Dynamically changing members of a consensus group in a distributed self-healing coordination service

US9690675B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9690675-B2
Application numberUS-201414334162-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateJul 17, 2014
Priority dateJul 17, 2014
Publication dateJun 27, 2017
Grant dateJun 27, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

Systems, methods, and computer program products for managing a consensus group in a distributed computing cluster, by determining that an instance of an authority module executing on a first node, of a consensus group of nodes in the distributed computing cluster, has failed; and adding, by an instance of the authority module on a second node of the consensus group, a new node to the consensus group to replace the first node. The new node is a node in the computing cluster that was not a member of the consensus group at the time the instance of the authority module executing on the first node is determined to have failed.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method for managing a consensus group in a distributed computing cluster, the method comprising: reaching consensus, by at least two members of a consensus group of nodes in the distributed computing cluster, to elect an instance of an authority module executing on a first node, of the consensus group of nodes, to serve as a master instance of the authority module for the consensus group of nodes, wherein each member of the consensus group of nodes executes a respective instance of the authority module, wherein the master instance of the authority module is configured to assign locks to processes executing in the distributed computing cluster; reaching consensus, by at least two members of the consensus group of nodes, that an instance of an authority module executing on the first node, of the consensus group of nodes, has failed; reaching consensus, by the remaining members of the consensus group of nodes, to elect the instance of the authority module executing on a second node, of the consensus group of nodes, to serve as the master instance of the authority module for the consensus group; receiving, by the master authority module on the second node, an advertisement from a new node in the computing cluster via a zero-configuration networking protocol, wherein the new node comprises a node in the computing cluster that was not a member of the consensus group at the time the at least two members of the consensus group of nodes reached consensus that the instance of the authority module executing on the first node failed; and adding, by the master authority module on the second node, the new node to the consensus group to replace the first node. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: transmitting to the new node: a set of nodes in the distributed computing cluster eligible to join the consensus group; and a state of a set of locks issued to nodes in the distributed computing cluster. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: transmitting, by the instance of the authority module on the second node, to each node in the distributed computing cluster, an indication that the instance of the authority module on the second node has been elected as the master authority module for the consensus group, wherein the locks are required to access data in a storage device, wherein the distributed storage cluster comprises a secondary storage environment. 4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: adding, by the master authority module on second node, the new node to a set of available nodes in the computing cluster; and sharing the set of available nodes with members of the consensus group. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: removing, by the second node, the first node from the consensus group. 6. A distributed computing cluster, comprising: a plurality of nodes configured to provide a service to clients, each node having a processor and a memory; a consensus group of nodes formed from a subset of the plurality of nodes, the consensus group of nodes, each executing an instance of an authority module which performs operations for managing the consensus group, the operation, comprising: reaching consensus, by at least two members of the consensus group of nodes, to elect an instance of an authority module executing on a first node, of the consensus group of nodes, to serve as a master instance of the authority module for the consensus group of nodes, wherein the master instance of the authority module is configured to assign locks to processes executing in the distributed computing cluster; reaching consensus, by at least two members of the consensus group of nodes in the distributed computing cluster, that an instance of an authority module executing on the first node has failed; receiving, by the master authority module on the second node, an advertisement from a new node in the computing cluster via a zero-configuration networking protocol, wherein the new node comprises a node in the computing cluster that was not a member of the consensus group at the time the at least two members of the consensus group of nodes reached consensus that the instance of the authority module executing on the first node failed; and adding, by the master authority module on the second node, the new node to the consensus group to replace the first node. 7. The distributed computing cluster of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises: transmitting to the new node: a set of nodes in the distributed computing cluster eligible to join the consensus group; and a state of a set of locks issued to nodes in the distributed computing cluster. 8. The distributed computing cluster of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises: transmitting, by the instance of the authority module on the second node, to each node in the distributed computing cluster, an indication that the instance of the authority module on the second node has been elected as the master authority module for the consensus group, wherein the locks are required to access data in a storage device, wherein the distributed storage cluster comprises a secondary storage environment. 9. The distributed computing cluster of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises: adding, by the master authority module on second node, the new node to a set of available nodes in the computing cluster; and sharing the set of available nodes with members of the consensus group. 10. The distributed computing cluster of claim 6 , wherein the operation further comprises: removing, by the second node, the first node from the consensus group. 11. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions, which, when executed on a processor, perform operations for managing a consensus group in a distributed computing cluster, the operation comprising: reaching consensus, by at least two members of a consensus group of nodes in the distributed computing cluster, to elect an instance of an authority module executing on a first node, of the consensus group of nodes, to serve as a master instance of the authority module for the consensus group of nodes, wherein each member of the consensus group of nodes executes a respective instance of the authority module, wherein the master instance of the authority module is configured to assign locks to processes executing in the distributed computing cluster; reaching consensus, by at least two members of the consensus group of nodes, that an instance of an authority module executing on the first node, of the consensus group of nodes, has failed; reaching consensus, by the remaining members of the consensus group of nodes, to elect the instance of the authority module executing on a second node, of the consensus group of nodes, to serve as the master instance of the authority module for the consensus group; receiving, by the master authority module on the second node, an advertisement from a new node in the computing cluster via a zero-configuration networking protocol, wherein the new node comprises a node in the computing cluster that was not a member of the consensus group at the time the at least two members of the consensus group of nodes reached consensus that the instance of the authority module executing on the first node failed; and adding, by the master authority module on the second node, the new node to the consensus group to replace the first node. 12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11 , further comprising: transmitting to the new node: a set of nodes in the distributed computing cluster eligible to join the consensus group; and a state of a set of locks issued to nodes in the distributed

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • eliminating a faulty processor or activating a spare · CPC title

  • Data re-synchronization of a redundant component, or initial sync of replacement, additional or spare unit · CPC title

  • by reconfiguration of node membership · CPC title

  • Determining service level performance parameters or violations of service level contracts, e.g. violations of agreed response time or mean time between failures [MTBF] · CPC title

  • by dynamic selection of recovery network elements, e.g. replacement by the most appropriate element after failure · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9690675B2 cover?
Systems, methods, and computer program products for managing a consensus group in a distributed computing cluster, by determining that an instance of an authority module executing on a first node, of a consensus group of nodes in the distributed computing cluster, has failed; and adding, by an instance of the authority module on a second node of the consensus group, a new node to the consensus …
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Cohesity Inc
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification H04L67/10. Mapped technology areas include Electricity.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Jun 27 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).