Computer system and method for comparing output signals

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9612922-B2
Application number	US-201113638438-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Mar 16, 2011
Priority date	Mar 30, 2010
Publication date	Apr 4, 2017
Grant date	Apr 4, 2017

Abstract

A computer system includes at least two COTS processor cores and an evaluating device connected to the at least two COTS processor cores for evaluating output signals output by means of the at least two COTS processor cores. The evaluating device includes a comparator for pair-wise comparison of the respective generated output signals with each other. The comparator also outputs a comparison signal corresponding to the respective comparison of the output signals.

First claim

The invention claimed is:

1. A computer system, comprising:
at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores; and
an evaluation device, which is connected to the at least three COTS processor cores, the evaluation device is configured to evaluate output signals that are output from the at least three COTS processor cores, wherein the evaluation device includes a comparator configured to compare a relocatable group of the output signals that are output with one another in pairs, wherein the comparator of the evaluation device is also configured to output a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of the output signals, and wherein
at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores,
a selection device, connected to the comparator of the evaluation device, configured to select an output signal for further processing based on the comparison signal,
the at least three COTS processor cores each comprise a corresponding comparator to compare non-relocatable output signals of the output signals with one another, and
the computer system further comprises a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the comparator of the evaluation device.

2. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the selection device and the evaluation device are integrated in a logic circuit device.

3. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the at least three COTS processor cores are each formed as a logical COTS processor core or as a physical COTS processor core.

4. The computer system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a network-on-a-chip is connected to the COTS processor cores.

5. A method for comparing output signals that are output by at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores, wherein the COTS processor cores each comprise a comparator to compare a non-relocatable group of the output signals with one other and at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores, comprising the following steps:
transmitting a relocatable group of the output signals of the COTS processor cores, to an evaluation device that includes a further comparator;
comparing, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, the relocatable group of the transmitted output signals with one another in pairs; and
outputting, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of output signals,
transmitting the comparison signal to a selection device that is connected to the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the selection device selects an output signal for further processing based on the transmitted comparison signal, and
transmitting the relocatable group of the output signals by a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the further comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the further comparator of the evaluation device.

6. The method as claimed in claim 5 , wherein three output signals are classified as the same if respective parameters from the output signals are within a predetermined error tolerance range.

7. A computer program stored on a non-transitory storage medium, the computer program having program code for:
receiving output signals of at least three commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) processor cores, wherein the COTS processor cores each comprise a comparator to compare a non-relocatable group of the output signals with one other and at least one of the COTS processor cores is different than the other COTS processor cores;
comparing, by a further comparator of an evaluation device, a relocatable group of the transmitted output signals with one another in pairs;
outputting, by the further comparator of the evaluation device, a comparison signal that corresponds to the respective comparison of the relocatable group of the output signals;
transmitting the comparison signal to a selection device that is connected to the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the selection device selects an output signal for further processing based on the transmitted comparison signal; and
transmitting the relocatable group of the output signals by a switching device that is connected between the COTS processor cores and the further comparator of the evaluation device, wherein the switching device is configured to transmit the relocatable group of the output signals to the further comparator of the evaluation device on the basis of a utilization state of the further comparator of the evaluation device.

8. The computer program as claimed in claim 7 , wherein three output signals are classified as the same if respective parameters from the output signals are within a predetermined error tolerance range.

9. The method of claim 5 , further comprising classifying three of the output signals as the same if respective parameters from such output signals are within a predefined error tolerance range.

Assignees

• Geiger Dietmar
• Paulitsch Michael
• Airbus Defence & Space Gmbh

Inventors

• Geiger Dietmar
• Paulitsch Michael

Classifications

• G06F11/188

  where exact match is not required · CPC title

• G06F11/184

  where the redundant components implement processing functionality · CPC title

• G06F11/1641 Primary

  where the comparison is not performed by the redundant processing components · CPC title