Image forming device
US-2017289400-A1 · Oct 5, 2017 · US
US9614998B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9614998-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414287089-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | May 26, 2014 |
| Priority date | Apr 5, 2012 |
| Publication date | Apr 4, 2017 |
| Grant date | Apr 4, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A method is disclosed. The method includes generating a halftone screen using a Direct Multi-bit Search Screen Algorithm (DMSSA) to optimize a halftone pattern at each gray level.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A non-transitory machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, cause the machine to perform: generating a Continuous Tone Image (CTI) with all pixel values same as a first gray level; generating an initial Half Tone Image (HTI) with all pixel values equal to minimum absorptance level; computing a change in pixel error for a first pixel by: identifying a first pixel indicated in a valid pixel map; toggling the first pixel with all possible output states as long as a result of the toggling of the first pixel satisfies a stacking constraint; and swapping the first pixel with all neighbor pixels indicated in the valid pixel map as long as the result of the swapping of the first pixel satisfies the stacking constraint; calculating a mean squared perceived error for the first gray level; and passing centroid locations and its front facing neighbor locations to the valid pixel location map. 2. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform finding an operation with maximum error decrease for the first pixel after computing the change in pixel error for the first pixel. 3. The machine-readable medium of claim 2 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform updating the HTI and the change in pixel error for the first pixel. 4. The machine-readable medium of claim 3 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform: determining if there are additional pixels to process upon updating the HTI and the change in pixel error for the first pixel; and determining if an end criteria has been met upon determining that there are no additional pixels to process. 5. The machine-readable medium of claim 4 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform computing a change in pixel error for the first pixel if the end criteria has not been met. 6. The machine-readable medium of claim 4 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform: saving the updated HTI as a final halftone screen for that gray level if the end criteria has been met; copying the saved final halftone screen as an initial HTI for the next gray level; and updating the CTI pixel values with next gray level till the final gray value is reached. 7. The machine-readable medium of claim 6 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform storing a current gray level screen as a seed pattern. 8. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform: calculating an average minimum Euclidean distance between all ON pixels in the initial HTI; and determining if the distance is less than or equal to a predetermined minimum distance. 9. The machine-readable medium of claim 1 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by the machine, further cause the machine to perform: calculating the mean squared perceived error for a second gray level; and determining if a difference between the mean squared perceived error for the second gray and the mean squared perceived error for the first gray level is less than a predetermined threshold. 10. The machine-readable medium of claim 9 comprising a machine-readable medium including data that, when accessed by a machine, further cause the machine to perform identifying new neighbors for ON pixels upon determining that a difference between the mean squared perceived error for the second gray and the mean squared perceived error for the first gray level is less than a predetermined threshold. 11. A system comprising a processor to generate a Continuous Tone Image (CTI) with all pixel values same as a first gray level, generate an initial Half Tone Image (HTI) with all pixel values equal to minimum absorptance level, compute a change in pixel error for a first pixel by identifying a first pixel indicated in a valid pixel map, toggling the first pixel with all possible output states as long as a result of the toggling of the first pixel satisfies a stacking constraint and swapping the first pixel with all neighbor pixels indicated in the valid pixel map as long as the result of the swapping of the first pixel satisfies the stacking constraint, calculate a mean squared perceived error for the first gray level and pass centroid locations and its front facing neighbor locations to the valid pixel location map. 12. The system of claim 11 wherein the processor calculates an average minimum Euclidean distance between all ON pixels in the initial HTI and determines whether the distance is less than or equal to a predetermined minimum distance. 13. The system of claim 11 wherein the processor finds an operation with maximum error decrease for the first pixel after computing the change in pixel error for the first pixel. 14. The system of claim 13 wherein the processor updates the HTI and the change in pixel error for the first pixel. 15. The system of claim 14 wherein the processor further determines whether there are additional pixels to process upon updating the HTI and the change in pixel error for the first pixel and determines whether an end criteria has been met upon determining that there are no additional pixels to process. 16. The system of claim 15 wherein the processor further saves the updated HTI as a final halftone screen for a gray level if the end criteria has been met, copies the saved final halftone screen as an initial HTI for a next gray level; and updates the CTI pixel values with the next gray level till a final gray value is reached.
by error diffusion, i.e. transferring the binarising error to neighbouring dot decisions · CPC title
Halftoning (halftoning of still images in general H04N1/405, H04N1/52) · CPC title
with threshold modulated relative to input image data or vice versa · CPC title
Halftoning, i.e. converting the picture signal of a continuous-tone original into a corresponding signal showing only two levels · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.