Control Device and Method for Controlling a Predictive Cruise Control
US-2024375653-A1 · Nov 14, 2024 · US
US9616890B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9616890-B2 |
| Application number | US-201514635377-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 2, 2015 |
| Priority date | Jan 10, 2011 |
| Publication date | Apr 11, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 11, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
When employing an adaptive cruise-with-braking (ACB) system to control host vehicle braking reaction distance, a plurality of trigger conditions (e.g., environmental parameters) are monitored. If one or more of the monitored parameters exceeds a predefined threshold, a trigger event is detected, and at least one of a braking reaction distance (BRD) and a following distance limit shape (FDLS) are adjusted. The BRD and FDLS adjustments may be predefined according to the type and/or magnitude of the trigger event. Trigger events may be weighted or prioritized such that higher priority trigger event types correspond to larger BRD reductions, etc. Monitored trigger conditions may include adverse weather, dangerous road terrain or topography, high traffic density, erratic forward vehicle behavior, and the like.
Opening claim text (preview).
Having thus described the preferred embodiments, the invention is now claimed to be: 1. A method of reducing an allowable braking reaction distance (BRD) for a host vehicle as a function of a detected trigger event, comprising: setting an initial BRD for the host vehicle; monitoring one or more trigger conditions; detecting a trigger event; reducing the BRD by a predefined amount that corresponds to the type of trigger event that is detected; prior to detection of the trigger event, restricting foundation braking while permitting dethrottling and engine retardation; and permitting foundation braking after detection of the trigger event. 2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the monitored trigger conditions include at least one of: a system fault condition; activation of one or more of an antilock brake system (ABS), a traction control system, and a stability control system in the host vehicle; road surface conditions; input from a tire pressure monitoring system; traffic density conditions; at least one of current and recent velocities of vehicles in the same or neighboring lanes as the host vehicle; at least one of current and recent accelerations of vehicles in the same or neighboring lanes as the host vehicle; and road terrain determined from global positioning system (GPS) information. 3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein monitoring the one or more trigger conditions comprises receiving input from at least one of an onboard camera sensor and one or more onboard radar sensors that monitor as space in front of the host vehicle to detect trigger events. 4. The method according to claim 1 , further including detecting the trigger event by comparing a measured value for the one or more monitored trigger conditions to a respective corresponding predetermined threshold value for each of the respective trigger conditions. 5. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising defining a following distance limit shape (FDLS) as a function of a lateral offset function, wherein the FDLS comprises a lateral portion that is coincident with the BRD, and two longitudinal portions that extend from the lateral portion toward the host vehicle along a path defined by the lateral offset function. 6. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising limiting a deceleration request to request activation of at least one of a dethrottling module and an engine retarder when the forward vehicle is outside of the FDLS defined by the lateral offset function. 7. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising removing restrictions on a deceleration request to permit a request for activation of foundation brakes when the forward vehicle is within the FDLS defined by the lateral offset function. 8. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising assigning weights to each trigger event type, wherein a BRD reduction for a given trigger event is proportional to a weight assigned to the given trigger event, such that different trigger events result in BRD reductions of different magnitudes. 9. A processor or computer-readable medium programmed to perform the method of claim 1 . 10. An adaptive cruise-with-braking (ACB) system that facilitates modifying or adjusting a braking reaction distance as a function of a detected trigger event, comprising: a sensor on a host vehicle that detects a forward vehicle; a deceleration system that executes one or more deceleration requests; a controller configured to: set an initial braking reacting distance (BRD); monitor one or more trigger conditions; detecting a trigger event; adjust the BRD by a predetermined distance as a function of the type of trigger event detected; prior to detection of the trigger event, restrict foundation braking while permitting dethrottling and engine retardation; and permit foundation braking after detection of the trigger event. 11. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the sensor includes at least one of a camera sensor and one or more radar sensors. 12. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the monitored trigger conditions include at least one of: a system fault condition; activation of one or more of an antilock brake system (ABS), a traction control system, and a stability control system in the host vehicle; road surface conditions; input from a tire pressure monitoring system; traffic density conditions; at least one of current and recent velocities of vehicles in the same or neighboring lanes as the host vehicle; at least one of current and recent accelerations of vehicles in the same or neighboring lanes as the host vehicle; and road terrain determined from global positioning system (GPS) information. 13. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the controller is further configured to detect the trigger event by comparing a measured value for the one or more monitored trigger conditions to a respective corresponding predetermined threshold value for each of the respective trigger conditions. 14. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the controller is further configured to define a following distance limit shape (FDLS) as a function of a lateral offset function, wherein the FDLS comprises a lateral portion that is coincident with the BRD, and two longitudinal portions that extend from the lateral portion toward the host vehicle along a path defined by the lateral offset function. 15. The system according to claim 14 , wherein the controller is further configured to limit a deceleration request to request activation of at least one of a dethrottling module and an engine retarder when the forward vehicle is outside of the FDLS defined by the lateral offset function. 16. The system according to claim 14 , wherein the controller is further configured to remove restrictions on a deceleration request to permit a request for activation of foundation brakes when the forward vehicle is within the FDLS defined by the lateral offset function. 17. The system according to claim 10 , wherein the controller is further configured to assign weights to each trigger event type, wherein a BRD reduction for a given trigger event is proportional to a weight assigned to the given trigger event, such that different trigger events result in BRD reductions of different magnitudes.
responsive to vehicle path curvature · CPC title
Input parameters relating to infrastructure · CPC title
changing distance, e.g. reducing the distance for overtaking · CPC title
including means for detecting potential obstacles in vehicle path · CPC title
Position · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.