System and method for image segmentation in generating computer models of a joint to undergo arthroplasty

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9687259-B2
Application number	US-201514946106-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Nov 19, 2015
Priority date	Apr 30, 2008
Publication date	Jun 27, 2017
Grant date	Jun 27, 2017

Abstract

A custom arthroplasty guide and a method of manufacturing such a guide are disclosed herein. The method of manufacturing the custom arthroplasty guide includes: a) generating medical imaging slices of the portion of the patient bone; b) identifying landmarks on bone boundaries in the medical imaging slices; c) providing model data including image data associated with a bone other than the patient bone; d) adjusting the model data to match the landmarks; e) using the adjusted model data to generate a three dimensional computer model of the portion of the patient bone; f) using the three dimensional computer model to generate design data associated with the custom arthroplasty guide; and g) using the design data in manufacturing the custom arthroplasty guide.

First claim

What is claimed is:

1. A method of pre-operative planning for an arthroplasty procedure, the method comprising:
receiving patient data associated with a portion of a patient bone corresponding to an arthroplasty target area, the patient data captured using a medical imaging system;
generating a model of the portion of the patient bone from golden bone data that has been modified using the patient data, the golden bone data being associated with an exemplary bone other than the patient bone; and
generating preoperative planning data from the model using a processor, the preoperative planning data specifying a location and an orientation of a treatment to the arthroplasty target area, the treatment preparing the arthroplasty target area for an arthroplasty implant to repair at least a portion of a joint associated with the portion of the patient bone.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the patient data includes image slices of the portion of the patient bone.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the golden bone data is modified by adjusting the golden bone data to match landmarks identified on bone boundaries in the patient data.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the golden bone data includes a model of the exemplary bone.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the model of the exemplary bone includes at least one of a golden femur mesh or a golden tibia mesh.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the exemplary bone is a bone type that is the same as the patient bone and is representative of what is considered to be generally normal with respect to the bone type.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein what is considered to be generally normal is determined based on at least one of: size, condition, shape, weight, age, height, race, gender, or diagnosed disease condition.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the golden bone data includes a golden mesh that is geometrically representative of the exemplary bone.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the golden bone data is modified by deforming the golden mesh to match landmarks associated with the portion of the patient bone and by modifying spline curves to match the landmarks.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the spline curves are approximated with segmentation curves generated using the deformed golden mesh.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the model of the portion of the patient bone is generated using curves modified to match landmarks associated with bone boundaries in the patient data.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the curves are generated from the golden bone mesh deformed to match the landmarks, the golden bone mesh being generated from the golden bone data.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the golden bone data is segmented.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the location and the orientation of the treatment are specified using arthroplasty guide design data including a mating region having a surface contour that is generally a negative of a surface contour of the portion of the patient bone corresponding to the arthroplasty target area such that the surface contour of the mating region is configured to matingly receive the surface contour of the portion of the patient bone in a generally matching or interdigitating manner.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the treatment includes at least one of: cutting, drilling, reaming, or resurfacing.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the repair includes restoring the joint to at least one of natural alignment or mechanical alignment.

17. One or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media storing computer-executable instructions for performing a computer process on a computing system, the computer process comprising:
receiving patient data associated with a portion of a patient bone corresponding to an arthroplasty target area;
modifying golden bone data associated with an exemplary bone other than the patient bone using the patient data;
generating a model of the portion of the patient bone from the modified golden bone data; and
generating preoperative planning data using the model, the preoperative planning data specifying a location and an orientation of a treatment to the arthroplasty target area.

18. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the golden bone data is modified by adjusting the golden bone data to match landmarks identified on bone boundaries in the patient data.

19. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the exemplary bone is a same bone type as the patient bone and is representative of what is considered to be generally normal with respect to the bone type for at least one of: size, condition, shape, weight, age, height, race, gender, or diagnosed disease condition.

20. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the treatment prepares the arthroplasty target area for an arthroplasty implant to repair a joint associated with the portion of the patient bone.

21. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 20 , wherein the repair includes restoring the joint to at least one of natural alignment or mechanical alignment.

22. The one or more tangible non-transitory computer-readable storage media of claim 17 , wherein the treatment includes at least one of: cutting, drilling, reaming, or resurfacing.

23. A method for performing an arthroplasty procedure, the method comprising:
receiving preoperative planning data generated based on a patient bone model, the patient bone model being generated using golden bone data that has been modified using patient data associated with a portion of a patient bone corresponding to an arthroplasty target area, the golden bone data being associated with an exemplary bone other than the patient bone; and
treating the arthroplasty target area based on the preoperative planning data and in a manner that allows an arthroplasty implant to repair a joint associated with the portion of the patient bone.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein treating the arthroplasty target area includes manufacturing a custom arthroplasty guide from a blank arthroplasty guide using the preoperative planning data, the custom arthroplasty guide including a mating region having a surface contour that is generally a negative of a surface contour of the portion of the patient bone corresponding to the arthroplasty target area such that the surface contour of the mating region is adapted to matingly receive the surface contour of the portion of the patient bone in a generally matching or interdigitating manner.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein the preoperative planning data is received at a cutting machine.

26. The method of claim 25 , wherein the cutting machine is a CNC milling machine.

27. The method of claim 23 , wherein the patient data includes image slices of the portion of the patient bone.

28. The method of claim 23 , wherein the golden bone data is modified by adjusting the golden bone data to match landmarks identified on bone boundaries in the patient data.

29. The method of claim 23 , wherein the exemplary bone is a same bone type as the patient bone and is representative of what is considered to be generally normal with respect to the bone type for at least one of: size, condition, shape, weight, ag

Assignees

• Howmedica Osteonics Corp

Inventors

• Pavlovskaia Elena
• Mishin Oleg
• Shpungin Boris E

Classifications

• A61B17/7013

  the shape of the element being adjustable before use (adjustable length plates A61B17/7014) · CPC title

• G06V10/46 Primary

  Descriptors for shape, contour or point-related descriptors, e.g. scale invariant feature transform [SIFT] or bags of words [BoW]; Salient regional features (colour feature extraction G06V10/56) · CPC title

• G06T7/70

  Determining position or orientation of objects or cameras (camera calibration G06T7/80) · CPC title

• A61B17/157

  Cutting tibia · CPC title

• A61B2034/107

  Visualisation of planned trajectories or target regions · CPC title