Monitoring optical decay in fiber connectivity systems
US-9219543-B2 · Dec 22, 2015 · US
US9641252B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9641252-B2 |
| Application number | US-201214418818-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 3, 2012 |
| Priority date | Aug 3, 2012 |
| Publication date | May 2, 2017 |
| Grant date | May 2, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of optimizing optical signal quality in an optical communications link comprising a plurality of sections each comprising an optical amplification apparatus and an optical fiber span, the method comprising: for each section, determining a respective optimal optical channel power which minimizes a sum of an indication of a respective linear optical noise and an indication of a respective nonlinear optical noise; and generating and transmitting at least one control signal arranged to cause a target optical channel power of each section to be set to the respective optimal optical channel power.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of optimizing optical signal quality in an optical communications link comprising a plurality of sections each comprising an optical amplification apparatus and an optical fibre span, the method comprising: for each section, determining a respective optimal optical channel power which minimizes a sum of an indication of a respective linear optical noise and an indication of a respective nonlinear optical noise; and generating and transmitting at least one control signal arranged to cause a target optical channel power of each section to be set to the respective optimal optical channel power. 2. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein: the optical communications link further comprises a further optical amplification apparatus following the plurality of sections; for each section, the respective nonlinear optical noise comprises that generated at an input end of the optical fibre span and the linear optical noise comprises that generated at an output end of the optical fibre span; and the indication of the linear optical noise is the inverse of the signal to noise ratio, SNR, of the linear optical noise of the section and the indication of the nonlinear optical noise is the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear optical noise of the section. 3. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the optimal optical channel power is the optical channel power for which the inverse of the SNR of the linear noise is equal to twice the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear noise. 4. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein each optical amplification apparatus comprises an optical amplifier, and wherein, for each section, the respective nonlinear optical noise comprises that generated in the optical fibre span after the respective optical amplifier and the respective linear optical noise comprises that generated at the optical amplifier of the subsequent section. 5. A method as claimed in claim 4 , wherein the optimal optical channel power, P OPT , of a section is determined as P OPT = ( n 2 a ) 1 / 3 , where n is the linear noise coefficient of the section and a is the nonlinear noise coefficient of the section. 6. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the optimal optical channel power is determined by calculating the sum of the inverse of the SNR of the linear optical noise and the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear optical noise for each of a plurality of different optical channel powers and interpolating the calculated sum values to identify the optical channel power for which the sum has a minimum value. 7. A method as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the optimal optical channel power is determined by calculating the sum of the inverse of the SNR of the linear optical noise and the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear optical noise for each of a plurality of different optical channel powers and identifying from the calculated sum values the optical channel power for which the sum has a minimum value. 8. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises determining whether each optical amplification apparatus has a noise figure which depends on its optical gain in a known way or an unknown way or has a noise figure which is independent of its optical gain, and if the noise figure depends on the optical gain in a known way determining the respective optimal optical channel power of each section substantially in parallel or in series forwards, starting with the first section and finishing with the last section, and if the noise figure depends on the optical gain in an unknown way or is independent of its optical gain, determining the respective optimal optical channel power of each section recursively backwards, starting with the last section and finishing with the first section. 9. A method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the method comprises setting a target optical channel power to be output at a receiving end of the optical communications link and then determining the respective optimal optical channel power of each section recursively backwards from the receiving end in accordance with the target optical channel power. 10. An optical network element for an optical communications link, wherein the optical communications link comprises a plurality of sections each comprising an optical amplification apparatus and an optical fibre span, the optical network element comprising: an optical channel signal output configured to output an optical channel signal to the optical communications link; and a controller configured to: determine a respective optimal optical channel power for each section, the optimal optical channel power minimizing a sum of an indication of a respective linear optical noise and an indication of a respective nonlinear optical noise; and generate at least one control signal arranged to cause a target optical channel power of each section to be set to the respective optimal optical channel power. 11. An optical network element as claimed in claim 10 , wherein: the optical communications link further comprises a further optical amplification apparatus following the plurality of sections; for each section, the respective nonlinear optical noise comprises that generated at an input end of the optical fibre span and the respective linear optical noise comprises that generated at an output end of the optical fibre span; and the indication of the linear optical noise is the inverse of the signal to noise ratio, SNR, of the linear optical noise of the section and the indication of the nonlinear optical noise is the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear optical noise of the section. 12. An optical network element as claimed in claim 11 , wherein the optimal optical channel power is the optical channel power for which the inverse of the SNR of the linear noise is equal to twice the inverse of the SNR of the nonlinear noise. 13. An optical network element as claimed in claim 11 , wherein each optical amplification apparatus comprises an optical amplifier, and wherein, for each section, the respective nonlinear optical noise comprises that generated in the optical fibre span after the respective optical amplifier and the respective linear optical noise comprises that generated at the optical amplifier of the subsequent section. 14. An optical network element as claimed in claim 13 , wherein the controller is configured to determine the optimal optical channel power, P OPT , of a section as P OPT = ( n 2 a ) 1 / 3
using an optical service channel · CPC title
with a cascade of amplifiers · CPC title
Signal power control · CPC title
Network aspects, e.g. central monitoring of transmission parameters · CPC title
Performance monitoring; Measurement of transmission parameters · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.