Handling information source ingestion in a question answering system
US-2016048514-A1 · Feb 18, 2016 · US
US9684726B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9684726-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514720809-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 24, 2015 |
| Priority date | Oct 18, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 20, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jun 20, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An approach is provided for updating corpora in a Question and Answer (QA) system. Ingestion of a first set of sources into a first corpus and a second set of sources into a second corpus with the second set of sources including updates to the first set of sources. A question is received. The system identifies candidate answers to the question using the sources included in the corpuses. Each candidate answer has a weighting. The system determines whether the first and second corpuses have an overlapping source from which two candidate answers were identified. If an overlapping source is found, the candidate answer from the overlapping source in the first corpus is assigned a lower weighting than the candidate answer from the second corpus. Likely answers are selected from the candidate answers based on the weighting and returned to the requestor.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method of answering questions in an information handling system comprising a processor and a memory, the method comprising: ingesting, by the system, a first set of sources into a first corpus; ingesting, by the system, a second set of sources into a second corpus, wherein the second set of sources are a subset of the first set of sources, and wherein the second set of sources include updates to the first set of sources; receiving, by the system, a question from a requestor; identifying, by the system, a plurality of candidate answers to the question using one or more sources included in the first and second corpuses, wherein a weighting is associated with each of the candidate answers; determining, by the system, whether the first and second corpuses have an overlapping source from which two or more of the candidate answers were identified; in response to determining the overlapping source, assigning, by the system, a first candidate answer from the overlapping source in the first corpus with a lower weighting than a second candidate answer from the overlapping source in the second corpus; selecting one or more likely answers from the plurality of candidate answers, wherein the selecting is based on the weighting associated with the respective candidate answers; and returning the selected likely answers to the requestor. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: ingesting a first set of passages from the first set of sources into the first corpus; selecting a second set of passages from the second set of sources, wherein the selection is based on each of the second set of passages being an update to at least one of the first set of passages; and ingesting the selected second set of passages into the second corpus. 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the ingestion into the first corpus is performed on a first ingestion cycle and the ingestion into the second corpus is performed on a second ingestion cycle, wherein the first ingestion cycle occurs less frequently than the second ingestion cycle, and wherein the method further comprises: including unselected passages from the second set of sources in a data store; and ingesting the unselected passages into the first corpus during a next first ingestion cycle. 4. The method of claim 3 further comprising: ingesting the second set of passages into the first corpus during the next first ingestion cycle; and clearing the second set of passages from the second corpus after ingestion of the second set of passages into the first corpus. 5. The method of claim 1 further comprising: associating an input date corresponding to each of the first and second set of sources, wherein the assigning of the lower weighting to the overlapping source in the first source is also based on the input date of the overlapping source in the first corpus being earlier than the input date of the overlapping source in the second corpus. 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising: ingesting, into the first corpus, a first set of one or more passages from a first source selected from the first set of sources; and identifying a second set of one or more passages from a second source selected from the second set of sources, wherein the identification is based on the second set of passages being an update to the first set of passages and the second source being the same as the first source. 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the first and second sources are selected from the group consisting of a newspaper, a magazine, a journal, and a periodical.
Search customisation based on user profiles and personalisation · CPC title
Updating · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Natural language query formulation · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.