System for reducing transaction failure
US-12175472-B2 · Dec 24, 2024 · US
US9704105B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9704105-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615155151-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 16, 2016 |
| Priority date | Jan 18, 2013 |
| Publication date | Jul 11, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jul 11, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Various embodiments select features from a feature space. In one embodiment, a set of training samples and a set of test samples are received. A first centered Gram matrix of a given dimension is determined for each of a set of feature vectors that include at least one of the set of training samples and at least one of the set of test samples. A second centered Gram matrix of the given dimension is determined for a target value vector that includes target values from the set of training samples. A set of columns and rows associated with the at least one of the test samples in the second centered Gram matrix is set to 0. A subset of features is selected from a set of features based on the first and second centered Gram matrices.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer implemented method for reducing computation time of an information processing system when selecting features from a feature space to train one or more algorithms, the computer implemented method comprising: receiving, by a feature selection circuit, a set of training samples and a set of test samples, wherein each of the set of training samples comprises a set of features and a target value, and wherein the set of test samples comprises the set of features absent the target value; training, by the feature selection circuit, one or more learning algorithms based on subset of the set of features; and reducing, by the feature selection circuit, computation time of the information processing system during the training of the one or more learning algorithms, wherein reducing the computation time comprises: determining a first centered Gram matrix of a given dimension for each of a set of feature vectors comprising at least one of the set of training samples and at least one of the set of test samples; determining a second centered Gram matrix of the given dimension for a target value vector comprising the target values from the set of training samples; and selecting a subset of features from the set of features based on the first and second centered Gram matrices. 2. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining each of the first centered Gram matrices comprises: determining, for each of the set of feature vectors, a Gram matrix based on computing, a Gaussian kernel function on each pair of vector elements in the feature vector; and multiplying a centering matrix on each side of the Gram matrix. 3. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the second centered Gram matrix comprises: generating the target value vector with a first n values being the target values from the set of training samples, and a remaining n′ values being set to infinity, where n′ is a number of test samples in the set of test samples; determining a Gram matrix based on computing, a Gaussian kernel function of size (n+n′)×(n+n′) on each pair of vector elements in the target value vector; setting a set of columns and rows in the Gram matrix with index [n+1, . . . , n+n′] to 0; and multiplying, after the setting, a centering matrix on each side of the Gram matrix. 4. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising: concatenating each column in the second centered Gram matrix into a vector of size (n+n′)×(n+n′), where n corresponds to a number of target values in the set of training samples and n′ corresponds to a number of test samples in the set of test samples. 5. The computer implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising: concatenating each column in each of the first centered Gram matrices into one of a set of d vectors of size (n+n′)×(n+n′), where n corresponds to a number of target values in the set of training samples and n′ corresponds to a number of test samples in the set of test samples. 6. The computer implemented method of claim 5 , further comprising: generating a single matrix based on each of the set of d vectors, where each column of the single matrix is one of the set of d vectors, and where the single matrix is of a size (n+n′)×(n+n′)×d. 7. The computer implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the subset of features are selected from the single matrix and the single vector. 8. The computer implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the selecting is based on: min α ∈ • d 1 2 L _ ′ - ∑ k = 1 d α k K _ ′ ( k ) Frob 2 + λ α 1 , s . t . α 1 , … , α d ≥ 0 , where 1 2 L _ ′ -
Machine learning · CPC title
using kernel methods, e.g. support vector machines [SVM] · CPC title
based on approximation criteria, e.g. principal component analysis · CPC title
Generating training patterns; Bootstrap methods, e.g. bagging or boosting · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.