Methods, devices and computer programs for providing a service or service component requiring a specific packet-forwarding treatment
US-2016212668-A1 · Jul 21, 2016 · US
US9674764B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9674764-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414538334-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Nov 11, 2014 |
| Priority date | Nov 11, 2014 |
| Publication date | Jun 6, 2017 |
| Grant date | Jun 6, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An example method is provided in one example embodiment and may include receiving an indication of a radio access technology (RAT) change for a user equipment (UE); determining availability of a preferred RAT type for a policy related rule associated with the UE, wherein the policy related rule includes, at least in part, the preferred RAT type for one or more service data flows for the UE; and configuring the one or more service data flows for the UE based, at least in part, on a change in availability of the preferred RAT type following the RAT change. In at least one case, the method can include routing downlink packets to the UE using the one or more service data flows for the preferred RAT type if the preferred RAT type is available.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: receiving an indication of a radio access technology (RAT) change for a user equipment (UE); determining availability of a preferred RAT type for a policy related rule associated with the UE, wherein the policy related rule includes, at least in part, the preferred RAT type for one or more service data flows for the UE; and configuring the one or more service data flows for the UE based, at least in part, on a change in availability of the preferred RAT type following the RAT change wherein based on a determination that the preferred RAT has become unavailable the configuring comprises: determining whether the one or more service data flows can be moved to a non-preferred RAT type, which is currently available to the UE, based, at least in part, on a session continuity indicator for the one or more service data flows; and moving the one or more service data flows to the non-preferred RAT type based on the session continuity indicator providing for inter-RAT session continuity. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: routing downlink packets to the UE using the one or more service data flows for the preferred RAT type based on the preferred RAT type being available. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining includes one of: determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become available following the RAT change; determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become unavailable following the RAT change; and determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has remained available following the RAT change. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein, based on the preferred RAT type becoming available, the configuring includes moving the one or more service data flows to the preferred RAT type. 5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the configuring includes removing the policy related rule for a current RAT type to which the UE is connected and installing another policy related rule for the preferred RAT type which has become available. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: determining whether an uplink packet for the policy related rule is received from the UE using the preferred RAT type; and applying an exception rating group for charging a session associated with the UE based on the uplink packet not being received from the UE using the preferred RAT type. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the preferred RAT type is WiFi for the one or more service data flows. 8. One or more non-transitory tangible media encoding logic that includes instructions for execution by a processor, wherein the execution causes the processor to perform operations comprising: receiving an indication of a radio access technology (RAT) change for a user equipment (UE); determining availability of a preferred RAT type for a policy related rule associated with the UE, wherein the policy related rule includes, at least in part, the preferred RAT type for one or more service data flows for the UE; and configuring the one or more service data flows for the UE based, at least in part, on a change in availability of the preferred RAT type following the RAT change wherein based on a determination that the preferred RAT has become unavailable the configuring comprises: determining whether the one or more service data flows can be moved to a non-preferred RAT type, which is currently available to the UE, based, at least in part, on a session continuity indicator for the one or more service data flows; and moving the one or more service data flows to the non-preferred RAT type based on the session continuity indicator providing for inter-RAT session continuity. 9. The media of claim 8 , wherein the execution causes the processor to perform further operations comprising: routing downlink packets to the UE using the one or more service data flows for the preferred RAT type based on the preferred Rat type being available. 10. The media of claim 8 , wherein determining includes one of: determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become available following the RAT change; determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become unavailable following the RAT change; and determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has remained available following the RAT change. 11. The media of claim 8 , wherein, based on the preferred RAT type becoming available, the configuring includes moving the one or more service data flows to the preferred RAT type. 12. The media of claim 11 , wherein the configuring includes removing the policy related rule for a current RAT type to which the UE is connected and installing another policy related rule for the preferred RAT type which has become available. 13. The media of claim 8 , wherein the execution causes the processor to perform further operations comprising: determining whether an uplink packet for the policy related rule is received from the UE using the preferred RAT type; and applying an exception rating group for charging a session associated with the UE based on the uplink packet not being received from the UE using the preferred RAT type. 14. An apparatus, comprising: a memory element for storing data; and a processor for executing instructions associated with the data, wherein the executing causes the apparatus to perform operations comprising: receiving an indication of a radio access technology (RAT) change for a user equipment (UE); determining availability of a preferred RAT type for a policy related rule associated with the UE, wherein the policy related rule includes, at least in part, the preferred RAT type for one or more service data flows for the UE; and configuring the one or more service data flows for the UE based, at least in part, on a change in availability of the preferred RAT type following the RAT change wherein based on a determination that the preferred RAT has become unavailable the configuring comprises: determining whether the one or more service data flows can be moved to a non-preferred RAT type, which is currently available to the UE, based, at least in part, on a session continuity indicator for the one or more service data flows; and moving the one or more service data flows to the non-preferred RAT type based on the session continuity indicator providing for inter-RAT session continuity. 15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the executing causes the apparatus to perform further operations comprising: routing downlink packets to the UE using the one or more service data flows for the preferred RAT type based on the preferred Rat type being available. 16. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein determining includes one of: determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become available following the RAT change; determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has become unavailable following the RAT change; and determining that the preferred RAT type for the one or more service data flows has remained available following the RAT change. 17. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein, based on the preferred RAT type becoming available, the configuring includes moving the one or more service data flows to the preferred RAT type. 18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the configuring includes removing the policy related rule for a current RAT type to which the UE is connected an
Electricity · mapped topic
involving mapping traffic to individual bearers or channels, e.g. traffic flow template [TFT] · CPC title
Flow control {between communication endpoints} · CPC title
based on characteristics of available antennas · CPC title
Hand-off or reselection arrangements · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.