Method of calibrating fracture geometry to microseismic events

US9618652B2 · US · B2

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9618652-B2
Application numberUS-201314133687-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB2
Filing dateDec 19, 2013
Priority dateNov 4, 2011
Publication dateApr 11, 2017
Grant dateApr 11, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite about a subterranean formation having a fracture network with natural fractures is provided. The wellsite is stimulated by injection of fluid into the fracture network. The method involves generating wellsite data including natural fracture parameters and obtaining measurements of microseismic events, modeling hydraulic fractures of the fracture network based on the wellsite data and defining a hydraulic fracture geometry of the hydraulic fractures, generating a stress field of the hydraulic fractures using a geomechanical model, determining shear failure parameters comprising a failure envelope and a stress state about the fracture network, determining a location of shear failure of the fracture network from the failure envelope and the stress state, and calibrating the hydraulic fracture geometry by comparing the modeled hydraulic fractures and the locations of shear failure against the measured microseismic events.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the wellsite stimulated by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network, the method comprising: generating wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining measurements of microseismic events of the subterranean formation; modeling hydraulic fractures of the fracture network based on the wellsite data and defining a hydraulic fracture geometry of the hydraulic fractures; generating a stress field of the hydraulic fractures using a geomechanical model based on the wellsite data; determining shear failure parameters comprising a failure envelope and a stress state about the fracture network; determining a location of shear failure of the fracture network from the failure envelope and the stress state; and calibrating the hydraulic fracture geometry by comparing the modeled hydraulic fractures and the locations of shear failure against the measured microseismic events. 2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the natural fracture parameters based on the calibrating. 3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising stimulating the wellsite by injecting the injection fluid into the fracture network. 4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising adjusting the stimulation operation based on the calibrating. 5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising adjusting the wellsite data by selectively repeating the method based on the calibrating. 6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining a stress field comprises performing numerical simulations. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining shear failure parameters comprises determining a stress state at one of: along the natural fractures, along the hydraulic fractures, and along a rock medium about the natural fractures. 8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the geomechanical model comprises one of: a two dimensional displacement discontinuity method, a three dimensional displacement discontinuity method, finite element numerical geomechanics code, and a finite difference code. 9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the two dimensional displacement discontinuity method comprises: providing a three dimensional correction factor; validating the two dimensional displacement discontinuity method against a three dimensional finite difference solution; and computing stresses acting on the fracture network. 10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the three dimensional displacement discontinuity method comprises: discretizing the discrete fracture network into a plurality of elements; generating an induced stress at a point by superimposing stresses from all fracture elements of the fracture network; and applying a coordinate transform. 11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calibrating comprises performing a failure assessment and calibration against the microseismic events. 12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calibrating comprises: generating plots of failure parameters by applying the stress field to points in three dimensional space; generating stress parameters at and/or along the natural fractures based on shear stresses of failure conditions; comparing stress parameters with microseismic locations and moment tensor attributes; computing stresses at observed microseismic event locations; and comparing predicted failure comprising shear slippage against the microseismic events. 13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the failure envelope is a Mohr-Coulomb failure envelope and wherein the stress state is a Mohr circle. 14. A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the wellsite stimulated by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network, the method comprising: generating wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining measurements of microseismic events of the subterranean formation; modeling hydraulic fractures of the fracture network based on the wellsite data and defining a hydraulic fracture geometry of the hydraulic fractures; generating a stress field of the hydraulic fractures using a geomechanical model based on the wellsite data; determining shear failure parameters comprising a failure envelope and a stress state about the fracture network; determining a location of shear failure of the fracture network from the failure envelope and the stress state; and calibrating the hydraulic fracture geometry by comparing the modeled hydraulic fractures and the locations of shear failure against the measured microseismic events; and adjusting the natural fracture parameters operation based on the calibrating. 15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising performing a stimulation operation comprising stimulating the wellsite by injecting the injection fluid into the fracture network. 16. The method of claim 14 , further comprising adjusting the stimulation operation based on the calibrating. 17. A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite, the wellsite positioned about a subterranean formation having a wellbore therethrough and a fracture network therein, the fracture network comprising natural fractures, the wellsite stimulated by injection of an injection fluid with proppant into the fracture network, the method comprising: performing a stimulation operation comprising stimulating the wellsite by injecting the injection fluid into the fracture network; generating wellsite data comprising natural fracture parameters of the natural fractures and obtaining measurements of microseismic events of the subterranean formation; modeling hydraulic fractures of the fracture network based on the wellsite data and defining a hydraulic fracture geometry of the hydraulic fractures; generating a stress field of the hydraulic fractures using a geomechanical model based on the wellsite data; determining shear failure parameters comprising a failure envelope and a stress state about the fracture network; determining a location of shear failure of the fracture network from the failure envelope and the stress state; and calibrating the hydraulic fracture geometry by comparing the modeled hydraulic fractures and the locations of shear failure against the measured microseismic events. 18. The method of claim 17 , further comprising adjusting the natural fracture parameters operation based on the calibrating. 19. The method of claim 17 , further comprising adjusting the stimulation operation based on the calibrating. 20. The method of claim 17 , further comprising measuring the wellsite data and the microseismic events at the wellsite.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Design optimisation, verification or simulation (optimisation, verification or simulation of circuit designs G06F30/30) · CPC title

  • Administration; Management · CPC title

  • Locating fluid leaks, intrusions or movements · CPC title

  • E21B43/267Primary

    reinforcing fractures by propping · CPC title

  • Analogue computers for specific processes, systems or devices, e.g. simulators · CPC title

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9618652B2 cover?
A method of performing a fracture operation at a wellsite about a subterranean formation having a fracture network with natural fractures is provided. The wellsite is stimulated by injection of fluid into the fracture network. The method involves generating wellsite data including natural fracture parameters and obtaining measurements of microseismic events, modeling hydraulic fractures of the …
Who is the assignee on this patent?
Schlumberger Technology Corp
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification E21B43/267. Mapped technology areas include Fixed Constructions.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Apr 11 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B2). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 2 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).