In-service monitoring of a fiberoptic network
US-9281893-B2 · Mar 8, 2016 · US
US9571189B2 · US · B2
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Publication number | US-9571189-B2 |
| Application number | US-201615061300-A |
| Country | US |
| Kind code | B2 |
| Filing date | Mar 4, 2016 |
| Priority date | Oct 23, 2013 |
| Publication date | Feb 14, 2017 |
| Grant date | Feb 14, 2017 |
A practical reading order for non-experts. Skip the full description unless you need deep technical detail.
What the patent document calls the invention.
A short plain-language summary of the technical disclosure.
Who owns or filed the patent and who is credited as inventor.
Filing, priority, publication, and grant dates set the timeline.
The legal scope of protection — read this for what is actually claimed.
Technology tags used to group this patent with similar filings.
Prior art links and similar publications in this corpus.
Official abstract text for this publication.
An optical fiber breakage point may be located by coupling to the optical fiber an out-of-band optical test signal modulated at a periodic modulation pattern. A distance to the breakage point may be determined from a difference between modulation patterns of transmitted and received test signals.
Opening claim text (preview).
What is claimed is: 1. A system comprising: a controller configured to: determine a magnitude of a returning optical test signal; determine a modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and detect fault information in a fiberoptic link based on a comparison of at least one of: the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal and a reference magnitude of an optical test signal redirected by a wavelength-selective reflector; or a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal. 2. The system of claim 1 , further comprising: a photodetector to detect the returning optical test signal. 3. The system of claim 1 , where the controller is further configured to: detect, based on the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal, that there is a break in the fiberoptic link. 4. The system of claim 1 , where the controller is further configured to: detect, based on the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical test signal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link. 5. The system of claim 1 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is optically coupled to the fiberoptic link. 6. The system of claim 1 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect the optical test signal at a first wavelength, and the first wavelength is a test wavelength. 7. The system of claim 6 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to propagate an information signal, at a second wavelength, to an antenna. 8. The system of claim 1 , where the returning optical test signal is a first returning optical test signal, the fiberoptic link is a first fiberoptic link, and controller is further configured to: determine a magnitude of a second returning optical test signal; determine a modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and detect fault information in a second fiberoptic link. 9. The system of claim 8 , where the controller, when detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, is configured to: detect the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, based on a comparison of at least one of: the determined magnitude of the second returning optical test signal and the reference magnitude of the optical test signal; or a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal. 10. The system of claim 1 , where the returning optical test signal is based on a test signal that is modulated at the periodically swept modulation frequency. 11. A method comprising: determining, by a controller, a magnitude of a returning optical test signal; determining, by the controller, a modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and detecting, by the controller, fault information in a fiberoptic link based on a comparison of at least one of: the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal and a reference magnitude of an optical test signal redirected by a wavelength-selective reflector; or a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal. 12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: detecting the returning optical test signal. 13. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: detecting, based on the determined modulation frequency offset of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal, that there is a break in the fiberoptic link. 14. The method of claim 11 , further comprising: detecting, based on the determined magnitude of the returning optical test signal being less than the reference magnitude of the optical test signal, that there is a deterioration in the fiberoptic link. 15. The method of claim 11 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is optically coupled to the fiberoptic link. 16. The method of claim 11 , where the wavelength-selective reflector is configured to redirect the optical test signal at a first wavelength, and the first wavelength is a test wavelength. 17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising: propagating an information signal, at a second wavelength, to an antenna. 18. The method of claim 11 , where the returning optical test signal is a first returning optical test signal, the fiberoptic link is a first fiberoptic link, and the method further comprises: determining a magnitude of a second returning optical test signal; determining a modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal relative to a current value of a periodically swept modulation frequency; and detecting fault information in a second fiberoptic link. 19. The method of claim 18 , where detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link includes: detecting the fault information in the second fiberoptic link, based on a comparison of at least one of: the determined magnitude of the second returning optical test signal and the reference magnitude of the optical test signal; or a comparison between the determined modulation frequency offset of the second returning optical test signal to a reference modulation frequency offset of the optical test signal. 20. The method of claim 11 , where the returning optical test signal is based on a test signal that is modulated at the periodically swept modulation frequency.
using a reflected signal, e.g. using optical time domain reflectometers [OTDR] · CPC title
Phase or frequency modulation · CPC title
Monitoring or measuring wavelength · CPC title
Related publications grouped by family.
Answers are generated from the same data shown on this page.