Seismic data acquisition system comprising modules associated with units connected to sensors, the modules being autonomous with respect to power supply, synchronisation and storage
US-2015378038-A1 · Dec 31, 2015 · US
US9632193B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9632193-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414529690-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Oct 31, 2014 |
| Priority date | Nov 1, 2013 |
| Publication date | Apr 25, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 25, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Computer-implemented method for determining optimal sampling grid during seismic data reconstruction includes: a) constructing an optimization model, via a computing processor, given by min u ∥Su∥ 1 s.t. ∥Ru−b∥ 2 ≦σ wherein S is a discrete transform matrix, b is seismic data on an observed grid, u is seismic data on a reconstruction grid, and matrix R is a sampling operator; b) defining mutual coherence as μ ≤ C S m ( log n ) 6 , wherein C is a constant, S is a cardinality of Su, m is proportional to number of seismic traces on the observed grid, and n is proportional to number of seismic traces on the reconstruction grid; c) deriving a mutual coherence proxy, wherein the mutual coherence proxy is a proxy for mutual coherence when S is over-complete and wherein the mutual coherence proxy is exactly the mutual coherence when S is a Fourier transform; and d) determining a sample grid r * =arg min r μ(r).
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for determining optimal sampling grid during seismic data reconstruction, the method comprising: a) constructing an optimization model, via a computing processor, given by min u ∥Su∥ 1 s.t. ∥Ru−b∥ 2 ≦σ wherein S is a discrete transform matrix, b is seismic data on an observed grid, u is seismic data on a reconstruction grid, σ represents noise level in observed data, and matrix R is a sampling operator; b) defining mutual coherence as μ ( r ) = max l ≠ 0 r ^ l = max l ≠ 0 ∑ k = 1 n r k ω kl wherein r is sampling grid, {circumflex over (r)} 1 are Fourier transform coefficients, ω=exp(−2π√{square root over (−1)}/n), and n is number of elements in r; c) deriving a mutual coherence proxy, wherein the mutual coherence proxy is a proxy for mutual coherence when S is over-complete and wherein the mutual coherence proxy is exactly the mutual coherence when S is a Fourier transform; and d) determining a sample grid r * =arg min r μ(r). 2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample grid is determined via randomized greedy algorithm method. 3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the randomized greedy algorithm method finds local minimum. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample grid is determined via stochastic global optimization method. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein r * =arg min r μ(r) is non-convex. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mutual coherence proxy is derived using fast Fourier transform.
Effecting static or dynamic corrections on records, e.g. correcting spread; Correlating seismic signals; Eliminating effects of unwanted energy · CPC title
Sparse arrays · CPC title
Synthetically generated data · CPC title
Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design (G01V1/3808, G01V1/42 take precedence) · CPC title
Analysis · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.