TARGET-BASED METHOD FOR HIGH-THROUGHPUT AND SUBCLASS SPECIFIC IgG GLYCAN PROFILING IN HUMAN PLASMA
US-2024353417-A1 · Oct 24, 2024 · US
US9625470B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9625470-B2 |
| Application number | US-201313888841-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 7, 2013 |
| Priority date | May 7, 2013 |
| Publication date | Apr 18, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 18, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method of identifying a related peak set from MS1 spectra data is provided. An intensity peak is selected from MS1 spectra data generated for a sample by a tandem mass spectrometer. A peak location is identified for the selected intensity peak. An intensity score is calculated from the MS1 spectra data for each of a plurality of possible related peak locations based on an intensity value associated with each of the plurality of possible related peak locations. Whether or not any of the plurality of possible related peak locations forms a related peak set is determined based on the calculated intensity score for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A device comprising: a processor; and a computer-readable medium operably coupled to the processor, the computer-readable medium having computer-readable instructions stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, cause the device to select an intensity peak from MS1 spectra data generated for a sample by a tandem mass spectrometer; identify a peak location for the selected intensity peak; calculate an intensity score, from the MS1 spectra data, for each of a plurality of possible related peak locations based on an intensity value associated with each of the plurality of possible related peak locations; determine if any of the plurality of possible related peak locations forms a related peak set based on the calculated intensity score for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations, wherein the related peak set includes the identified peak location; and when a related peak set is formed, perform an MS2 scan for at least one peak location selected from the related peak set using the tandem mass spectrometer. 2. The device of claim 1 , further comprising the tandem mass spectrometer. 3. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having stored thereon computer-readable instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to: select an intensity peak from MS1 spectra data generated for a sample by a tandem mass spectrometer; identify a peak location for the selected intensity peak; calculate an intensity score, from the MS1 spectra data, for each of a plurality of possible related peak locations based on an intensity value associated with each of the plurality of possible related peak locations; determine if any of the plurality of possible related peak locations forms a related peak set based on the calculated intensity score for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations, wherein the related peak set includes the identified peak location; and when a related peak set is formed, perform an MS2 scan for at least one peak location selected from the related peak set using the tandem mass spectrometer. 4. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the sample is generated as a sample stream from a liquid chromatography column. 5. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the MS1 spectra data is generated by a survey scan that determines a mass-to-charge ratio of intact peptides. 6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computing device to select all of the peak locations in the related peak set to perform the MS2 scan for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations determined to be a related peak in the related peak set. 7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computing device to not perform the MS2 scan for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations determined to be a related peak in the related peak set. 8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein a possible related peak location is determined based on Δ m / z = N T × m N C , where N T is a number of tags, m is a mass defined based on a chemical tag type, and N C is a charge state number. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the charge state number is known and treated as a constant for each of the plurality of possible related peak locations. 10. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the number of tags is defined as a range of values and the plurality of possible related peak locations are defined by iterations through the range of values. 11. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the intensity score is calculated for a set of related peaks using S=Σ i=1 N S Log(I i (W)), where S is the intensity score, N S is a number of possible peaks in the set of related peaks, I i is the intensity value for the associated related peak of the plurality of possible related peak locations at a given width W. 12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the set of related peaks is associated with a plurality of tag types. 13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the possible related peak locations are determined based on an assumption that the selected peak is one of the plurality of tag types. 14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the intensity score is calculated for the set of related peaks only if the intensity value for each related peak of the set of related peaks satisfies a threshold value. 15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the related peak set is determined as the selected intensity peak and the possible related peak location that results in a maximum value of the calculated intensity score. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the related peak set is determined only if the calculated intensity score satisfies a threshold value. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein the computer-readable instructions further cause the computing device to select a second intensity peak from the MS1 spectra data generated for the sample by the tandem mass spectrometer. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 3 , wherein calculating the intensity score comprises: identifying a possible related peak location based on a calculated differential location value and the identified peak location for a set of related peaks; determining an intensity value associated with the identified possible related peak location from the MS1 spectra data; and adding the determined intensity values for each possible related peak location of the set of related peaks. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the set of related peaks is associated with a plurality of tag types. 20. A method of identifying a related peak set from MS1 spectra data, the method comprising: selecting, by a processor, an intensity peak from MS1 spectra data generated for a sample by a tandem mass spectrometer; identifying, by the processor, a peak location for the selected intensity peak; calculating, by the processor, an intensity score, from the MS1 spectra data, for each of a plurality of possible related peak locations based on an intensity value associated with each of the plurality of possible related peak locations; and determining, by the processor, if any of the plurality of possible related peak locations forms a related peak set based on the calculated intensity score for each of the plurality of possible related
Step by step routines describing the handling of the data generated during a measurement · CPC title
Methods of protein analysis involving mass spectrometry · CPC title
Step by step routines describing the use of the apparatus (H01J49/0081 takes precedence) · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.