Method for printing a colour pixel matrix on a physical medium by printing oblique lines and associated control device
US-2015373226-A1 · Dec 24, 2015 · US
US9621762B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9621762-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213346231-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Jan 9, 2012 |
| Priority date | Jan 9, 2012 |
| Publication date | Apr 11, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 11, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A printing system is disclosed. The printing system includes a halftone calibration system that receives one or more un-calibrated halftones, generates one or more calibrated halftones using an ink model from the one or more un-calibrated halftones, analyzes a printed calibration screen of the one or more calibrated halftones, and performs a halftone calibration.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A non-transitory machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, cause the machine to perform operations comprising: receiving one or more un-calibrated halftones; generating one or more calibrated halftones from the one or more un-calibrated halftones employing an ink model by: computing ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones; computing ink coverage for a desired optical density; and comparing the computed ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones with the computed ink coverage for the desired target optical density, wherein ink coverage is defined as a total ink mass applied to a unit area; analyzing a printed calibration screen of the one or more calibrated halftones; and performing a halftone calibration. 2. The article of manufacture of claim 1 wherein the ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones is computed using a lookup table. 3. The article of manufacture of claim 2 wherein the ink coverage for the desired optical density is computed using a sigmoidal optical density curve. 4. The article of manufacture of claim 3 wherein comparing the computed ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones with the computed ink coverage for the desired optical density comprises determining a mapping between the one or more un-calibrated halftones and the sigmoidal optical density curve. 5. The article of manufacture of claim 4 wherein the mapping is computed using a four parameter Weibull cumulative distribution function. 6. The article of manufacture of claim 1 wherein analyzing the calibrated screen comprises calculating a mean optical density for each nozzle in a print head, deriving corresponding ink coverage per nozzle, predicting optical densities for tint values based on a sigmoidal target optical density curve using measured and predicted data. 7. The article of manufacture of claim 1 wherein performing the halftone calibration comprises generating tone reproduction curves. 8. The article of manufacture of claim 1 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, further causes the machine to perform operations comprising generating one or more calibration halftone files. 9. A printing system comprising: a halftone calibration system to receive one or more un-calibrated halftones, generate one or more calibrated halftones from the one or more un-calibrated halftones by computing ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones, computing ink coverage for a desired optical density and comparing the computed ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones with the computed ink coverage for the desired target optical density, analyze a printed calibration screen of the one or more calibrated halftones, and perform a halftone calibration, wherein ink coverage is defined as a total ink mass applied to a unit area. 10. The printing system of claim 9 wherein the ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones is computed using a lookup table and the ink coverage for the desired optical density is computed using a sigmoidal optical density curve. 11. The printing system of claim 10 wherein comparing the computed ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones with the computed ink coverage for the desired optical density comprises determining a mapping between the one or more un-calibrated halftones and the sigmoidal optical density curve. 12. The printing system of claim 11 wherein the mapping is computed using a Weibull four parameter cumulative distribution function. 13. The printing system of claim 9 wherein analyzing the calibration screen comprises calculating a mean optical density for each nozzle in a print head, deriving corresponding ink coverage per nozzle, predicting optical densities for tint values employing a sigmoidal target optical density curve, based on measured and predicted data. 14. The printing system of claim 9 wherein performing the halftone calibration comprises generating tone reproduction curves. 15. The printing system of claim 14 wherein generating tone reproduction curves comprises performing single pass calibration across a medium web and performing dual pass calibration for overlap print head nozzles. 16. The printing system of claim 9 wherein the halftone calibration system generates one or more calibration halftone files. 17. The printing system of claim 9 wherein one or more un-calibrated halftones are 10 bit halftones and the one or more calibrated halftones are 8 bit halftones. 18. A method comprising: receiving one or more un-calibrated halftones; generating one or more calibrated halftones from the one or more un-calibrated halftones employing an ink model by: computing ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones; computing ink coverage for a desired optical density; and comparing the computed ink coverage for the one or more un-calibrated halftones with the computed ink coverage for the desired target optical density, wherein ink coverage is defined as a total ink mass applied to a unit area; analyzing a printed calibration screen of the one or more calibrated halftones; and performing a halftone calibration.
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.