Systems and methods for employing document snapshots in transaction rooms for digital transactions
US-9292876-B1 · Mar 22, 2016 · US
US9626653B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9626653-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514859944-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Sep 21, 2015 |
| Priority date | Sep 21, 2015 |
| Publication date | Apr 18, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 18, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Improved workflows allow delegation of authority to electronically sign a document according to a delegation rule. The delegation rule specifies a document criterion and a delegate who is authorized to sign documents meeting the criterion. The criterion may be based on subject matter, document originator, or receipt time. Delegation rules can also be invoked in response to specified conditions or events, such as receipt of an automated out-of-office notification, or failure to receive any response to a signature request within a certain time. When an electronic signature system processes a document meeting the specified criterion, or detects one of the specified conditions or events, the document is sent to the delegate for signature instead of the originally intended signatory. The workflow initiator and delegator are optionally notified of such delegation before the document is sent to the delegate, thus giving him/her a degree of control over the delegation.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented electronic signature acquisition method comprising: receiving, from an intended signatory, a delegation rule that specifies a delegate having signature authority for the intended signatory; receiving, from a document originator, an electronic document that is to be distributed to the intended signatory as part of an electronic signature workflow, wherein the electronic document includes one or more document terms; determining that the delegation rule applies to the electronic document; sending, to the document originator, a notification that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority for the electronic document to the delegate, wherein the notification includes a request for the document originator to approve delegation of signature authority for the electronic document to the delegate; sending, to the delegate, instructions for assenting to the one or more document terms; modifying the electronic document to include an electronic signature of the delegate and a chain of delegation indicating that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority to the delegate; and recording audit data in an audit data repository, the audit data specifying the chain of delegation and characterizing the electronic signature of the delegate. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, from the document originator, instructions setting forth one or more conditions that delegation of signature authority from the intended signatory to the delegate must satisfy, wherein the one or more conditions includes a prohibition on further delegation of signature authority from the delegate to another party. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving, from the intended signatory, a reason for delegation of signature authority to the delegate, wherein the notification sent to the document originator includes the reason. 4. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the delegation rule further specifies a document characteristic; and determining that the delegation rule applies to the electronic document further comprises determining that the document characteristic applies to the electronic document. 5. The method of claim 1 , wherein: the delegation rule further specifies a keyword; and determining that the delegation rule applies to the electronic document further comprises determining that the electronic document contains the keyword. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining that the delegation rule applies to the electronic document further comprises: sending the intended signatory initial instructions for assenting to the one or more document terms; and determining that a specified time period has elapsed after sending the initial instructions without receiving any reply from the intended signatory. 7. An electronic signature server system comprising a memory device and a processor that is operatively coupled to the memory device, wherein the processor is configured to execute instructions stored in the memory device that, when executed, cause the processor to carry out an electronic signature delegation process that comprises: receiving, from an intended signatory, parameters that define a delegation rule that specifies a delegate having signature authority for the intended signatory; receiving, from a document originator, metadata that identifies a document that is to be distributed to the intended signatory as part of a workflow, wherein the document includes a plurality of document terms; sending, to the intended signatory, first instructions for assenting to the plurality of document terms; receiving an autoreply notification that is sent on behalf of the intended signatory, and that is sent in response to sending the first instructions to the intended signatory; in response to receiving the autoreply notification, determining applicability of the delegation rule; sending, to the document originator, a request for the document originator to approve delegation of signature authority for the document to the delegate; and sending, to the delegate, second instructions for assenting to the plurality of document terms in response to determining that the delegation rule is applicable. 8. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the electronic signature delegation process further comprises: receiving, from the intended signatory, a reason for delegation of signature authority to the delegate; and sending, to the delegate with the second instructions, the reason for delegation of signature authority. 9. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the electronic signature delegation process further comprises: parsing the autoreply notification to identify a return date for the intended signatory; and modifying the delegation rule to expire on the return date. 10. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the parameters that define the delegation rule specify a first delegate having signature authority for the intended signatory during a first time period, and a second delegate having signature authority for the intended signatory during a second time period. 11. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the electronic signature delegation process further comprises modifying the document to include an electronic signature of the delegate and a chain of delegation indicating that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority to the delegate. 12. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the first and second instructions are functionally equivalent. 13. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the electronic signature delegation process further comprises sending, to the document originator, a delegation notification that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority for the document to the delegate. 14. The electronic signature system of claim 7 , wherein the electronic signature delegation process further comprises receiving, from the document originator, instructions with respect to whether the document originator must preapprove a delegation of signature authority before the delegate is sent the second instructions. 15. A computer program product encoded with instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause a document workflow process to be carried out, the process comprising: receiving, from an intended signatory, a delegation rule that specifies a delegate having signature authority for the intended signatory; receiving, from a document originator, an electronic document that is to be distributed to the intended signatory, wherein the electronic document includes one or more document terms; determining that the delegation rule applies to the electronic document; sending, to the document originator, a notification that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority for the electronic document to the delegate, wherein the notification includes a request for the document originator to approve delegation of signature authority for the electronic document to the delegate; sending, to the delegate, instructions for assenting to the one or more document terms; modifying the electronic document to include an electronic signature of the delegate; and recording audit data in an audit data repository, the audit data (a) specifying a chain of delegation indicating that the intended signatory has delegated signature authority to the delegate, and (b) characterizing the electronic signature of the delegate. 16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the document workflow process further com
Workflow collaboration or project management · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.