Managing a software-patch submission queue

US9710253B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9710253-B2
Application numberUS-201514742566-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJun 17, 2015
Priority dateApr 16, 2015
Publication dateJul 18, 2017
Grant dateJul 18, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Queued software patches are analyzed before one patch is chosen as the next patch to be integrated into a working build. The chosen patch might not be next in chronological order of arrival at the queue. Instead, an illustrative build server applies a number of priority factors to every patch awaiting integration in the patch queue, specifically by analyzing one or more relevant attributes of the patch. The patch that receives the highest priority score in the course of the evaluation is then extracted for integration. After the patch has been integrated, the build server (e.g., using an illustrative patch queue manager module) circles back and again evaluates all the patches in the current queue, which may have queued new patches that were submitted while the previous patch was being integrated. Relative to a default chronological order, a given patch may receive a boost in priority or, conversely, may have its priority reduced.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for managing software patch submissions for integration into a working build, the method comprising executing on a first computing device the steps of: receiving, by the first computing device, a plurality of software patches from one or more second computing devices, wherein each software patch comprises one or more executable software files and is submitted for integration into a first set of executable software files that collectively defines a working build; queueing, by the first computing device, the plurality of submitted software patches into a queue; assigning, by the first computing device, to each software patch in the queue, a respective priority score based on at least one of: (a) a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (b) a time of day at a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (c) an indication that the respective software patch fixes a problem of an earlier software patch that failed integration into the working build, (d) an indication that the respective software patch previously had its priority score lowered due to a failed dependency on an antecedent software patch and which dependency is currently satisfied, (e) an indication that the respective software patch was successfully tested with one or more customers before being submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (f) whether the respective software patch was submitted to the queue after a predefined deadline, and (g) whether the respective software patch was submitted by a user who has at least one other software patch assigned to a failed-patch pool; selecting, by the first computing device, a first software patch from the queue as a next software patch to be integrated into the working build, wherein the first software patch has a highest priority score among the software patches in the queue, and wherein another software patch arrived at the queue before the first software patch; integrating the first software patch into the working build, resulting in an updated working build that comprises a functionality of the first software patch; and wherein the respective priority score of a given software patch is lowered when the given software patch was submitted by a user who has at least one other software patch assigned to the failed-patch pool. 2. A computer-implemented method for managing software patch submissions for integration into a working build, the method comprising executing on a first computing device the steps of: receiving, by the first computing device, a plurality of software patches from one or more second computing devices, wherein each software patch comprises one or more executable software files and is submitted for integration into a first set of executable software files that collectively defines a working build; queueing, by the first computing device, the plurality of submitted software patches into a queue; assigning, by the first computing device, to each software patch in the queue, a respective priority score based on at least one of: (a) a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (b) a time of day at a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (c) an indication that the respective software patch fixes a problem of an earlier software patch that failed integration into the working build, (d) an indication that the respective software patch previously had its priority score lowered due to a failed dependency on an antecedent software patch and which dependency is currently satisfied, (e) an indication that the respective software patch was successfully tested with one or more customers before being submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (f) whether the respective software patch was submitted to the queue after a predefined deadline, and (g) whether the respective software patch was submitted by a user who has at least one other software patch assigned to a failed-patch pool; selecting, by the first computing device, a first software patch from the queue as a next software patch to be integrated into the working build, wherein the first software patch has a highest priority score among the software patches in the queue, and wherein another software patch arrived at the queue before the first software patch; integrating the first software patch into the working build, resulting in an updated working build that comprises a functionality of the first software patch; and wherein the respective priority score of a given software patch is raised when a first geographical location where the given software patch was submitted is below a predefined geographical difference relative to a second geographical location where the working build is integrated, and the respective priority score of the given software patch is lowered when the first geographical location where the given software patch was submitted is more than the predefined geographical difference relative to the second geographical location where the working build is integrated. 3. A computer-implemented method for managing software patch submissions for integration into a working build, the method comprising executing on a first computing device the steps of: receiving, by the first computing device, a plurality of software patches from one or more second computing devices, wherein each software patch comprises one or more executable software files and is submitted for integration into a first set of executable software files that collectively defines a working build; queueing, by the first computing device, the plurality of submitted software patches into a queue; assigning, by the first computing device, to each software patch in the queue, a respective priority score based on at least one of: (a) a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (b) a time of day at a geographical location where the respective software patch was submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (c) an indication that the respective software patch fixes a problem of an earlier software patch that failed integration into the working build, (d) an indication that the respective software patch previously had its priority score lowered due to a failed dependency on an antecedent software patch and which dependency is currently satisfied, (e) an indication that the respective software patch was successfully tested with one or more customers before being submitted to the queue for integration into the working build, (f) whether the respective software patch was submitted to the queue after a predefined deadline, and (g) whether the respective software patch was submitted by a user who has at least one other software patch assigned to a failed-patch pool; selecting, by the first computing device, a first software patch from the queue as a next software patch to be integrated into the working build, wherein the first software patch has a highest priority score among the software patches in the queue, and wherein another software patch arrived at the queue before the first software patch; integrating the first software patch into the working build, resulting in an updated working build that comprises a functionality of the first software patch; and wherein the respective priority score of a given software patch is raised when a first time of day at a first geographical location where the given software patch was submitted is below a predefined ti

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • G06F8/65Primary

    Updates (security arrangements therefor G06F21/57) · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9710253B2 cover?
Queued software patches are analyzed before one patch is chosen as the next patch to be integrated into a working build. The chosen patch might not be next in chronological order of arrival at the queue. Instead, an illustrative build server applies a number of priority factors to every patch awaiting integration in the patch queue, specifically by analyzing one or more relevant attributes of t…
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Commvault Systems Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F8/65. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jul 18 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 5 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).