Automatic compilation method and framework for generating a layout of integrated memory-compute circuit
US-2024403527-A1 · Dec 5, 2024 · US
US9600616B1 · US · B1
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9600616-B1 |
| Application number | US-201615264336-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B1 |
| Filing date | Sep 13, 2016 |
| Priority date | Nov 27, 2015 |
| Publication date | Mar 21, 2017 |
| Grant date | Mar 21, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
A computer-implemented method may include retrieving a design netlist with a processor, identifying, via the processor, a logic structure in the design netlist, generating, via the processor, a driver based on the logic structure, applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver, and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A computer-implemented method for assuring a reliability of a chip comprising: verifying a parity with a processor; traversing, via the processor, a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying, via the processor, one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generating, via the processor, a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising: applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein generating the simulation and the formal model based on the driver further comprises: generating one of a model for formal. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein either the model for formal and the assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the one or more parity protected structures comprises: retrieving a design netlist with a processor; statistically analyzing the design netlist; extracting checking logic information from the design netlist; and extracting gating information from the design netlist by identifying a plurality of protected structures and a plurality of gating structures; and identifying the logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein generating the driver based on the logic structure comprises: verifying a parity; traversing a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generating an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 8. A system for assuring a reliability of a chip comprising: a processor configured to: verify a parity; traverse a design netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identify one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generate a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the processor is further configured to: apply a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing an output of the simulation and the formal model. 10. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: retrieve the design netlist; statistically analyze the design netlist; extract checking logic information from the design netlist; extract gating information from the design netlist; and identify a logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 11. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: verify a validity of a parity; traverse a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identify one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generate an assertion indicative of a parity validity; and generate the driver based on the assertion. 12. The system of claim 8 wherein the processor is further configured to: generate one of a model for formal. 13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 14. The system of claim 13 , wherein either the model for formal and the assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method for assuring a reliability of a chip, the method comprising: verifying a parity with a processor; traversing, via the processor, a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying, via the processor, one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures comprises a duplication protection; and generating, via the processor, a driver based on a logic structure and an assertion indicative of a parity validity. 16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 further comprising: applying, via the processor, a simulation and a formal model based on the driver; and testing, via the processor, an output of the simulation and the formal model. 17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein generating the simulation and the formal model based on the driver further comprises: generating one of a model for formal and an assertion for simulation, wherein either the model for formal and the an assertion for simulation indicates a correctness status between two different sub-units of the chip. 18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 17 , further comprising generating an assertion for formal. 19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein identifying the one or more parity protected structures comprises: retrieving a design netlist with a processor; statistically analyzing the design netlist; extracting checking logic information from the design netlist; and extracting gating information from the design netlist by identifying a plurality of protected structures and a plurality of gating structures; and identifying the logic structure in the design netlist based on a statistical analysis of the design netlist, the logic information, and gating information. 20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein generating the driver based on the logic structure comprises: verifying a validity of a parity; traversing a netlist back from a plurality of netlist outputs; identifying one or more parity protected structures and one or more gates, wherein protected parity structures may comprise one or more of a duplication protection and a onehot protection; and generating an assertion indicative of a parity validity.
Logic synthesis; Behaviour synthesis, e.g. mapping logic, HDL to netlist, high-level language to RTL or netlist · CPC title
Design verification, e.g. functional simulation or model checking · CPC title
Design verification, e.g. using simulation, simulation program with integrated circuit emphasis [SPICE], direct methods or relaxation methods · CPC title
using formal methods, e.g. equivalence checking or property checking · CPC title
Physics · mapped topic
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.