Clay stabilization with control of migration of clays and fines
US-2016347983-A1 · Dec 1, 2016 · US
US9714929B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9714929-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414228275-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 28, 2014 |
| Priority date | Apr 2, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jul 25, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jul 25, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Methods to classify a proppant with respect to functional performance is described and includes measuring a coefficient of restitution for the proppant. Methods to select a proppant, methods to design a proppant, methods to predict proppant performance in a subterranean formation, and methods for providing product specifications for proppants are also described as well as other uses.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method to classify a proppant with respect to functional performance in a subterranean formation, said method comprising: providing the proppant, wherein the proppant comprise a sintered metal oxide coating on a ceramic core, dropping the proppant on a surface; and sorting particles of the proppant based upon a rebound distance of the proppant. 2. A method to select a proppant for use in a subterranean formation, said method comprising: providing the proppant, wherein the proppant comprise a sintered metal oxide coating on a ceramic core; determining a coefficient of restitution for the proppant, the determining comprising dropping the proppant on a surface, measuring a rebound height, and calculating the coefficient using the rebound height; comparing the coefficient of restitution of the proppant to a coefficient of restitution of a control proppant; and selecting the proppant if the coefficient of restitution of the proppant is at least 10% greater than the coefficient of restitution of the control proppant. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a horizontal surface. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a surface slanted at 25 degrees to 45 degrees. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a glass surface. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the proppant comprises proppant from a single production batch. 7. The method of claim 2 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a horizontal surface. 8. The method of claim 2 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a surface slanted at 25 degrees to 45 degrees. 9. The method of claim 2 , wherein the step of dropping is performed on a glass surface. 10. The method of claim 2 , wherein the control proppant is 20/40 mesh Ottawa sand. 11. The method of claim 2 , wherein the step of determining comprises dropping the proppant from more than one height. 12. The method of claim 2 , wherein the height is from 4 inches to 12 inches.
Sorting according to other particular properties {(material testing per se G01N; quality control G07C3/14)} · CPC title
Earth materials (G01N33/42 takes precedence) · CPC title
reinforcing fractures by propping · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.