Grant date | Aug 1, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
When the mirrored point in time copy fails, at that point in time all the data for making the source and target of the point in time copy consistent is available on secondary volumes at disaster recovery site. The data for the source and target of the failed point in time copy are logically and physically equal at that point in time. This logical relationship can be maintained, and protected against ongoing physical updates to the affected tracks on the source secondary volume, by first reading the affected tracks from the source secondary volume, copying the data to the target secondary volume, and then writing the updated track to the source secondary volume.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for resolving failed mirrored point in time copies, comprising: performing a mirrored point in time copy operation within an asynchronous remote mirror environment; determining when the mirrored point in time copy fails; identifying a point in time when the mirrored point in time copy fails, at that point in time all the data for making the source and target of the point in time copy consistent is available on secondary volumes at a disaster recovery site; maintaining and protecting a logical relationship between the source and the target of the failed point in time copy to prevent ongoing physical updates to any affected tracks on the source secondary volume as data for the source and target of the failed point in time copy are logically and physically equal at that point in time; and establishing a control data structure to track a logical correspondence between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume when a mirrored point in time copy between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume fails; and wherein the performing and determining are performed by an asynchronous mirroring system; and, the identifying, maintaining and protecting and establishing are performed by a failure resolution system. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: reading the affected tracks from the source secondary volume; copying the data to the target secondary volume; and writing the updated track to the source secondary volume. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the control data structure comprises a bitmap associated with each of the target secondary volume and the source secondary volume. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the control data structures are hardened to a state data set which functions as a persistent store for the control information. 5. A system comprising: a processor; a data bus coupled to the processor; and a computer-usable medium embodying computer program code, the computer-usable medium being coupled to the data bus, the computer program code used for resolving failed mirrored point in time copies and comprising instructions executable by the processor and configured for: performing a mirrored point in time copy operation within an asynchronous remote mirror environment; determining when the mirrored point in time copy fails; identifying a point in time when the mirrored point in time copy fails, at that point in time all the data for making the source and target of the point in time copy consistent is available on secondary volumes at a disaster recovery site; maintaining and protecting a logical relationship between the source and the target of the failed point in time copy to prevent ongoing physical updates to any affected tracks on the source secondary volume as data for the source and target of the failed point in time copy are logically and physically equal at that point in time; and, establishing a control data structure to track a logical correspondence between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume when a mirrored point in time copy between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume fails; and wherein the performing and determining are performed by an asynchronous mirroring system; and, the identifying, maintaining and protecting and establishing are performed by a failure resolution system. 6. The system of claim 5 , wherein the instructions are further configured for: reading the affected tracks from the source secondary volume; copying the data to the target secondary volume; and writing the updated track to the source secondary volume. 7. The system of claim 5 , wherein: the control data structure comprises a bitmap associated with each of the target secondary volume and the source secondary volume. 8. The system of claim 7 , wherein: the control data structures are hardened to a state data set which functions as a persistent store for the control information. 9. A computer-readable storage medium embodying computer program code, the computer program code comprising computer executable instructions configured for: performing a mirrored point in time copy operation within an asynchronous remote mirror environment; determining when the mirrored point in time copy fails; identifying a point in time when the mirrored point in time copy fails, at that point in time all the data for making the source and target of the point in time copy consistent is available on secondary volumes at a disaster recovery site; maintaining and protecting a logical relationship between the source and the target of the failed point in time copy to prevent ongoing physical updates to any affected tracks on the source secondary volume as data for the source and target of the failed point in time copy are logically and physically equal at that point in time; and establishing a control data structure to track a logical correspondence between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume when a mirrored point in time copy between the source secondary volume and the target secondary volume fails; and wherein the performing and determining are performed by an asynchronous mirroring system; and, the identifying, maintaining and protecting and establishing are performed by a failure resolution system. 10. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , further comprising computer executable instructions for: reading the affected tracks from the source secondary volume; copying the data to the target secondary volume; and writing the updated track to the source secondary volume. 11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein: the control data structure comprises a bitmap associated with each of the target secondary volume and the source secondary volume. 12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 9 , wherein: the control data structures are hardened to a state data set which functions as a persistent store for the control information.
to make the backup process non-disruptive · CPC title
Using snapshots, i.e. a logical point-in-time copy of the data · CPC title
Hardware arrangements for backup · CPC title
Backup restoration techniques · CPC title
Asynchronous techniques · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.