Unintentional touch rejection

Patent metadata

Field	Value
Publication number	US-9594457-B2
Application number	US-201514979910-A
Country	US
Kind code	B2
Filing date	Dec 28, 2015
Priority date	Dec 30, 2005
Publication date	Mar 14, 2017
Grant date	Mar 14, 2017

Abstract

A method for rejecting an unintentional palm touch is disclosed. In at least some embodiments, a touch is detected by a touch-sensitive surface associated with a display. Characteristics of the touch may be used to generate a set of parameters related to the touch. In an embodiment, firmware is used to determine a reliability value for the touch. The reliability value and the location of the touch is provided to a software module. The software module uses the reliability value and an activity context to determine a confidence level of the touch. In an embodiment, the confidence level may include an evaluation of changes in the reliability value over time. If the confidence level for the touch is too low, it may be rejected.

First claim

We claim:

1. A method comprising:
receiving a touch on a touch-sensitive display of a device;
identifying at least one of a height and a width of the touch;
calculating a function of at least one of an area of the touch and a shape of the touch;
based at least in part on the calculated function, determining a probability that the touch is intentional;
based at least in part on the probability, determining whether the touch meets a predetermined confidence level; and
in response to determining that the touch meets the predetermined confidence level, communicate an input associated with the touch to an application.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases as the area of the touch decreases.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases when the shape of the touch has substantially the same height and width.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
calculating a confidence level for the touch based on the probability; and
comparing the confidence level for the touch to the predetermined confidence level.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the confidence level for the touch is based at least in part on determining a reliability of the touch.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the reliability of the touch is based on one or more reliability factors comprising one or more of:
a pressure associated with the touch;
a rate of change in characteristics of the touch; and
a velocity of movement of the touch.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
identifying a location of the touch within the touch-sensitive display.

8. The method of claim 7 , further comprising determining an activity context comprising one or more of:
determining whether the location of the touch is in a window associated with an application;
determining whether the application is active;
determining whether the location being touched is an active area; and
determining whether another valid touch is being made in a different location on the touch-sensitive display.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining an activity context comprising one or more of:
determining whether multiple touches are being made substantially simultaneously;
determining whether multiple touches are expected;
determining whether a profile of the touch matches a known gesture; and
determining how the application treats touches.

10. A computing device comprising:
at least one processing unit; and
at least one memory storing computer readable instructions that when executed cause the computing device to:
receive a touch on the touch-sensitive display;
identify at least one of a height and a width of the touch;
calculate a function of at least one of an area of the touch and a shape of the touch;
based on the calculated function, determine a probability that the touch is intentional; and
based on the probability, perform one of:
identify the touch as intentional;
display a visual feedback on the graphical user interface (GUI); and
identify the touch as unintentional.

11. The computing device of claim 10 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases as the area of the touch decreases.

12. The computing device of claim 10 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases when the shape of the touch has substantially the same height and width.

13. The computing device of claim 10 , the computing device further caused to:
based at least in part on the probability, determine whether the touch meets a predetermined confidence level; and
in response to determining that the touch meets the predetermined confidence level, communicate an input associated with the touch to an application.

14. The computing device of claim 10 , the computing device further caused to:
identify a location of the touch within the touch-sensitive display.

15. The computing device of claim 14 , the computing device further caused to determine an activity context, wherein determining the activity context comprises one or more of:
determine whether the location of the touch is in a window associated with an application;
determine whether the application is active;
determine whether the location being touched is an active area; and
determine whether another valid touch is being made in a different location on the touch-sensitive display.

16. A computing device comprising at least one processing unit and at least one memory storing computer readable instructions that when executed cause the computing device to perform a method, the method comprising:
receiving a touch on the touch-sensitive display;
identifying at least one of a height and a width of the touch;
calculating a function of at least one of an area of the touch and a shape of the touch;
based at least in part on the calculated function, determining a probability that the touch is intentional;
based at least in part on the probability, determining whether the touch meets a predetermined confidence level; and
in response to determining that the touch meets the predetermined confidence level, communicating an input associated with the touch to an application.

17. The computing device of claim 16 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases as the area of the touch decreases.

18. The computing device of claim 16 , wherein the probability that the touch is intentional increases when the shape of the touch has substantially the same height and width.

19. The computing device of claim 10 , the computer readable instructions further causing the computing device to perform the method of:
identifying a location of the touch within the touch-sensitive display.

20. The computing device of claim 19 , the computer readable instructions further causing the computing device to perform the method of:
determining whether the location of the touch is in a window associated with an application;
determining whether the application is active;
determining whether the location being touched is an active area; and
determining whether another valid touch is being made in a different location on the touch-sensitive display.

Assignees

• Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc

Inventors

• Townsend Reed L
• Kolmykov-Zotov Alexander J
• Dodge Steven P
• Scott Bryan D

Classifications

• G06F3/041

  Digitisers, e.g. for touch screens or touch pads, characterised by the transducing means · CPC title

• G06F3/0418 Primary

  for error correction or compensation, e.g. based on parallax, calibration or alignment · CPC title

• G06F3/038

  Control and interface arrangements therefor, e.g. drivers or device-embedded control circuitry · CPC title

• G06F2203/0381

  Multimodal input, i.e. interface arrangements enabling the user to issue commands by simultaneous use of input devices of different nature, e.g. voice plus gesture on digitizer · CPC title

• G06F3/0488

  using a touch-screen or digitiser, e.g. input of commands through traced gestures · CPC title