Edge network monitoring and adaptation systems
US-2024364794-A1 · Oct 31, 2024 · US
US9571575B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9571575-B2 |
| Application number | US-201414473621-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Aug 29, 2014 |
| Priority date | Aug 29, 2014 |
| Publication date | Feb 14, 2017 |
| Grant date | Feb 14, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
Data consistency and availability can be provided at the granularity of logical storage objects in storage solutions that use storage virtualization in clustered storage environments. To ensure consistency of data across different storage elements, synchronization is performed across the different storage elements. Changes to data are synchronized across storage elements in different clusters by propagating the changes from a primary logical storage object to a secondary logical storage object. To satisfy the strictest RPOs while maintaining performance, change requests are intercepted prior to being sent to a filesystem that hosts the primary logical storage object and propagated to a different managing storage element associated with the secondary logical storage object.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A method comprising: receiving a filesystem request being generated from a storage protocol input/output request targeting a first local storage object, the filesystem request being intercepted prior to being sent to a filesystem; determining from synchronization configuration data that the first logical storage object has a synchronization relationship with a second logical storage object; determining from the synchronization configuration data a synchronization relationship type of the synchronization relationship from a plurality of synchronization relationship types; and where the synchronization relationship type is a semi-synchronous relationship type: accumulating, during a time interval, filesystem requests that target the first logical storage object, wherein the filesystem requests include the filesystem request; supplying each of the filesystem requests to the filesystem; determining dependencies among accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object; recording sequencing information to preserve the dependencies, the recording comprising recording the sequencing information into accumulated filesystem requests that have a dependency and that indicate a change to be made to the first logical storage object; and supplying, to a node associated with the second logical storage object, the sequencing information and accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the second logical storage object. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: where the synchronization relationship type is a full synchronization relationship type specifying that responses are not to be returned to requesters until changes are made to both primary logical storage objects and secondary logical storage objects: supplying the filesystem request to the filesystem; generating a request based on the filesystem request to create a generated request indicating that the second logical storage object is a target; supplying the generated request for transmission to the node associated with the second logical storage object; and upon the storage input/output request successfully being implemented upon the first logical storage object and the generated request successfully being implemented upon the second logical storage object, supplying a response to a requester of the storage protocol input/output request that indicates success of the storage input/output request. 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising eliminating redundant filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object. 4. The method of claim 1 further comprising supplying metadata that indicates a total number of the accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object. 5. The method of claim 4 further comprising recording the metadata into accumulated filesystem requests that will be supplied to the node associated with the second logical storage object. 6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising supplying a failure response to the requester that indicates failure of the storage input/output request if a change indicated by the storage input/output request is not successfully made to the second logical storage object. 7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of synchronization relationship types comprise a cascading relationship type. 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising supplying a failure response to the requester that indicates failure of the storage input/output request if a change indicated by the storage input/output request is not successfully made to the first logical storage object. 9. A non-transitory machine readable medium having stored thereon instructions for performing a method comprising program code which when executed by at least one machine, causes a machine to: receive a filesystem request being generated from a storage protocol input/output request targeting a first local storage object, the filesystem request being intercepted prior to being sent to a filesystem; determine from synchronization configuration data that the first logical storage object has a synchronization relationship with a second logical storage object; determine from the synchronization configuration data a synchronization relationship type of the synchronization relationship from a plurality of synchronization relationship types; and where the synchronization relationship type is a semi-synchronous relationship type: accumulate, during a time interval, filesystem requests that target the first logical storage object, wherein the filesystem requests include the filesystem request; supply each of the filesystem requests to the filesystem; determine dependencies among accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object; record sequencing information to preserve the dependencies, the recording comprising recording the sequencing information into accumulated filesystem requests that have a dependency and that indicate a change to be made to the first logical storage object; and supply, to a node associated with the second logical storage object, the sequencing information and accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the second logical storage object. 10. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 further comprising program code to: where the synchronization relationship type is a full synchronization relationship type specifying that responses are not to be returned to requestors until changes are made to both primary logical storage objects and secondary logical storage objects: supply the filesystem request to the filesystem; generate a request based on the filesystem request to create a generated request indicating that the second logical storage object is a target; supply the generated request for transmission to the node associated with the second logical storage object; and upon the storage input/output request successfully being implemented upon the first logical storage object and the generated request successfully being implemented upon the second logical storage object, supply a response to a requestor of the storage protocol input/output request that indicates success of the storage input/output request. 11. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 further comprising program code to eliminate redundant filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object. 12. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 further comprising program code to supply metadata that indicates a total number of the accumulated filesystem requests that indicate changes to be made to the first logical storage object. 13. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 12 further comprising program code to record the metadata into accumulated filesystem requests that will be supplied to the node associated with the second logical storage object. 14. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 further comprising program code to supply a failure response to the requester that indicates failure of the storage input/output request if a change indicated by the storage input/output request is not successfully made to the second logical storage object. 15. The non-transitory machine readable medium of claim 9 further comprising program code to supply a failure response to the requester that indicates failure of the storage input/output request if a change indicated by the storage input/output request is not successfully
Physics · mapped topic
Replication or mirroring of data, e.g. scheduling or transport for data synchronisation between network nodes · CPC title
for distributed storage of data in networks, e.g. transport arrangements for network file system [NFS], storage area networks [SAN] or network attached storage [NAS] · CPC title
Replication mechanisms · CPC title
Management specifically adapted to replicated file systems · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.