User-modifiable word lattice display for editing documents and search queries
US-8972240-B2 · Mar 3, 2015 · US
US9711145B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9711145-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615350309-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 14, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jan 5, 2010 |
| Publication date | Jul 18, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jul 18, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The subject matter of this specification can be implemented in, among other things, a computer-implemented method for correcting words in transcribed text including receiving speech audio data from a microphone. The method further includes sending the speech audio data to a transcription system. The method further includes receiving a word lattice transcribed from the speech audio data by the transcription system. The method further includes presenting one or more transcribed words from the word lattice. The method further includes receiving a user selection of at least one of the presented transcribed words. The method further includes presenting one or more alternate words from the word lattice for the selected transcribed word. The method further includes receiving a user selection of at least one of the alternate words. The method further includes replacing the selected transcribed word in the presented transcribed words with the selected alternate word.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method comprising: providing, for output, a first user interface that includes a virtual keyboard including a control for initiating speech-to-text input; receiving (i) data indicating a selection of the control included in the virtual keyboard that is included in the user interface, and (ii) audio data comprising an utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected; generating, by an automated speech recognizer, a speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected; and providing, for output, a second user interface that includes a representation of the speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the representation of the speech recognition lattice is a transcription corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the keyboard was selected that is identified as a best hypothesis from among one or more transcriptions corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the keyboard was selected. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising: receiving data indicating a selection of a portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; providing, for output, a third user interface that includes one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; receiving data indicating a selection of a particular alternate from among the one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for output, a fourth user interface that includes a second representation of the speech recognition lattice that includes the particular alternate selected from among the one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising: receiving data indicating a selection of a portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; providing, for output, a third user interface that includes a control for removing the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; receiving data indicating a selection of the control for removing the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for output, a fourth user interface that includes a second representation of the speech recognition lattice that does not include the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the second user interface includes a second representation of the speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , comprising: providing, for output in the second user interface, a control for replacing the representation of the speech recognition lattice with the second representation of the speech recognition lattice; receiving data indicating a selection of the control for replacing the representation of the speech recognition lattice with the second representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for output, a third user interface that includes the second representation of the speech recognition lattice in place of the representation of the speech recognition lattice. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising: receiving data indicating a selection of a portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for output, a third user interface that includes a second representation of the speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected, wherein a portion of the second representation of the speech recognition lattice that corresponds to the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice is different from the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice. 8. A system for correcting words in transcribed text, the system comprising: an automated speech recognizer operable to receive speech audio data and in response transcribe the speech audio data in a word lattice; and a computing device comprising: a microphone operable to receive speech audio and generate the speech audio data, a network interface operable to send the speech audio data to the automated speech recognizer and in response receive the word lattice from the automated speech recognizer, a display screen operable to present one or more transcribed words from the word lattice, a user interface operable to receive a user selection of at least one of the transcribed words, and one or more processors and a memory storing instructions that when executed by the processors cause the computing device to perform operations to: provide, for output, a first user interface that includes a virtual keyboard including a control for initiating speech-to-text input; receive (i) data indicating a selection of the control included in the virtual keyboard that is included in the user interface, and (ii) audio data comprising an utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected; generate, by the automated speech recognizer, a speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected; and provide, for output, a second user interface that includes a representation of the speech recognition lattice corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the virtual keyboard was selected. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the representation of the speech recognition lattice is a transcription corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the keyboard was selected that is identified as a best hypothesis from among one or more transcriptions corresponding to the utterance that was spoken after the control included in the keyboard was selected. 10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the operations comprise: receiving data indicating a selection of a portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; providing, for output, a third user interface that includes one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; receiving data indicating a selection of a particular alternate from among the one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for output, a fourth user interface that includes a second representation of the speech recognition lattice that includes the particular alternate selected from among the one or more alternates for the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice. 11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the operations comprise: receiving data indicating a selection of a portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; providing, for output, a third user interface that includes a control for removing the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; receiving data indicating a selection of the control for removing the selected portion of the representation of the speech recognition lattice; and providing, for outpu
Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue · CPC title
Distributed recognition, e.g. in client-server systems, for mobile phones or network applications · CPC title
Assessment or evaluation of speech recognition systems · CPC title
by partitioning the display area of the touch-screen or the surface of the digitising tablet into independently controllable areas, e.g. virtual keyboards or menus · CPC title
Constructional details of speech recognition systems · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.