Method for perforating a wellbore in low underbalance systems
US-9080431-B2 · Jul 14, 2015 · US
US9644460B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9644460-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615180614-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jun 13, 2016 |
| Priority date | Dec 1, 2008 |
| Publication date | May 9, 2017 |
| Grant date | May 9, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
By removing material of low permeability from within and around a perforation tunnel and creating at least one fracture at the tip of a perforation tunnel, injection parameters and effects such as outflow rate and, in the case of multiple perforation tunnels benefiting from such cleanup, distribution of injected fluids along a wellbore are enhanced. Following detonation of a charge carrier, a second explosive event is triggered within a freshly made tunnel, thereby substantially eliminating a crushed zone and improving the geometry and quality (and length) of the tunnel. In addition, this action creates substantially debris-free tunnels and relieves the residual stress cage, resulting in perforation tunnels that are highly conducive to injection under fracturing conditions for disposal and stimulation purposes, and that promote even coverage of injected fluids across the perforated interval.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method for perforating a well and for the enhancement of injection activities and stimulation of oil or gas production in an underground formation, the method comprising the steps of: a) loading a reactive liner shaped charge within a charge carrier, the reactive liner shaped charge having a reactive liner comprising at least three components selected from metals and oxides of metals such that the reactive liner is subject to explosive exothermic intermetallic reaction under detonation conditions caused by a high explosive; b) positioning the charge carrier down a wellbore adjacent to the underground formation, the underground formation including interbedded conglomerates, sandstones, and shales; and c) detonating a high explosive in the reactive liner shaped charge to cause a first explosive event; d) triggering a second explosive event as a result of the first explosive event, the second explosive event created by exothermic intermetallic interaction between reactive liner components, the explosive events clearing the perforation tunnel of an internal crush zone to produce a clear tunnel depth having an improved permeability as compared to permeability with the crush zone in place; and e) injecting a fluid into the wellbore to fracture the underground formation; whereby the method reduces a fluid pressure required to initiate the step of fracturing of the underground formation as compared to using a charge without a reactive liner. 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the perforation tunnel includes a fracture at a tip of the perforation, and further comprising stimulating the formation by forcing injected fluid out of the perforation tunnel through the fracture at the tip of the perforation tunnel into the underground formation. 3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a depth of the clear tunnel is equal to the total depth of penetration of the perforation tunnel. 4. The method of claim 1 , whereby the step of injecting fluids is at an increased fluid injection rate as compared to using a charge without a reactive liner. 5. The method of claim 1 , whereby a distribution of injected fluids across the underground formation is improved as compared to using a charge without a reactive liner. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of injecting comprises injecting a fluid selected from the group consisting of brines, acids, bases, gels, emulsions, enzymes, chemical breakers, and polymers. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least three components of the reactive liner shaped charge are selected from Al, Ce, Li, Mg, Mo, Ni, Nb, Pb, Pd, Ta, Ti, Zn, and Zr. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the the reactive liner shaped charge, further includes a component selected from the Group IV elements. 9. A method for perforating a well for the enhancement of injection activities and stimulation of oil or gas production in an underground formation, said method comprising the steps of: a) loading a plurality of reactive liner shaped charges within a charge carrier, each of the plurality of reactive shaped charges, each charge including a reactive liner formed from at least two metallic components that react with each other explosively under detonation conditions of a high explosive charge; b) positioning the charge carrier down a wellbore adjacent to the underground formation, wherein the underground formation includes interbedded conglomerates, sandstones, and shales; and c) detonating a high explosive in each of the plurality of reactive liner shaped charges, each step of detonating creating a first explosive event in each of the plurality of reactive liner shaped charges, each first explosive triggering a second explosive event in each of the plurality of reactive liner shaped charges, the first and second explosive events each creating a perforation tunnel, clearing the created perforation tunnel of debris and creating a fracture at the tip of the perforation tunnel; whereby the method reduces a fluid pressure required to initiate an hydraulic fracture relative to methods using charges without a reactive liner. 10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the reactive liner comprises a metal selected from Al, Ce, Li, Mg, Mo, Ni, Nb, Pb, Pd, Ta, Ti, Zn, or Zr. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the reactive liner further comprises a non-metal of Group IV. 12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the perforation includes a fracture at a tip of the perforation, and further comprising stimulating the formation by forcing injected fluid out of the perforation tunnel through the fracture at the tip of the perforation tunnel into the underground formation. 13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the second explosive event clears a crush zone of the perforation tunnel to produce a clear tunnel depth having an improved permeability as compared to a permeability with crush zone in place. 14. The method of claim 9 , further comprising a step of injecting fluids after the step of detonating; whereby the step of injecting fluids is at an increased fluid injection rate as compared to a method using a charge without a reactive liner. 15. The method of claim 14 , whereby a distribution of injected fluids across the underground formation is improved as compared to using a charge without a reactive liner. 16. The method of claim 9 , further comprising, after clearing the created perforation tunnel of debris and creating a fracture at the tip of the perforation tunnel, injecting a fluid selected from the group consisting of brines, acids, bases, gels, emulsions, enzymes, chemical breakers, and polymers into the perforation tunnel. 17. A method for perforating a well and minimizing near wellbore pressure losses during injection and stimulation of oil or gas production in an underground formation, said method comprising the steps of: a) loading a reactive liner shaped charge within a charge carrier, the reactive liner shaped charge having a reactive liner, the reactive liner comprising at least two metals selected to react with each other exothermically; b) positioning the charge carrier down a wellbore adjacent to the underground formation, the formation including interbedded conglomerates, sandstones, and shales, or carbonates; and c) detonating a high explosive in the reactive liner shaped charge to create a first explosive event; d) triggering a second explosive event by energy of the first explosive event, wherein the second explosive event is created by exothermic interaction between the at least two metals of the reactive liner, the first and second explosive events creating a perforation tunnel in the underground formation, clearing the perforation tunnel of debris and inducing at least one fracture at a tip of the perforation tunnel; and e) injecting a fluid into the perforation tunnel under pressure to stimulate oil or gas production; wherein the detonating of the reactive liner shaped charge minimizes near wellbore pressure losses during fluid injection, relative to methods using a charge without a reactive liner. 18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least two metals are selected from Al, Ce, Li, Mg, Mo, Ni, Nb, Pb, Pd, Ta, Ti, Zn, or Zr. 19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the reactive liner further comprises a non-metal of Group IV. 20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the perforation includes a fracture at a tip of the perforation, and further comprising stimulating the formation by forcing injected fluid out of the perforation tunnel through the fracture at the tip of the perforation tunnel into the undergro
using explosives · CPC title
Relative timing of multiple charges ({F42D1/043 and } F42D1/055 take precedence) · CPC title
using explosives · CPC title
Shaped-charge perforators (E21B43/118 takes precedence) · CPC title
with cavities in the charge, e.g. hollow-charge blasting cartridges · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.