Retina prosthesis
US-9220634-B2 · Dec 29, 2015 · US
US9597495B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9597495-B2 |
| Application number | US-201213452300-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Apr 20, 2012 |
| Priority date | Jun 8, 2004 |
| Publication date | Mar 21, 2017 |
| Grant date | Mar 21, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
The invention is a method of identifying a preferred location for an electrode array to the neural characteristics of an individual subject. The response to electrical neural stimulation varies from subject to subject and array location to array location. Measure of impedance may be used to predict the electrode height from the neural tissue and, thereby, predict the preferred location. Alternatively, electrode height may be measured directly to predict the preferred location.
Opening claim text (preview).
The invention claimed is: 1. A method of determining proper placement of a neural stimulation electrode array comprising: placing an electrode array of an implantable neural prosthesis in proximity of neural tissue; sending a series of wireless command signals under automatic control to the implantable neural prosthesis to measure impedances, and thereby threshold of perception, across the electrode array after providing sub-threshold of perception stimulation pulses to neural tissue on each electrode; communicating the impedances to a clinician via a wireless telemetry signal; determining, by the impedances, the distance between the electrode array and neural tissue, as well as any defective electrodes; selecting a proper chronic placement for the electrode array as the location providing the least distance between the electrode array and neural tissue, the lowest threshold of perception and the greatest dynamic range; attaching the electrode array chronically to neural tissue in the proper chronic placement; and stimulating neural percepts with the electrode array. 2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: placing the electrode array in a plurality of locations; measuring impedance across the electrode array in each location; and determining, by the impedances, the best placement of the electrode array. 3. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising: communicating the impedance to an external device; and displaying the impedance to a user on the external device. 4. The method according to claim 3 , wherein displaying the impedance to a user is displaying the impedance to a user with a graphical representation of the plurality of electrodes. 5. The method according to claim 3 , wherein displaying the impedance to a user is by sound. 6. The method according to claim 3 , wherein displaying the impedance to a user is by color. 7. The method according to claim 3 , wherein displaying the impedance to a user is by graphical symbol.
User interfaces, e.g. input or presentation means · CPC title
of the eye · CPC title
Retinal electrodes · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.