Drilling framework
US-2024419867-A1 · Dec 19, 2024 · US
US9639637B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9639637-B2 |
| Application number | US-201314015084-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 30, 2013 |
| Priority date | Oct 8, 2012 |
| Publication date | May 2, 2017 |
| Grant date | May 2, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method for predicting fatigue crack growth in materials includes providing a prior distribution obtained using response measures from one or more target components using a fatigue crack growth model as a constraint function, receiving new crack length measurements, providing a posterior distribution obtained using the new crack length measurements, and sampling the posterior distribution to obtain crack length measurement predictions.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for predicting fatigue crack growth in materials, comprising: providing, via a processor, a prior distribution obtained using response measures from one or more target components using a fatigue crack growth model as a constraint function; receiving, via the processor, new crack length measurements; generating, via the processor, a posterior distribution based on the new crack length measurements; sampling, via the processor, the posterior distribution for generating crack length measurement predictions, wherein the prior distribution is expressed as p 0 (θ)∝exp{λM(θ)}, wherein M is the fatigue crack growth model, θ is a fatigue crack growth model parameter, M(θ) is the output of the fatigue crack growth model, and λ is a Lagrange multiplier, and the constraint function is expressed as E p 0 (θ) [M(θ)]= α , wherein α is a mean of the response measures from one or more target components; and the posterior distribution is expressed as p ( θ ) ∝ exp [ λ M ( θ ) ] exp { - 1 2 ∑ i = 1 n [ a i - M i ( θ ) σ ɛ ] 2 } , where a i represents new crack length measurements associated with the one or more target components, σ ε is a standard deviation of Gaussian likelihood, and n is a total number of new crack length measurements; and wherein the Lagrange multiplier λ is obtained by solving, via the processor, ∂ ln ∫ λ M ( θ ) ⅆ θ ∂ λ = a _ ; and predicting, via the processor, fatigue crack growth in the material based on the posterior distribution. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the posterior distribution is sampled using a Markov-chain Monte-Carlo simulation. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein σ ε =√{square root over (σ ε 1 2 +σ ε 2 2 )}, wherein σ ε 1 is a standard deviation associated a statistical uncertainty of the fatigue crack growth model M, and σ ε 2 is a standard deviation associated with a measurement uncertainty. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising updating the posterior distribution as new crack length measurements are received. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the fatigue crack growth model is Paris' model, expressed as ⅆ a ⅆ N = c ( Δ K ) m , wherein a is a crack size, N is a number of applied cyclic loads, Δ K = π a Δ
Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title
Probabilistic or stochastic CAD · CPC title
Ageing analysis or optimisation against ageing · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.