Assuring chip reliability with automatic generation of drivers and assertions

US9600616B1 · US · B1

Patent metadata
FieldValue
Publication numberUS-9600616-B1
Application numberUS-201615264336-A
CountryUS
Kind codeB1
Filing dateSep 13, 2016
Priority dateNov 27, 2015
Publication dateMar 21, 2017
Grant dateMar 21, 2017

How to read this patent

A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.

  1. Title

    What the patent document calls the invention.

  2. Abstract

    A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.

  3. Assignees and inventors

    Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.

  4. Key dates

    Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.

  5. First independent claim

    The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.

  6. CPC / IPC classifications

    Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.

  7. Citations and related patents

    Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.

Abstract

Official abstract text for this publication.

A computer-implemented method may include retrieving a design netlist with a processor, identifying, via the processor, a logic structure in the design netlist, generating, via the processor, a driver based on the logic structure, applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver, and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model.

First claim

Opening claim text (preview).

What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for assuring a reliability of a chip comprising: verifying a parity with a processor; traversing, via the processor, a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying, via the processor, one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generating, via the processor, a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein generating the simulation and the formal model based on the driver further comprises: generating one of a model for formal. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein either the model for formal and the assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the one or more parity protected structures comprises: retrieving a design netlist with a processor; statistically analyzing the design netlist; extracting checking logic information from the design netlist; and extracting gating information from the design netlist by identifying a plurality of protected structures and a plurality of gating structures; and identifying the logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein generating the driver based on the logic structure comprises: verifying a parity; traversing a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generating an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 8. A system for assuring a reliability of a chip comprising: a processor configured to: verify a parity; traverse a design netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identify one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generate a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to: apply a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing an output of the simulation and the formal model. 10. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: retrieve the design netlist; statistically analyze the design netlist; extract checking logic information from the design netlist; extract gating information from the design netlist; and identify a logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 11. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: verify a validity of a parity; traverse a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identify one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generate an assertion indicative of a parity validity; and generate the driver based on the assertion. 12. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: generate one of a model for formal. 13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein either the model for formal and the assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method for assuring a reliability of a chip, the method comprising: verifying a parity with a processor; traversing, via the processor, a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying, via the processor, one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generating, via the processor, a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 further comprising: applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein generating the simulation and the formal model based on the driver further comprises: generating one of a model for formal and an assertion for simulation, wherein either the model for formal and the an assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein identifying the one or more parity protected structures comprises: retrieving a design netlist with a processor; statistically analyzing the design netlist; extracting checking logic information from the design netlist; and extracting gating information from the design netlist by identifying a plurality of protected structures and a plurality of gating structures; and identifying the logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein generating the driver based on the logic structure comprises: verifying a validity of a parity; traversing a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generating an assertion indicative of a parity validity.

Assignees

Inventors

Classifications

  • Logic synthesis; Behaviour synthesis, e.g. mapping logic, HDL to netlist, high-level language to RTL or netlist · CPC title

  • Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking · CPC title

  • Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods · CPC title

  • using formal methods, e.g. equivalence checking or property checking · CPC title

  • G06F17/504Primary

    Physics · mapped topic

Patent family

Related publications grouped by family.

External sources

Frequently asked questions

Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.

What does patent US9600616B1 cover?
A computer-implemented method may include retrieving a design netlist with a processor, identifying, via the processor, a logic structure in the design netlist, generating, via the processor, a driver based on the logic structure, applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver, and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model.
Who is the assignee on this patent?
IBM
What technology area does this patent fall under?
Primary CPC classification G06F30/3323. Mapped technology areas include Physics.
When was this patent published?
Publication date Tue Mar 21 2017 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) (B1). Legal status and post-grant events are not shown on this page.
What related patents are in patentsdb?
We list 8 related publications on this page (citations in our corpus or others sharing the same primary CPC).